Journal of Gerontology & Geriatric Medicine Category: Medical Type: Short Commentary

On the Substrate of Memory: Engram and Mitoengram

Amin Cheikhi1*
1 Mcgowan Institute For Regenerative Medicine, University Of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States

*Corresponding Author(s):
Amin Cheikhi
Mcgowan Institute For Regenerative Medicine, University Of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States
Tel:+1 4125017295,
Email:amc165@pitt.edu

Received Date: May 01, 2020
Accepted Date: May 06, 2020
Published Date: May 13, 2020

INTRODUCTION

Mitochondria hold great therapeutic promise for a range of age-related diseases and disorders owing to their aptitude to orchestrate a myriad of signaling cascades that govern tissue maintenance and repair [1]. Age-associated mitochondrial dysfunction undermines these cell and organismal homeostasis-maintaining roles [1-4]. As such, the evolutionary mitochondrial mechanisms that define cell phenotype are both less efficient and less effective in the geriatric population notably in organs, tissues and cells with elevated metabolic demands [5,6]. Although mitochondria have long been considered solely from the vantage point of metabolic requirements for transitions between stem cell states, increasing evidence dispel this reductive notion and suggests that mitochondria heavily impact stem cell identity and fate decisions [7,8]. Indeed, we and other researchers have found that altered mitochondrial dynamics and inheritance represent a critical source of cellular memory in various empirical models [9-13]. 

Over the past century, the accepted view of memory is rooted in two substantial theories; the Engram Theory [14], which describes a sparse ensemble of select neuronal cells that undergo persistent biophysical and/or biochemical changes (i.e., engram) to store and recall memories, and the Hebbian Theory [15] which postulated that the emergence of the engram cell collective is linked to the augmented synaptic connectivity, a mechanism that has been empirically confirmed [16-21]. This conceptualization of memory as a functional pattern of cellular interconnections does broadly harmonize with insights arising from startling observations that memory can also be stored in only a minor subset of individual non-neuronal cells in the context of both naturally-occurring and synthetic cellular memory [9,12]. Though direct functional involvement of mitochondrial bioenergetics in memory, such as through mitochondrial cannabinoid receptor CB1 of hippocampal neurons [22] or mitoflash (i.e., local and transient ROS burst) [23], and more recently, through cytochrome c oxidase subunit 4 (Cox4) [24], is known now, the enduring physicochemical changes of mitochondria and connectivity patterns of mitochondrial networks underlying the transgenerational inheritance of cellular memory, or mitoengram [12], has not been previously explored in the traditional research setting of cell engram. 

Mitochondria represent an important therapeutic target with tremendous translation potential. Understanding how the mitochondrial mechanisms of memory storage and retrieval is a crucial step in understanding how to better treat the dementing illnesses affecting our rapidly expanding geriatric population. From single cells to organs, memory traces can have enabling and constraining functional effects with profound structural, dynamical and regulatory ramifications, including in clinical settings [25-27]. As the complex molecular and physiological manifestations of both chronological and/or replicative aging accrue and compound, and as the lifetime-transient cellular experiences continue to amass, it is completely conceivable that the cell capacity to record, store, retrieve or erase memories declines with the decline of the underlying mitochondrial substrate. 

Intriguing questions thus emerge: might we near a point where we can make on-demand healthy cellular memories if we hold a better comprehension of specific physiological and pathological states of mitochondrial function and architecture? Can the gain of mitochondrial insights into cellular memory lead to novel approaches to enhance maintenance and repair of aged or diseased tissues? Furthermore, with this very rudimentary understanding and significant knowledge gaps, what are the state-of-the-art technological toolbox that can enable us to address these queries? The discovery of mitoengram [12] is important not only because it reveals a previously undescribed mechanism underlying the cellular memory dependence on mitochondria, but also because it defines mitochondria as a universal unit of cognitive information, beyond the brain cell engram, and raises tantalizing possibilities for the next-generation of molecular and cellular cognition therapeutics [28].

