Atopic Eczema (AE) is a very common chronic skin inflammatory disease characterized by flares and remission phases [1]. AE is the most common form of inflammatory skin diseases affecting up to 20% of children [2]. It is a typical disease of paediatric age with 90% of cases appearing before 5 years of age. However it could persist in adult age in 30% of affected patients [3]. Recently Margolis et al., [4] have demonstrated that AE could actually continue in up to 80% of adult subjects who have suffered AE during childhood. This shows that AE should be considered a life-long illness. Skin xerosis and itch are the hallmark of the disease pointing out that skin barrier alteration is the background condition of AE [5]. From a clinical point of view AE is characterized by erythema, oedema, skin erosion and excoriation affecting mainly face, limbs and flexural areas [6]. In chronic phases lichenification is commonly seen [7]. AE has a profound impact in quality of life especially when skin conditions negatively affect sleep [8]. Alteration in skin barrier functions and an abnormal Th2-driven immune-response are the two pathogenetic mechanisms [9]. For several years the “Inside-Outside” dilemma has characterized the debate regarding which are the culprit mechanisms involved in the starting of the disease [10]. The pivotal works of Elias [11] and Cork [12] have definitely pointed out that skin barrier alteration is the “primum movens” defect causing the development of AE.
A normal skin barrier function is crucial in order to maintain a correct hydration of the body and in order to block penetration through the skin of noxious substances such as toxins and allergens [13]. When skin barrier function is reduced, xerosis, alteration of skin microbioma with pathogenic bacteria colonization and inflammation occur [14]. It is now clearly demonstrated that AE is actually due to skin barrier alteration [15]. Furthermore, it is recognised that skin barrier dysfunction precedes eczema development. Three are the major skin barrier defects documented in subjects with AE: a reduced skin lipid contents [16] (mainly ceramide compartment), a reduced production of filaggrin [17] (both primary and acquired) and finally a reduced synthesis of skin-derived antimicrobial peptides [18]. Therefore AE could develop as a result of an increase allergens entry through an altered skin barrier and this in turn results in starting inflammatory processes mediated by a production of Th2-dependent pro-inflammatory cytokines [19]. A genetic defect in the production of filaggrin has been demonstrated in up to 40% of patients with AE [20]. However in subjects with AE without a filaggrin genetic defects a reduced synthesis could be secondary to Th2-mediated responses. For example IL-25 could reduce filaggrin skin contents [21]. Also IL-17 is able to down-regulate filaggrin synthesis [22]. Lack or reduced skin level of filaggrin play a central role in altering the skin barrier function [23]. In fact normal amounts filaggrin are important in maintaining a correct skin hydration [24], and a correct pH [25]. When skin filaggrin levels are reduced there is a tendency of skin pH to increase [26]. This favours the activation of serin-protease enzymes which digest keratinocyte tight junctions further altering the barrier performances of the skin [27]. Filaggrin break-down products are pivotal in the formation of Natural Moisturizing Factor and in the acidification of epidermis. The skin barrier defect observed in atopic eczema therefore causes an increase in Transepidermal Water Loss (TEWL) favouring xerosis, an increase of allergen and irritants substances penetration provoking inflammation and a reduction of AMP production which could provoke an increase skin adhesion and proliferation of bacteria such as S.aureus which could initiate AE flare episodes [28]. As stated by Jung [29] dryness of the skin is a hallmark of AE. It is due to epidermal barrier as a consequence an increased TEWL. Therefore an altered skin barrier is the initial step which initiates a kind of “vicious circle” with dryness, tendency to itching and scratching, risk of super-infection and inflammation. In addition lipid compositions of Stratum Corneum (SC) could also play an important role in the pathogenesis of AE. Janssens et al., [30] quite recently have shown that in AE subjects both lesional and non lesional skin area present an altered lipid/protein ratio in comparison with normal controls. In addition the lipid/protein ratio alteration in SC of patients with AE correlated strongly with the skin barrier function and disease severity. The composition of lipid content for example with the increase of ceramides with an extreme short chain length is drastically increased in SC of AE patients. This alteration, independent from fillagrin mutations, leads to an aberrant lipid organization and a decreased skin barrier function [31]. However lipid content of SC could be also affected by inflammatory processes. Tawada et al., [32] have shown that cytokines, in particular Interferon gamma, could affect lipid synthesis in the skin compromising the barrier function of SC in AE subjects. These data are important because suggest that alteration of lipid content of SC could be one of the direct causes of skin barrier alteration in AE, but at the same time an alteration in lipid composition could be also a consequence of inflammatory processes during AE.
Emollient and moisturizing compounds are considered a main stay therapy of AE [33]. Several international guidelines point out that this strategy should be considered as a background approach for all grade of severity of AE. Daily use of an emollient is now universally recommended to enhance and protect skin barrier [34]. Conservative dry-skin care is very beneficial for AE and should form the basis of management of atopic eczema [35]. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines recommend the daily use of emollient and moisturizing for mild, moderate and severe AE [36]. The rational of the use of emollients in AE should be found mainly in the capability to correct the increased TEWL and therefore to reduce xerosis [37]. Restoring a normal skin hydration could have indirect positive effects also on pH and barrier function [38]. The skin barrier function improvement offered by emollient products is relevant in the long term strategy of AE treatment also because in quiescent atopic dermatitis the application of topical corticosteroid actually reduces skin barrier function with an increase in TEWL [39]. This underlies the importance of a daily care treatment of skin in this clinical setting. An ideal effective emollient product should be able to offer control to mild eczema, to reduce the use of topical steroid (the so called steroid sparing effect) and finally to prevent future eczema deterioration when use in between flares periods [40].
