Feeling as Intervention: A Perspective on Emotional–Somatic Approaches to Chronic Pain Management

Chronic pain sits at the intersection of physiology, emotion, learning, and lived experience [1-3]. For decades, biomedical and even many mindbody approaches have attempted to treat pain by working primarily with cognition or movement - stretching, strengthening, reframing thoughts, improving posture, managing stress. These strategies matter, and for some conditions they are enough [4,5]. But for many people, pain persists despite doing "all the right things" [1,2]. 

There is a growing recognition that something deeper is at play. Chronic pain is influenced not only by tissue state or biomechanics but also by cumulative stress load, threat-based learning, and nonconscious protective responses that can persist long after the original trigger [1,2,6,7]. These drivers are often addressed indirectly, if at all. Yet they may be key mechanisms that keep pain patterns running [1,2,6].

Movement practices like yoga can support interoceptive attention, autonomic settling, and gentle mobilisation of connective tissues [5,8-11]. However, movement alone does not necessarily update the emotional and threat-related learning that can maintain protective bracing, avoidance, and pain-related fear [7,2]. 

Feeling-based interventions, by contrast, aim to directly engage the emotional-somatic layer - the felt sense of what the system is carrying - and to reduce the charge associated with implicit learning and conflict [6,12,13]. When delivered skilfully, these approaches may help patients access and process affective material that is otherwise bypassed by cognitive discussion, and may reduce the need for ongoing protective output [1,6,13]. 

HeartSpeak is designed to work precisely at this layer. It focuses on eliciting and clearing specific feeling states - not through narrative rehearsal, but through felt experience and guided somatic attention. This is potentially relevant for chronic pain, where stress-associated learning and emotional conflict can remain active below awareness, contributing to persistent tension, altered movement strategies, and pain amplification [1,2,6,7].

In the yoga-based pilot study, participants engaged in gentle movement interspersed with brief HeartSpeak sequences [14]. Across 12 classes (n=96), pain scores on a numerical rating scale decreased from pre-class to post-class, with mean values shifting from 5.5 to 2.9 (p<0.01). The reduction occurred in every class, reaching statistical significance in 10 of 12 sessions [14]. 

These findings are preliminary and do not establish causation. However, they add to a broader literature suggesting that mindbody approaches that emphasise embodied attention and emotional processing can meaningfully shift pain for some patients, particularly when stress and emotional load are prominent drivers [4,5,6,13].

Several mechanisms may explain these early results:

• Implicit emotional memory – Implicit learning and pain-related fear can drive protective responses long after the initiating event has passed. Interventions that update threat learning (including affective processing approaches) may reduce these conditioned responses [2,7,13].
• Fascial tension – Fascial and connective tissues are biologically active, richly innervated, and responsive to both loading and biochemical conditions. Persistent guarding and altered movement can contribute to ongoing tissue sensitivity and stiffness [10,11].
• Interoceptive awareness - the capacity to notice internal sensations without immediately analysing or avoiding them - differs in pain populations and is a plausible mechanism of action in several mindbody approaches [8,9].
• Movement - may help distribute new patterns through the system, supporting integration and reducing the likelihood of older protective strategies reasserting themselves [5,11].

From this perspective, chronic pain is not just a biomechanical or cognitive problem. It is also a learned, protective pattern - shaped by stress, threat, and implicit memory - that can become entrenched unless those drivers are addressed [1-3,6,7].

The field is already moving toward integrative models of chronic pain [1, 2]. But "integration" often means adding movement to psychology, or psychology to rehabilitation. The emotional-somatic layer - where feeling, learning, and body-based protection intersect - remains under-addressed in many clinical pathways [6,13]. 

HeartSpeak’s early results suggest that guided feeling may be one clinically useful route into that layer. When people are supported to notice and move through specific internal states, emotional charge can resolve, and pain-related protection may soften. When this occurs alongside movement, the system may reorganise more efficiently [5,13,14].

Larger, well-designed studies are needed. A randomised controlled trial comparing yoga-only versus yoga plus HeartSpeak would help clarify the contribution of the emotional-somatic component [5,14]. While blinding is challenging in behavioural trials, assessor blinding and credible active controls can reduce bias [1]. Physiological and functional measures - such as movement variability, autonomic markers, and relevant tissue or stiffness measures - could help test plausible mechanisms [3,9-11]. 

Even at this early stage, feeling-based interventions deserve a place in the chronic pain research agenda. They may offer a route to change for people who have tried multiple approaches yet remain stuck in a persistent pattern of protection and pain [1,2,6,13,14].

1. Gatchel RJ, Peng YB, Peters ML, Fuchs PN, Turk DC (2007) The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: scientific advances and future directions. Psychol Bull 133: 581-624.
2. Moseley GL (2007) Reconceptualising pain according to modern pain science. Phys Ther Rev 12: 169-178.
3. Apkarian AV, Baliki MN, Geha PY (2009) Towards a theory of chronic pain. Prog Neurobiol 87: 81-97.
4. Hilton L, Hempel S, Ewing BA, Apaydin E, Xenakis L, et al. (2017) Mindfulness meditation for chronic pain: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Behav Med 51: 199-213.
5. Cramer H, Lauche R, Haller H, Dobos G (2013) A systematic review and meta-analysis of yoga for low back pain. Clin J Pain 29: 450-460.
6. Johnson AC, Greenwood-Van Meerveld B (2014) Stress-induced pain: a target for the development of novel therapeutics. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 351: 327-335.
7. Vlaeyen JWS, Linton SJ (2000) Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art. Pain 85: 317-332.
8. Mehling WE, Price C, Daubenmier JJ, Acree M, Bartmess E, et al. (2012) The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA). PLoS One 7: 48230.
9. Mehling WE, Daubenmier J, Price CJ, Acree M, Bartmess E, et al. (2013) Self-reported interoceptive awareness in primary care patients with past or current low back pain. J Pain Res 6: 403-418.
10. Zügel M, Maganaris CN, Wilke J, Jurkat-Rott K, Klingler W, et al. (2018) Fascial tissue research in sports medicine: from molecules to tissue adaptation, injury and diagnostics: consensus statement. Br J Sports Med 52: 1497-1506.
11. Schleip R, Müller DG (2013) Training principles for fascial connective tissues: scientific foundation and suggested practical applications. J Bodyw Mov Ther 17: 103-115.
12. Nader K, Schafe GE, Le Doux JE (2000) Fear memories require protein synthesis in the amygdala for reconsolidation after retrieval. Nature 406: 722-726.
13. Lumley MA, Schubiner H, Lockhart NA, Kidwell KM, Harte SE, et al. (2017) Emotional awareness and expression therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, and education for fibromyalgia: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Pain 158: 2354-2363.
14. Jensen AM, Hotek JA (2023) A Novel Approach to the Management of Chronic Pain Using HeartSpeak®, an Emotional-Somatic Release Technique, in a Yoga Context. Ann Yoga Phys Ther 6: 1053.