Journal of Addiction & Addictive Disorders Category: Clinical Type: Research Article

Psychiatric Profiles and Clinical Manifestations of Cathinone Users: Case Series of Analytically Confirmed Cathinone Use in Taiwan

Hu-Ming Chang1, Derek K Tracy2, Ming-Chyi Huang3, Chun-Hung Pan4 and Lian-Yu Chen5
1 Department of addiction psychiatry, Taipei City Psychiatric Center, Taipei City Hospital, Taiwan, province of china
2 Institute of psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, United kingdom
3 Department of psychiatry, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan, province of china
4 Department of psychology, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan, province of china
5 Institute of epidemiology and preventive medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, province of china

Received Date: Mar 05, 2019
Accepted Date: Mar 21, 2019
Published Date: Mar 29, 2019

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of new or Novel Psychoactive Substances (NPS) use has been a global public health issue; however, well-described clinical profiles of NPS users have been lacking, especially in Taiwan. Novel cathinone appear to be one of the most popular emerging NPS in East Asia, with a parallel growth in emergency department visits. However, as cathinone is undetectable by standard immunoassay urine tests in most hospitals, any links with associated clinical manifestations remain unclear. Thus, here we presented six treatment-seeking psychiatric patients whose urine samples were analytically confirmed with cathinone use. We first described their socio-demographics and psychiatric profiles, and then reported their toxicological findings confirmed by Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometers (LC-MS). We found these cathinone users were relatively young, with short duration from their first use to treatment seeking. Furthermore, the reasons for their treatment-seeking included agitation, aggressive or suicidal behaviors, highlighting the potential danger of cathinone use. Interestingly, all of them reported ingesting cathinone via “coffee sachets”, which mimic ordinary instant coffee and each pack, contained numerous illicit drugs, which accounted for multiple substances detected in their urine. In conclusion, this report calls for an urgent need to educate the health professionals and the public on the danger and the complex face of NPS. A significant amount of research is needed to fully understand both the short and long term effects of these rapidly growing NPS in Taiwan.

Keywords

Psychiatric Profiles, Clinical Manifestations

INTRODUCTION

New or Novel Psychoactive Substances (NPS), known as “legal highs”, are defined as psychotropic drugs that are not controlled by the 1961 single Convention on Narcotic Drugs or the 1971 Convention on Psychotropic Substances by United Nations [1]. Emergence of NPS is a worldwide phenomenon, evidenced by the fact that 739 different NPS were reported to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) between 2009 and 2016 [2]. Although current surveys have shown relatively lower prevalence of NPS when compared to other illicit drugs, this could be underestimated due to survey design or difficulties in forensic science [3]. A national survey from England and Wales revealed that the lifetime use of NPS was 2.9% in adults (16-59 years old) and 6.1 % in adolescents and young adults (16-24 years old) in 2014-2015 [4]. The report from National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) showed that 1.2 % of Americans aged12-34 reported lifetime use of NPS [5]. Furthermore, a remarkable growth of emergency department visits involving NPS use has been noted. For instance, based on data from the New York City Poison Center, prevalence of NPS exposure rose from 7.1% in 2011 to 12.6% of recorded cases in 2014 [6]. Another study from Europe revealed that NPS represented 5.6 % of all acute emergencies involving illicit drug use during 2013/14 [7].

However, conversely, good clinical information characterizing NPS users is scarce, especially in Asia [8]. In a study done by Lee et al, interesting variations in NPS use between countries and regions were noted. Globally, synthetic cannabinoids (40%) are the most commonly consumed agents, followed by synthetic cathinones (22%) and phenethylamines (17%) [8]. Interestingly, a report from the Global SMART Programme (Synthetics Monitoring: Analyses, Reporting and Trends) revealed a totally different trend in East and South-East Asia [9], with the most common type synthetic cathinones, following by synthetic cannabinoids. The major type of NPS in Taiwan is synthetic cathinones, in Korea synthetic cannabinoids, despite their geographical proximity [10].

Pharmacological mechanisms of synthetic cathinones involve increasing release of monoamines, which contributes to its addictive potential and psychiatric manifestations [11]. While data from the Taiwan Analytical Laboratory Drug Abuse Report System (ALDARS) revealed the proportion of synthetic cathinone in non-urine samples increased from 1.55% to 25.95% between 2013 and 2015 [12], an extremely small number of cases of synthetic cathinone use identified in medical system, accounting for only 0.2% of all illegal drug cases in 2017 [13]. The marked discrepancy from these two reporting systems could be attributed to either lack of forensic capacity to identify these substances or the unawareness of clinical features of NPS by most health professionals [14,15]. 