REFERENCES

  1. McBride HM, Neuspiel M, Wasiak S (2006) Mitochondria: More than just a powerhouse. Curr Biol 16: 551-560.
  2. Shadel GS, Horvath TL (2015) Mitochondrial ROS signaling in organismal homeostasis. Cell 163: 560-569.
  3. Lane N (2006) Mitochondrial disease: Powerhouse of disease. Nature 440: 600-602.
  4. Darley-Usmar V (2004) The powerhouse takes control of the cell; the role of mitochondria in signal transduction. Free Radic Biol Med 37: 753-754.
  5. Peinado JR, Diaz-Ruiz A, Frühbeck G, Malagon MM (2014) Mitochondria in metabolic disease: Getting clues from proteomic studies. Proteomics 14: 452-466.
  6. Kun E, Volfin P (1966) Metabolic differences between mitochondria isolated from various tissues. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 23: 696-701.
  7. Lisowski P, Kannan P, Mlody B, Prigione A (2018) Mitochondria and the dynamic control of stem cell homeostasis. EMBO Rep 19: 45432.
  8. Fu W, Liu Y, Yin H (2019) Mitochondrial Dynamics: Biogenesis, Fission, Fusion, and Mitophagy in the Regulation of Stem Cell Behaviors. Stem Cells Int 2019: 9757201.
  9. Burrill DR, Silver PA (2011) Synthetic circuit identifies subpopulations with sustained memory of DNA damage. Genes Dev 25: 434-439.
  10. Burrill DR, Inniss MC, Boyle PM, Silver PA (2012) Synthetic memory circuits for tracking human cell fate. Genes Dev 26: 1486-1497.
  11. Burrill DR, Silver PA (2011) Recording cellular experiences of DNA damage. Cell Cycle 10: 2410-2411.
  12. Cheikhi A, Wallace C, St Croix C, Cohen C, Tang WY, et al. (2019) Mitochondria are a substrate of cellular memory. Free Radic Biol Med 130: 528-541.
  13. Hinge A, He J, Bartram J, Javier J, Xu J, et al. (2020) Asymmetrically Segregated Mitochondria Provide Cellular Memory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Replicative History and Drive HSC Attrition. Cell Stem Cell 26: 420-430.
  14. Semon RW (1921) The mneme. G. G. Allen & Unwin ltd., The Macmillan company in London, New York, USA.
  15. Hebb DO (1949) The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory. John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA.
  16. Bliss TV, Lomo T (1973) Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path. J Physiol 232: 331-356.
  17. Malinow R (1991) Transmission between pairs of hippocampal slice neurons: Quantal levels, oscillations, and LTP. Science 252: 722-724.
  18. Markram H, Lübke J, Frotscher M, Sakmann B (1997) Regulation of synaptic efficacy by coincidence of postsynaptic APs and EPSPs. Science 275: 213-215.
  19. Bi GQ, Poo MM (1998) Synaptic modifications in cultured hippocampal neurons: Dependence on spike timing, synaptic strength, and postsynaptic cell type. J Neurosci 18: 10464-10472.
  20. Ryan TJ, Roy DS, Pignatelli M, Arons A, Tonegawa S (2015) Engram Cells Retain Memory Under Retrograde Amnesia. Science 348: 1007-1013.
  21. Josselyn SA, Tonegawa S (2020) Memory engrams: Recalling the past and imagining the future. Science 367.
  22. Hebert-Chatelain E, Desprez T, Serrat R, Bellocchio L, Soria-Gomez E, et al. (2016) A cannabinoid link between mitochondria and memory. Nature 539: 555-559.
  23. Fu Z-X, Tan X, Fang H, Lau P-M, Wang X, et al. (2017) Dendritic mitoflash as a putative signal for stabilizing long-term synaptic plasticity. Nature communications 8: 1-12.
  24. Kriebel M, Ebel J, Battke F, Griesbach S, Volkmer H (2020) Interference With Complex IV as a Model of Age-Related Decline in Synaptic Connectivity. Front Mol Neurosci 13: 43.
  25. Itoh H, Kurihara I, Miyashita K (2018) Organ memory: A key principle for understanding the pathophysiology of hypertension and other non-communicable diseases. Hypertension Research 41: 771-779.
  26. Sharples AP, Stewart CE, Seaborne RA (2016) Does skeletal muscle have an 'epi'-memory? The role of epigenetics in nutritional programming, metabolic disease, aging and exercise. Aging cell 15: 603-616.
  27. LeRoith D, Fonseca V, Vinik A (2005) Metabolic memory in diabetes--focus on insulin. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 21: 85-90.
  28. Brown R, Silva AJ (2004) Molecular and cellular cognition; the unraveling of memory retrieval. Cell 117: 3-4.

Citation: Cheikhi A (2020) On the Substrate of Memory: Engram and Mitoengram. J Gerontol Geriatr Med 6: 050.

Copyright: © 2020  Amin Cheikhi, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

© 2021, Copyrights Herald Scholarly Open Access. All Rights Reserved!