Solomon, Jesus, Muhammad, Newton, Mayans, Einstein and others: A sincere message to humanity

BML: Biomaterial

BIFL: Biointerfacemal

BEL: Bioenergemal

BEG: Bioenergeme

BELC: Bioenergemal Communication

UU: Unit Universe

NMEGO: Neuromindego

BELR: Bioenergemal Research

Ints: Intuitions

Before our era: boe

In the BELC of May 2, 2008, we outlined the general stages that the idea of deity could have gone through in the history of the ancestral cultures with which we biocommunicate. (Inviting such cultures according to the name by which they are known geographically and/or in specialized studies.) Namely: 1. The idolatrous stage. 2. Human deification. 3. The monotheistic supernatural deity with which the idea culminates; and 4. The decline of the idea of deity, which begins when some societies chaotically intermix the first three stages. 

1. To address the idolatrous stage, we invited BEGs from the community or communities where the idea of worshipping a plant, animal, mineral, or cosmic biotagonist as a deity –or deities– first emerged. An unidentified community of BEGs presented themselves, which did not clearly relate to any of the communities we invited. 2. Stage of human deification. We invited BEGs from the community or communities where the idea of human deification first emerged. That is, when some humans first began to see and/or be seen as deities or to represent deities in human form and with (mixed) behaviors, both natural and supernatural in humans. A community of BEGs also presented themselves –also unidentified– who did not clearly relate to any of the populations we invited, although the Egyptian communities approached them. 3. Stage of the supernatural deity or culmination of the development of the idea of the deity expressed in monotheism. We invited ancestral BEGs from the community or communities where the idea of the single, abstract supernatural deity or monotheism first emerged to present. A community—unknown to us—of BEGs also presented their presentations, which did not clearly relate to any of the communities we invited, although the Sumerian, Egyptian, and Israelite communities were close to them. 4. Stage of the decline of the idea of the deity, characterized by the chaotic mixture of the three previous stages. The idea no longer held water. At this BEG, the BEGs were already present, among whom the idea of hybridization or incoherent mixture of the three previous stages emerged: idolatry, human deification, and the supernatural deity. Siddhartha Gautama Buddha, Muhammad, Jesus, and other BEGs participated in this discussion. –Gautama, founder of Buddhism: You're right about what you just expressed regarding the decline of the idea of human deification. In that theater we created, in which I tried to get my followers to seek their internal communication, the only result was that in that search, the NMEGO only remained in a monologue with itself. And so, we stopped all possibilities for humans to know themselves, then and now. –Muhammad, prophet of Islam: Once again, thank you for allowing me to comment that, indeed, worshipping, idolizing, and forcing other humans to consider us as human deities is an atrocious idea, destructive toward our biospecies and toward nature. It is a senseless idea and is only for the pleasure of a lost NMEGO far from its BEG. That's how I understand it now, and I understand it well. –Jesus, founder of Christianism: I accept what you [Gautama and Muhammad] mention and the moment in which we have participated and have caused humans to limit their existence by allowing themselves to be guided by humans, like me, whose NMEGO has created lies and I have taught others to lie. However, we could not express the deception in any other way because we did not know how to understand humans. I accept the decadent stage of the idea of deity into which we fell and I celebrate that we can all now learn to biocommunicate with our BEGs and with nature. I invite the human NMEGO to rid of itself of all this harmful influence.

BELC 05/02/2008. Cain and Abel. As expected, we invited Cain and Abel's BEGs. They greeted each other, hugged, and commented that in the BEL universe they've been able to get closer, and Cain was able to tell his brother “How much I admire and respect you. And how sorry I am that my NMEGO betrayed me to hurt my brother. Indeed, envy is a product of the NMEGO." For his part, Abel affirmed that he knew this and that "that's why there was no resentment." We told him that this was Abel's characteristic nobility, and they clarified: –Abel: That is the characteristic nobility of my father. –Cain: "I accepted my mother's hostility." Cain and Abel smiled as they realized why their behavior was so different from each other. They bonded: "Now we are both like our father."