There is limited information focusing on the clinical manifestations and psychiatric profiles of NPS users. Furthermore, previous case studies of NPS were based on self-report instead of analytically-confirmation of their use [16]. Here we present 6 treatment-seeking cathinone users in a psychiatric center and described their socio-demographic profiles, clinical manifestations and psychiatric profiles, aiming to fill the knowledge gap of cathinone users’ profiles in Asia.

METHOD

We retrospectively identi?ed 6 patients with analytically confirmed cathinone use by urine samples who sought treatment in Taipei City Psychiatric Center in 2017. These patients had signed written consent for toxicological analysis of urine samples. We collected information regarding their socio-demographic data, psychiatric profiles, laboratory findings, toxicology results and received treatments through chart review methods.

We used Liquid Chromatography Quadrupole Time-Of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (LC-QTOF-MS) to detect the presence of NPS. More than 120 substances were examined. As for NPS, we examined the presence of cathinones as well as synthetic cannabinoids. The detailed method using LC-QTOF-MS for detecting new psychoactive substances was previously published [17]. We also obtained the patients’ consent to report our finding anonymously and the consent from the parent of one underage patient.

RESULTS

Demographic characteristics and past psychiatric history

Six cases with analytically confirmed cathinone in urine samples were ascertained (Table 1). Half of them were male, and had a mean age of 20.5 (±4.3) years (ranges between 14-26 years). The average education was 9.8 years. Notably, three of them reported to have had experiences of significant childhood adversities and two patients had a family history of depression or suicide. Two patients had a prior psychiatric history before using cathinones, including one with major depressive disorder and one with methamphetamine-induced psychotic disorder.
 

Patient No.

Age (years)

Gender

Childhood Adversity

Family History

Psychiatric History

Past History of Other Substances

Onset of Cathinone Use

Route of Cathinone Use

1

19

Male

Emotional neglect

Depression

No

Ketamine
Marijuana

18

Ingesting drugs through “coffee sachets”

2

14

Female

Emotional neglect

No

No

Ketamine
Methamphetamine

13

Ingesting drugs through “coffee sachets”

3

18

Female

No

Depression

Major depression

MDMA
Methamphetamine

 

Ingesting drugs through “coffee sachets”

17

4

26

Male

Unknown

No

No

MDMA
Ketamine

26

Ingesting drugs through “coffee sachets”

5

20

Male

No

No

Methamphetamine induced psychotic disorder

Ketamine
MDMA
Methamphetamine
Marijuana

20

Ingesting drugs through “coffee sachets”

6

26

Female

Physical abuse

No

No

Ketamine
MDMA
Methamphetamine

23

Ingesting drugs through “coffee sachets”

 
Table 1: Socio-demographic characteristics, past psychiatric and drug use history of the six analytically-confirmed cathinone users.
 

Clinical manifestations, treatment course and toxicological results

Half of the cases came from the psychiatric outpatient department (n=3) and half from the emergency department (n=3). Their clinical manifestations were shown in table 2. Strikingly, five out of six patients experienced psychotic symptoms such as visual and auditory hallucinations, delusions of reference and persecution within months of their first use of cathinone. Alarmingly, four of them reported suicidal attempts whilst directly under the influence of cathinones. The suicidal methods were of high lethality, including attempted hanging, drug overdose, jumping from a height, and wrist cutting. Three of them reported having violent behaviors under the influence of cathinone. 
 

Patient No.

DSM-5 Diagnosis

Clinical Setting

Reasons for
Treatment Seeking

Clinical Manifestations

Toxicology
Finding

Treatment

Hospital Admission

1

Stimulant induced psychotic disorder
Stimulant use disorder

ED

Suicidal attempt due to psychotic symptoms

Agitation
Visual and auditory hallucinations
Delusions of reference and persecution

Mephedrone
N-ethylpentylone
Amphetamine
Methamphetamine

Risperidone 4mg/day

Yes

2

Stimulant induced psychotic disorder
Stimulant use disorder

ED

Agitation due to psychotic symptoms

Agitation
Sensory distortion
Visual and auditory hallucinations

N-ethylpentylone
Amphetamine
Methamphetamine

Risperidone 2-4mg/day

Yes

3

Major depressive disorder
Stimulant use disorder
Anorexia Nervosa

OPD

Suicidal attempt due to depressive symptoms

Mood liability
Auditory hallucination
Persecutory delusion

N-ethylpentylone
Nimetazepam

Escitalopram 10mg/day

Yes

4

Stimulant induced psychotic disorder
Stimulant use disorder

ED

Suicide attempt due to psychotic symptoms

Agitation
Jealous and persecutory delusions

Mephedrone
N-ethylpentylone
4-Chloromethcathinone
Amphetamine
Methamphetamine
Nimetazepam