Ceramide, filaggrin and Anti-Microbial-Peptides (AMP) defects are the three main mechanisms which characterize the skin barrier defect of AE [41]. Therefore an “ideal” emollient-moisturizing product should restore the lipid mantle, improve skin hydration and if possible to re-establish a normal AMP production. Pharmacological induction of AMPs at epithelial barriers could have therapeutic utility. It has been recently reported that the discovery of substances with low molecular weight can induce epithelial antimicrobial peptide production in cell-based assays. In particular L-isoleucine and its analogues are highly specific ß-defensin inducers in epithelial cells. Fehlbaum et al., [42] have demonstrated that L-isoleucine, in a dose-dependent manner, could induce defensin production in epithelia. AMPs constitute an important component of the mammalian innate immune response [43]. Isoleucine therefore could be considered an AMP-promoter at skin level. Particular therapeutic interest in AE topical treatments is addressed to non-corticosteroid substances which could exert anti-inflammatory actions. Rhamnosoft is a biosaccaride formed by rhamnose, galactose and glucuronic acid. This compound is able to adhere to specific keratinocytes receptors. In keratinocytes in vitro cultures studies have shown that rhamnosoft could inhibit Interleukine 1 synthesis, inhibit neutrophil adhesion and reduce phospholipase 2 activity. In addition rhamnosoft stimulates beta-endorfin production [44]. This molecule therefore expresses anti-inflammatory action at skin level.
New emollient products available for patients with AE in general have a composition with different substances trying to address all the alterations of skin barrier (Table 1). In general there are lipid compounds such as ceramides and moisturizing substances such as glycerine. New available products could have additional non-corticosteroid substances with anti-inflammatory properties [38]. The clinical efficacy of emollient in AE has been supported by several clinical studies [45-47]. The multicentre Barrier Enhancement for Eczema Prevention (BEEP study) has shown that once-daily application of an emollient from birth through to the age of 6 months is able to prevent atopic dermatitis flares [48]. The 6-month cumulative incidence of eczema was 21.8% in the emollient group, in comparison with 43.3% in the control group. This means a 67% reduction in risk. In children with moderate AE, Szczepanowska et al., [49] have evaluated whether adding emollients to the standard topical corticosteroid therapy could influence the clinical outcome. Concomitant usage of emollients significantly improves xerosis and pruritus during corticosteroid treatment of atopic dermatitis, and enables to maintain clinical improvement after therapy discontinuation [50]. Therefore, dry-skin care is very beneficial for patients with AE reducing trans-epidermal water loss and reducing skin barrier compromise [51]. Patrizi et al., [52] in a multicentre randomised trial have shown that the use an emollient cream (MAS063DP) was effective in mild to moderate AE improving the clinical evolution. The same product was evaluated by Belloni et al., [53] in 30 adult subjects with AE, showing a reduction of EASI score after one month of therapy. In a recent multicentre trial conducted in 107 children with mild-moderate AE of the face, Marseglia et al., [54] have shown that a topical anti-inflammatory moisturising facial cream containing rhamnosoft, ceramides and L-Isoleucine was able to significantly reduce the Eczema Area Severity Index (EASI) score by 84% in comparison with baseline after 6 weeks of treatment (Figure 1). This clinical effect was statistically superior to the effect on EASI score obtained in the control group treated with a simple emollient cream. This clinical efficacy was confirmed in a cases series report of six children with moderate atopic dermatitis of the face [55]. A recent study conducted with a body cream containing rhamnosoft, ceramide, niacinamide and polidocanol and iso-leucine in 15 children with mild-to-moderate AE treated for 4 weeks has shown a 71% reduction of Eczema Severity score in comparison with baseline levels (Figure 2) [55]. The use of emollient products in newborn at high risk of development of AE could be useful also in preventing the appearance of the disease [56].
Author | Year | Product | Study Design | Subjects | Outcome |
Szczepanowska | 2008 | Topical corticosteroid vs. topical corticosteroid plus emollient | Randomised controlled | 52 | Improvement of EASI |
Patrizi | 2008 | Lipid-based Emollient cream | Randomised controlled | 60 | Improvement of Clinical assessment |
Belloni | Lipid-based Emollient cream | Randomised controlled | 30 | Improvement of EASI score | |
Marseglia | 2014 | Emollient/moisturizing plus Isoleucine cream | Randomised controlled | 107 | Improvement in EASI and Clinical evaluation |
Table 1: Controlled Clinical Trials supporting the efficacy of emollient/moisturizing products in AE.
Figure 1: Clinical efficacy of a ceramide, rhamnosoft and iso-leucine facial cream in AE in comparison with a standard emollient cream: Evolution of Eczema severity Score [54].
Figure 2: Clinical efficacy of a ceramide, niacinamide, iso-leucine body cream in AE: Evolution of Eczema severity Score [57].
Every day’s emollient treatment is considered a mainstay of AE treatment alone or in combination with other therapies. The use of emollients has shown to reduce the risk of AE flares and to reduce the need for topical corticosteroid. New emollient and moisturising products able to act on different aspects of skin barrier defects have demonstrated not only to control symptoms and signs of AE but also to improve the skin barrier functions acting specifically in the lipid component of skin barrier, in reducing inflammatory mechanisms and finally in normalising keratynocite AMP production.
Citation: Milani M (2015) Barrier Repair Therapy in Atopic Eczema: New Evidences in Improving Skin Functions with Topical Emolliency and Hydration Strategies. J Clin Dermatol Ther 2: 011.
Copyright: © 2015 Massimo Milani, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.