By this time, harmony, cohesion, and empathy had been fully reestablished among all the invited biotagonists, allowing us to establish a simultaneous BELC with prominent BEGs from the Arab and Israeli communities, which we found to be very instructive. In the bioexperience conducted on July 25, 2008, with Ruth at BELC, we invited BEGs, some of them ancestral, primarily from the Israelite (patriarchs and prophets) and Arab (prophet Muhammad, Ibn Battuta, globe-trotter, and Khalil Gibran, writer) communities. Questions I had already written since April 20, 2008. The first question we posed concerned whether the idea of a supernatural deity, or at least whether the most elaborate and measured idea (and later written down and disseminated, among others, by king Solomon), had been raised by Israel's ancestors, especially the Arameans and perhaps even some Sumerian or Egyptian groups. This led them to declare themselves chosen. Patriarch Abraham responded as follows: "Now I can say that at times we may have felt unique in this regard. However, listening to all the guests, it is important to realize that our NMEGO in the BML universe may have overlapped with other communities because we invariably fall into the same errors and foolishness, as well as ask ourselves questions whose answers are not in our NMEGO."

During the bioexperience on February 4, 2008, with Ruth at BELC, we discussed the conflicts in Asia and the Middle East. To address these issues, we invited Golda Meir's BEG. We explained to Golda Meir that, if she agreed, we were interested in asking her a few questions about the conflicts between some countries in Asia and the so-called Middle East. She asked us what the purpose was, and we explained that, in addition to the possibility that some people might eventually biocommunicate with her, as we are now doing, we hoped that her comments would help in some way toward resolving these conflicts. She succinctly replied, "Okay." Regarding the fact that some countries in Asia and the so-called Middle East, such as India, Pakistan, Israel, and Iran, possess or are developing programs to acquire nuclear weapons, she reiterated: "Many of us here disagree, but we know it's a millennia-old historical situation that they cling to for the sake of ideologies of power. Although they maintain it's for reasons of belief, the desire for power has actually increased." From her current BEL perspective, she considered that the real origin of the ancient and seemingly insoluble conflicts in that region of the world "has to do with religious premises and the desire to keep them alive." And as to whether these justifies maintaining the conflict on these grounds, she stated: "Absolutely not. Maintaining this conflict has been absurd, above all, to complement your previous question, at the BEL level, I now tell you that it is doubly absurd, since the attitude of all the peoples who are eager to excel in nuclear weapons demonstrates that they really have no idea of the damage in each BEG." Regarding what this BEL damage is: "It is simply affected," she clarified, "the BEG is left with the after-effects of the experiences of war." Golda considered that pacifying the Middle East: “It is an intense, difficult struggle, and sometimes it seems that foolishness prevails. It seems to me that the fairest thing for all humans, men and women, is that no people continue to create more weapons against themselves. The ideas of the chosen one or the almighty do not exist; they are a deception, the idleness of subjugated peoples. If people were to liberate themselves by accepting their BEG and sensibly conducting themselves towards it, they would have no need for wars, power, or any prejudice.” Finally, she did us intuit that at BELC: "There's a pleasant bioenvironment." Thank you, we told her, and we read her answers to find out if she agreed with them. She added: "I agree, that's what I said. I just want to make the point clear. It's not just the religious background, but also the constant pursuit of power, because the justification can be different for each community. Material resources are no longer for the benefit of the people, but now for their destruction and to determine who is the victor and remains alive. It seems that humans have ceased to be human, and upon realizing that they can assume themselves as deities with apparent immortality, the lives of others no longer matter to them."