Haloperidol 5mg IM
Lorazepam 2mg IM

No

5

Stimulant induced psychotic disorder
Stimulant use disorder

OPD

Psychotic symptoms

Auditory hallucination
Delusions of reference and persecution

Mephedrone
4-Chloromethcathinone
Butylone
Dibutylone

Risperidone 4mg/day

No

6

Stimulant use disorder

OPD

Mandatory treatment for illicit scheduled II drug use

Alertness,
Excitement,
Pending behaviors

Methcathinone

No

No

 Table 2: Clinical manifestations, toxicology finding and treatment course of the six analytically-confirmed cathinone users.
Note: MDMA: 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine.
 
Three out of six were prescribed antipsychotics (risperidone 2-4mg per day) while one patient refused to take any antipsychotics. Three patients were hospitalized to an acute psychiatric ward due to their suicidal attempts or psychotic symptoms with the average length of stay in hospital 16 days.

The toxicology findings of the cases included a variety of cathinones including mephedrone, N-ethylpentylone, 4-chloromethcathinone, butylone, dibutylone, methcathinone. Strikingly, all of them denied using other illicit drug use; however, they all claimed to ingest “instant coffee sachets” containing mixed psychoactive substances including cathinone and other illicit drugs. They denied concurrent use of methamphetamine, amphetamine or ketamine. Based on their report, they did know the coffee drink contained a mixture of illicit drugs; however, most of them did not know the exact components of the drink.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we reported six treatment-seeking patients with cathinone use analytically confirmed by LC-QTOF MS examination. Through these cases, we found some striking features which require high clinical and public health attention. First, these patients are relatively young with age ranged from 14 to 26. Second, there was a relatively short period of time from their first use of cathinone to their treatment-seeking behaviors, whether due to psychotic symptoms, suicidal attempts, or aggressive behaviors. Third, all of them reported a new pattern of substance use-ingesting “instant coffee sachets” which contained a mixture of illicit psychoactive substances including amphetamines, ketamine or cathinone. Lastly, we found a high prevalence of suicidal attempts (3 out of 6) with highly lethal methods in these cases, highlighting the significance of suicidal risk evaluation among cathinone users.

The mean age of these six cases was 20.5 years old, which suggested that adolescents or young adults were particularly vulnerable to cathinone use. These cases developed psychotic symptoms in less than one year, which is shorter than typically seen in methamphetamine users. In a previous study, methamphetamine users were one average 30 years old in Taiwan [18] and 64% of methamphetamine users developed psychosis more than one year after their first methamphetamine use [19]. Another Japanese study also showed methamphetamine users developed psychotic symptoms 1.7 to 4.4 years on average after their first use of methamphetamine [20]. As cathinone users in Taiwan seemed to be younger and to report shorter duration from initiation to severe psychiatric symptoms, public campaign aimed at educating the younger population on the potential danger of these drugs was imperative.

There is also a new pattern of drug use that requires our attention-all these cathinone users claimed to drink a mixture of drugs from an instant coffee sachet. In Europe and the United States, cathinone is commonly manufactured as white powder or capsules. Methods of using cathinone includes snorting, ingestion (either with a moistened finger or wrapped in paper), or less commonly, injection [21]. In the six cases, they denied using cathinone directly through snorting or ingestion but to drink “coffee sachets” which contained of mixture of drugs, confirmed by our toxicological findings that each of their urine showed an average of 3.3 kinds of illicit drugs. 

Reports from the Forensic Early Warning System (FEWS) showed most of NPS were sold in a mixture of two to three kinds of psychoactive components [22], which is consistent with our finding of “coffee sachets culture” in Taiwan. However, mixture of psychoactive substances could potentiate their physical harm as the drug interactions between different psychoactive substances could be complex and life-threatening. For example, synthetic cathinones and amphetamine could both cause sympathomimetic effects and severe complications like seizures, arrhythmias were found in some cases [23]. Mephedrone, one of the most common cathinones, could lead to death especially when concomitant use of other substances [24,25].

