Case # |
Diagnosis and Grade of ptosis |
Primary (P)orSecondary (S) |
Implant cc (right) |
Implant |
1 |
3 |
P |
100 |
100 |
2 |
1 |
P |
125 |
125 |
3 |
1 |
P |
125 |
125 |
4 |
2 |
P |
125 |
125 |
5 |
Pseudoptosis |
P |
125 |
125 |
6 |
1 |
P |
150 |
175 |
7 |
1 |
P |
150 |
175 |
8 |
1 |
S |
150 |
150 |
9 |
3 |
P |
150 |
150 |
10 |
pseudoptosis and gr 3 contracture |
S |
150 |
150 |
11 |
2 |
P |
175 |
175 |
12 |
3 |
P |
175 |
200 |
13 |
3 |
P |
175 |
150 |
14 |
3 |
P |
175 |
175 |
15 |
pseudoptosis |
P |
175 |
175 |
16 |
2 |
P |
200 |
200 |
17 |
2 |
P |
200 |
200 |
18 |
3 |
P |
200 |
200 |
19 |
1 |
P |
225 |
225 |
20 |
2 |
P |
225 |
250 |
21 |
2 |
P |
225 |
225 |
22 |
Pseudoptosis |
P |
225 |
225 |
23 |
2 |
P |
250 |
250 |
24 |
2 |
P |
250 |
250 |
25 |
2 |
P |
250 |
250 |
26 |
2 |
P |
250 |
250 |
27 |
3 |
P |
250 |
250 |
28 |
3 |
P |
250 |
250 |
29 |
capsule contracture, malposition |
S |
250 |
250 |
30 |
capsule contracture |
S |
250 |
250 |
31 |
2 |
P |
275 |
250 |
32 |
pseudoptosis and gr 3 contracture |
S |
275 |
275 |
33 |
1, malposition |
S |
300 |
300 |
34 |
1 |
P |
300 |
300 |
35 |
pseudoptosis and gr 3 contracture |
S |
350 |
350 |
36 |
Pseudoptosis |
S |
400 |
400 |
Descriptive Statistics |
|||||
|
N |
Minimum |
Maximum |
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
Implant cc R |
36 |
100 |
400 |
211,81 |
67,476 |
Implant cc L |
36 |
100 |
400 |
213,19 |
66,409 |
Valid N (listwise) |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Primary (P) and Secondary (S) Groups |
Implant cc R |
Implant cc L |
|
Primary group |
N |
28 |
28 |
Mean |
196,43 |
198,21 |
|
Std. Deviation |
53,017 |
51,787 |
|
Secondary group |
N |
8 |
8 |
Mean |
265,63 |
265,63 |
|
Std. Deviation |
87,564 |
87,564 |
|
Total |
N |
36 |
36 |
Mean |
211,81 |
213,19 |
|
Std. Deviation |
67,476 |
66,409 |
Group Statistics |
|||||
|
Primary (P) or Secondary (S) |
N |
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
Std. Error of Mean |
Implant cc R |
Primary |
28 |
196,43 |
53,017 |
10,019 |
Secondary |
8 |
265,63 |
87,564 |
30,958 |
|
Implant cc L |
Primary |
28 |
198,21 |
51,787 |
9,787 |
Secondary |
8 |
265,63 |
87,564 |
30,958 |
Case # |
Revision performed for |
Major postoperative complications |
Minor postoperative complications |
1 |
Widened scar |
Widened scar |
|
5 |
Asymmetry |
Mild Asymmetry |
|
7 |
Mild Asymmetry |
||
9 |
Mild Asymmetry |
||
10 |
Wound opening managed by operation + asymmetry |
||
11 |
Mild sagging |
||
13 |
Mild sagging |
||
14 |
Mild sagging |
||
16 |
Implant exposure |
||
17 |
Asymmetry |
Asymmetry |
|
23 |
Hematoma |
||
25 |
Mild sagging |
||
26 |
Mild Asymmetry |
||
27 |
Wound problem with secondary healing |
||
28 |
Mild sagging |
||
32 |
Implant exposure |
||
33 |
Capsule contracture gr 3 + asymmetry |
Capsule contracture grade 3 + asymmetry |
|
35 |
Asymmetry |
Wound problem with secondary healing + asymmetry |
Crosstab |
|||||
|
Revision performed |
Total |
|||
No |
Yes |
||||
Grade of ptosis |
Grade 1 |
Count |
7 |
1 |
8 |
% within Grade of ptosis |
87,5% |
12,5% |
100,0% |
||
% of Total |
19,4% |
2,8% |
22,2% |