Three out of six cases reported suicidal attempt with high lethality under cathinone related psychosis. Previous work has shown that delusions induced by cathinone use can be bizarre and accompanied with repeated suicide attempts [26]. Other studies have shown that cathinone users might have a higher prevalence of suicide (Elliott & Evans, 2014). According to a post-mortem study, the proportion of suicide in all-cause mortalities involving cathinone could be as high as 66% [25]. A previous study showed a higher proportion of cathinone-related deaths used hanging or other mechanical ways to commit suicide [27], while the reasons remain unclear.

The rapid emergence of NPS poses challenges to traditional drug control policy all over the world. Several legal responses have been held to tackle this problem in a national level [28]. The most common one is analogue approach, which controls analogue drugs with chemical similarity to already controlled substances as in the U.S [29]. Another approach is general prohibitions, which prohibit supply, import and export of any psychoactive substance that is not exempted like Canada [30]. The third one is full regulatory approach, which permits and regulate sale of limited NPS that are proven to be of low risk, as done in some European countries [28]. Taiwan seems to be unprepared for this public health challenges as in Taiwan we regulated only 10% of the NPS [8], while this new pattern of drug use have increased drastically. To hold a public forum to discuss the drug policy on regulating the NPS is imperative and necessary.

To our humble knowledge, this is the first case series on the clinical features of analytically confirmed cathinone users in Asia. We first described their clinical features and reported their novel route of ingesting cathinone by using “instant coffee sachets” Taiwan. The high risk of developing psychotic symptoms and suicidality calls for serious clinical and public attention. A major limitation of this study is that in some cases several substances were found in their urine; thus it is hard to attribute their clinical manifestations to cathinone only. However, our finding also highlighted the multiple drug use patterns of NPS users. Also, individuals with severe physical complications will not seek treatment in a psychiatric center. Another limitation is that three of six cases showed positive for methamphetamine in urine tests; thus, the effects of methamphetamine in these cases cannot be fully ruled out. Lastly, all of our cases ingest cathinone orally, therefore we did not observe the effects of cathinone once injected intravenously [16,31] and or for long-term use [32]. As these cathinone users were young and most of them showed highly suicidal or aggressive behaviors, we hope this study could help offering implications for health professionals and law makers to curb the increasing trend of NPS use.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank Prof. Jou-Feng Deng from the Taiwan National Poison Control Center for his technical assistance in conducting the toxicological analysis.

CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS

All the authors declared no conflicts of interests.

GRANT SUPPORT

Taipei City Hospital (10701-62-002).