||
Grade 2 |
Count |
10 |
1 |
11 |
|
% within Grade of ptosis |
90,9% |
9,1% |
100,0% |
||
% of Total |
27,8% |
2,8% |
30,6% |
||
Grade 3 |
Count |
7 |
1 |
8 |
|
% within Grade of ptosis |
87,5% |
12,5% |
100,0% |
||
% of Total |
19,4% |
2,8% |
22,2% |
||
Pseudoptosis |
Count |
7 |
2 |
9 |
|
% within Grade of ptosis |
77,8% |
22,2% |
100,0% |
||
% of Total |
19,4% |
5,6% |
25,0% |
||
Total |
Count |
31 |
5 |
36 |
|
% within Grade of ptosis |
86,1% |
13,9% |
100,0% |
||
% of Total |
86,1% |
13,9% |
100,0% |
Crosstab |
|||||
|
Major postoperative complications |
Total |
|||
No |
Yes |
||||
Grade of ptosis |
Grade 1 |
Count |
7 |
1 |
8 |
% within Grade of ptosis |
87,5% |
12,5% |
100,0% |
||
% of Total |
19,4% |
2,8% |
22,2% |
||
Grade 2 |
Count |
8 |
3 |
11 |
|
% within Grade of ptosis |
72,7% |
27,3% |
100,0% |
||
% of Total |
22,2% |
8,3% |
30,6% |
||
Grade 3 |
Count |
8 |
0 |
8 |
|
% within Grade of ptosis |
100,0% |
0,0% |
100,0% |
||
% of Total |
22,2% |
0,0% |
22,2% |
||
Pseudoptosis |
Count |
6 |
3 |
9 |
|
% within Grade of ptosis |
66,7% |
33,3% |
100,0% |
||
% of Total |
16,7% |
8,3% |
25,0% |
||
Total |
Count |
29 |
7 |
36 |
|
% within Grade of ptosis |
80,6% |
19,4% |
100,0% |
||
% of Total |
80,6% |
19,4% |
100,0% |
Crosstab |
|||||
|
Minor postoperative complications |
Total |
|||
No |
Yes |
||||
Grade of ptosis |
Grade 1 |
Count |
7 |
1 |
8 |
% within Grade of ptosis |
87,5% |
12,5% |
100,0% |
||
% of Total |
19,4% |
2,8% |
22,2% |
||
Grade 2 |
Count |
8 |
3 |
11 |
|
% within Grade of ptosis |
72,7% |
27,3% |
100,0% |
||
% of Total |
22,2% |
8,3% |
30,6% |
||
Grade 3 |
Count |
2 |
6 |
8 |
|
% within Grade of ptosis |
25,0% |
75,0% |
100,0% |
||
% of Total |
5,6% |
16,7% |
22,2% |
||
Pseudoptosis |
Count |
8 |
1 |
9 |
|
% within Grade of ptosis |
88,9% |
11,1% |
100,0% |
||
% of Total |
22,2% |
2,8% |
25,0% |
||
Total |
Count |
25 |
11 |
36 |
|
% within Grade of ptosis |
69,4% |
30,6% |
100,0% |
||
% of Total |
69,4% |
30,6% |
100,0% |
Crosstab |
|||||
|
Total postoperative complications |
Total |
|||
No |
Yes |
||||
Grade of ptosis |
Grade 1 |
Count |
6 |
2 |
8 |
% within Grade of ptosis |
75,0% |
25,0% |
100,0% |
||
% of Total |
16,7% |
5,6% |
22,2% |
||
Grade 2 |
Count |
5 |
6 |
11 |
|
% within Grade of ptosis |
45,5% |
54,5% |
100,0% |
||
% of Total |
13,9% |
16,7% |
30,6% |
||
Grade 3 |
Count |
2 |
6 |
8 |
|
% within Grade of ptosis |
25,0% |
75,0% |
100,0% |
||
% of Total |
5,6% |
16,7% |
22,2% |
||
Pseudoptosis |
Count |
5 |
4 |
9 |
|
% within Grade of ptosis |
55,6% |
44,4% |
100,0% |
||
% of Total |
13,9% |
11,1% |
25,0% |
||
Total |
Count |
18 |
18 |
36 |
|
% within Grade of ptosis |
50,0% |
50,0% |
100,0% |
||
% of Total |
50,0% |
50,0% |
100,0% |
Group Statistics |
|||||
|
Revision performed for |
N |
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
Std. Error Mean |
Implant cc R |
No |
31 |
211,29 |
61,182 |
10,989 |
Yes |
5 |
215,00 |
108,397 |
48,477 |
|
Implant cc L |
No |
31 |
212,90 |
59,816 |
10,743 |
Yes |
5 |
215,00 |
108,397 |
48,477 |
Group Statistics |
|||||
|
Major postoperative complications |
N |