REFERENCES

  1. The Council of the European Union (2005) COUNCIL DECISION 2005/387/JHA of 10 May 2005 on the information exchange, risk-assessment and control of new psychoactive substances. Official Journal of the European Union.
  2. UNODC (2017) World Drug Report.
  3. Sumnall HR (2016) Epidemiology of use of novel psychoactive substances. Handbuch Psychoaktive Substanzen Pg no: 1-19.
  4. Deborah L (2016) Drug Misuse: Findings from the 2015/16 Crime Survey for England and Wales. Home Office, London, United Kingdom.
  5. Palamar JJ, Martins SS, Su MK, Ompad DC (2015) Self-reported use of novel psychoactive substances in a US nationally representative survey: Prevalence, correlates, and a call for new survey methods to prevent underreporting. Drug Alcohol Depend 156: 112-119.
  6. Bush DM, Woodwell DA (2014) Update: Drug-related emergency department visits involving synthetic cannabinoids. The CBHSQ Report. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Rockville, USA.
  7. Dines AM, Wood DM, Yates C, Heyerdahl F, Hovda KE, et al. (2015) Acute recreational drug and new psychoactive substance toxicity in Europe: 12 months data collection from the European Drug Emergencies Network (Euro-DEN). Clin Toxicol (Phila) 53: 893-900.
  8. Lee J, Yang S, Kang Y, Han E, Feng LY, et al. (2017) Prevalence of new psychoactive substances in Northeast Asia from 2007 to 2015. Forensic Sci Int 272: 1-9.
  9. UNODC (2017) The Challenge of Synthetic Drugs in East and South-East Asia.
  10. Feng LY, Yu WJ, Chang WT, Han E, Chung H, et al. (2016) Comparison of illegal drug use pattern in Taiwan and Korea from 2006 to 2014. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 11: 34.
  11. Simmler LD, Buser TA, Donzelli M, Schramm Y, Dieu LH, et al. (2013) Pharmacological characterization of designer cathinones in vitro. Br J Pharmacol 168: 458-470.
  12. Taiwan Food and Drug Administration (2016) Discovering New Psychoactive Substances (NPS).
  13. Taiwan Food and Drug Administration (2017) Annual Report of the Statistical Data of Drug Abuse Cases and Laboratory Testing.
  14. Pirona A, Bo A, Hedrich D, Ferri M, van Gelder N, et al. (2017) New psychoactive substances: Current health-related practices and challenges in responding to use and harms in Europe. Int J Drug Policy 40: 84-92.
  15. Simonato P, Corazza O, Santonastaso P, Corkery J, Deluca P, et al. (2013) Novel psychoactive substances as a novel challenge for health professionals: Results from an Italian survey. Hum Psychopharmacol 28: 324-331.
  16. Batisse A, Fortias M, Bourgogne E, Grégoire M, Sec I, et al. (2014) Case series of 21 synthetic cathinones abuse. J Clin Psychopharmacol 34: 411-413.
  17. Glicksberg L, Bryand K, Kerrigan S (2016) Identification and quantification of synthetic cathinones in blood and urine using liquid chromatography-quadrupole/time of flight (LC-Q/TOF) mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 1035: 91-103.
  18. National Institute of Justice (1999) Meth matters: Report on methamphetamine users in five western cities. National Institute of Justice, Washington, D.C., USA.
  19. Matsumoto T, Kamijo A, Miyakawa T, Endo K, Yabana T, et al. (2002) Methamphetamine in Japan: The consequences of methamphetamine abuse as a function of route of administration. Addiction 97: 809-817.
  20. Ujike H, Sato M (2004) Clinical features of sensitization to methamphetamine observed in patients with methamphetamine dependence and psychosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1025: 279-287.
  21. Measham F, Moore K, Newcombe R, Zoë (2010) Tweaking, bombing, dabbing and stockpiling: The emergence of mephedrone and the perversity of prohibition. Drugs and Alcohol Today 10: 14-21.
  22. Home Office forensic early warning system (2015) Annual Report on the Home Office Forensic Early Warning System (FEWS) -2016/17 A system to identify New Psychoactive Substances (NPS) in the UK. Home Office forensic early warning system, London, United Kingdom.
  23. Spiller HA, Ryan ML, Weston RG, Jansen J (2011) Clinical experience with and analytical confirmation of "bath salts" and "legal highs" (synthetic cathinones) in the United States. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 49: 499-505.
  24. Busardò FP, Kyriakou C, Napoletano S, Marinelli E, Zaami S (2015) Mephedrone related fatalities: A review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 19: 3777-3790.
  25. Cosbey SH, Peters KL, Quinn A, Bentley A (2013) Mephedrone (methylmethcathinone) in toxicology casework: A Northern Ireland perspective. J Anal Toxicol 37: 74-82.
  26. Dragogna F, Oldani L, Buoli M, Altamura AC (2014) A case of severe psychosis induced by novel recreational drugs. F1000Res 3: 21.
  27. Elliott S, Evans J (2014) A 3-year review of new psychoactive substances in casework. Forensic Sci Int 243: 55-60.
  28. Hughes B, Winstock AR (2012) Controlling new drugs under marketing regulations. Addiction 107: 1894-1899.
  29. U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division (1987) Handbook on the Anti Drug Abuse Act of 1986.
  30. Reuter P, Pardo B (2017) Can new psychoactive substances be regulated effectively? An assessment of the British Psychoactive Substances Bill. Addiction 112: 25-31.
  31. Van Hout MC, Bingham T (2012) "A costly turn on": Patterns of use and perceived consequences of mephedrone based head shop products amongst Irish injectors. Int J Drug Policy 23: 188-197.
  32. Penders TM, Lang MC, Pagano JJ, Gooding ZS (2013) Electroconvulsive therapy improves persistent psychosis after repeated use of methylenedioxypyrovalerone (“bath salts”). J ECT 29: 59-60. 

Citation: Chang HM, Tracy DK, Huang MC, Pan CH, Chen LY (2019) Psychiatric Profiles and Clinical Manifestations of Cathinone Users: Case Series of Analytically Confirmed Cathinone Use in Taiwan. J Addict Addictv Disord 6: 23.

Copyright: © 2019  Hu-Ming Chang, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


Herald Scholarly Open Access is a leading, internationally publishing house in the fields of Sciences. Our mission is to provide an access to knowledge globally.



© 2024, Copyrights Herald Scholarly Open Access. All Rights Reserved!