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
Std. Error Mean |
Implant cc R |
No |
29 |
203,45 |
65,712 |
12,202 |
Yes |
7 |
246,43 |
68,357 |
25,836 |
|
Implant cc L |
No |
29 |
205,17 |
64,566 |
11,990 |
Yes |
7 |
246,43 |
68,357 |
25,836 |
Group Statistics |
|||||
|
Minor postoperative complications |
N |
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
Std. Error Mean |
Implant cc R |
No |
25 |
223,00 |
70,312 |
14,062 |
Yes |
11 |
186,36 |
55,186 |
16,639 |
|
Implant cc L |
No |
25 |
225,00 |
68,465 |
13,693 |
Yes |
11 |
186,36 |
55,186 |
16,639 |
Group Statistics |
|||||
|
Total postoperative complications |
N |
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
Std. Error Mean |
Implant cc R |
No |
18 |
213,89 |
70,826 |
16,694 |
Yes |
18 |
209,72 |
65,943 |
15,543 |
|
Implant cc L |
No |
18 |
216,67 |
68,599 |
16,169 |
Yes |
18 |
209,72 |
65,943 |
15,543 |
Crosstab |
|||||
|
Revision performed for |
Total |
|||
No |
Yes |
||||
Primary (P) or Secondary (S) |
Primary |
Count |
25 |
3 |
28 |
% within Primary (P) |
89,3% |
10,7% |
100,0% |
||
% of Total |
69,4% |
8,3% |
77,8% |
||
Secondary |
Count |
6 |
2 |
8 |
|
% within Primary (P) |
75,0% |
25,0% |
100,0% |
||
% of Total |
16,7% |
5,6% |
22,2% |
||
Total |
Count |
31 |
5 |
36 |
|
% within Primary (P) |
86,1% |
13,9% |
100,0% |
||
% of Total |
86,1% |
13,9% |
100,0% |
Crosstab |
|||||
Major postoperative complications |
Total |
||||
No |
Yes |
||||
Primary (P) or Secondary (S) |
Primary |
Count |
25 |
3 |
28 |
% within Primary (P) Secondary (S) |
89,3% |
10,7% |
100,0% |
||
% of Total |
69,4% |
8,3% |
77,8% |
||
Secondary |
Count |
4 |
4 |
8 |
|
% within Primary (P)Secondary (S) |
50,0% |
50,0% |
100,0% |
||
% of Total |
11,1% |
11,1% |
22,2% |
||
Total |
Count |
29 |
7 |
36 |
|
% within Primary (P)Secondary (S) |
80,6% |
19,4% |
100,0% |
||
% of Total |
80,6% |
19,4% |
100,0% |
Crosstab |
|||||
|
Minor postoperative complications |
Total |
|||
No |
Yes |
||||
Primary (P) or Secondary (S) |
Primary |
Count |
17 |
11 |
28 |
% within Primary (P) |
60,7% |
39,3% |
100,0% |
||
% of Total |
47,2% |
30,6% |
77,8% |
||
Secondary |
Count |
8 |
0 |
8 |
|
% within Primary (P) |
100,0% |
0,0% |
100,0% |
||
% of Total |
22,2% |
0,0% |
22,2% |
||
Total |
Count |
25 |
11 |
36 |
|
% within Primary (P) |
69,4% |
30,6% |
100,0% |
||
% of Total |
69,4% |
30,6% |
100,0% |
Crosstab |
|||||
|
Total postoperative complications |
Total |
|||
No |
Yes |
||||
Primary (P) or Secondary (S) |
Primary |
Count |
14 |
14 |
28 |
% within Primary (P)Secondary (S) |
50,0% |
50,0% |
100,0% |
||
% of Total |
38,9% |
38,9% |
77,8% |
||
Secondary |
Count |
4 |
4 |
8 |
|
% within Primary (P)Secondary (S) |
50,0% |
50,0% |
100,0% |
||
% of Total |
11,1% |
11,1% |
22,2% |
||
Total |
Count |
18 |
18 |
36 |
|
% within Primary (P)Secondary (S) |
50,0% |
50,0% |
100,0% |
||
% of Total |
50,0% |
50,0% |
100,0% |
Citation: Anlat?c? R (2019) Our Experiences with Bi-Planar Mastopexy-Augmentation, J Surg Curr Trend Innov 3: 019.
Copyright: © 2019 Recep Anlatici, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.