Bioexperience conducted on February 10, 2008, with Ruth at BELC. It is written that patriarch Jacob had a dream [Genesis 28:10-19] in which he saw angels ascending and descending from heaven on a ladder. He replied, stating: “I want to clarify first that in the dream they were not angels; that is what I assumed because they were the predominant resources used to describe the dream. Now, intuiting, I tell you that it is the BEG as a resource that helps you understand what was happening at that moment, how, or what happened after the biocollapse or upon biocollapse. That is, how easily the BEG helps you because it is what keeps you alive.” Jacob considered that: “Religions and beliefs have not evolved; they have remained the same. Perhaps they have changed because societies themselves have transformed. But the approaches remain the same and oscillate between good and evil. Between hell and heaven, and all the extremes that derive from these.” Addressing his people and his believers, Jacob stated that: “I want to say, on behalf of all the BEGs gathered here, give yourselves the opportunity to vindicate the NMEGO by accepting your BEG and, above all, learn to intuit so you can help yourself and others.” Raquel, Jacob's wife, added: “I'm grateful that you invited me and that I can share with you everything you've said. This also helps vindicate the BEG.” We told her that she was very kind and affectionate, and that this is reflected in her comment. To which she replied: “You remain the same because the BEG represents bioessence. That's how we all intuit, but sometimes we don't realize it.”

BELC April 20, 2008. Moses: “Any of the positions you mention maintains that bioessence, the BEL energy and the BEG. That is why they have been valid and credible for humans. However, none of them defines and explains with greater certainty what the BEG intuits. I can tell you this now because we have also learned to explain it to ourselves that way, and we agree. This unifies peoples; thus, we would stop exterminating one another, and that need for dominion over what exists could disappear. It would create a need to understand what we have avoided and denied knowing for millennia, from a truly objective and useful perspective for all of unit nature [or nature everywhere].”

BELC July 25, 2008. Gibran, on an individual level, the idea that there is a chosen people has been translated and interpreted into the search for a Messiah. A powerful temptation for any unbridled NMEGO, and an aspiration from which bilious wars arise, under whose impetus everything succumbs and is irrevocably buried. As indeed happens in wars of any kind, whether they are strictly a controversy between the belligerent parties, or holy, ideological, political, economic, scientific, technical, and the list goes on. “What you said is true. I agree with the destruction the human NMEGO has suffered under the supposed desire to be ‘chosen.’ Now we can understand that we all truly have an important role to play as co-participants in the entire unit nature. That we are neither indispensable nor useful under these circumstances, which go against the BEG and therefore the BEL energy. Humans have not wanted to sufficiently question this possibility because the NMEGO traps us in wanting to satisfy the desire for dominance, and at the same time, our BEG wants to rescue us by trying to bring about moments in which we intuit its existence and strength. This ambiguity is what humans have been constantly struggling with.”

Ibn, and all those conflicts, setbacks, rivalries, and calamities stemmed from the emergence of an idea, that of the all-knowing, all-powerful, all-explanatory deity. An idea that germinated in the fertile ground of a self-absorbed NMEGO, incapable of pausing to reflect and, with a little patience, tolerance, and discretion, try to listen to the voice of its BEG, its complement, as they have expressed it. “Another proof of what you just mentioned is what we just witnessed, in what Jesus said. That is, the human NMEGO that wants to remain imprisoned by the ideas that have predominated until now, for the sole satisfaction of the NMEGO, to remain imprisoned, frustrated, and with the same desire for destruction at whatever level and wherever it may be. If humans truly listen to their BEG, at that moment they will feel liberated and with the persistent desire to respect and collaborate with nature in a simple way without the pretense of being chosen or rewarded. Rather, with the conviction of contributing something to benefit others. This is how the BEG manifests itself, like someone sailing on the sea and, carried by the wind that carries ideas, feels free to know that he/she exists and that without wings, he/she can fly, and thanks to his/her simple perception, he/she can simply enjoy his/her freedom. This is how satisfying the BEG is.”

Muhammad, Ibn, and Gibran, it's no surprise that the biological and ideological brothers, through the prophet Muhammad, also prohibited the making of images of the deity and worship of it. Muhammad, speaking on behalf of the three, stated: "Our opinion is that at that time our BEG intuited that it was important to present the deity in this way, so that the place where we stood would remain respected and, therefore, would not be replaced by any human who might want to seize that position, because that would mean our people would fragment and we would be at odds with each other. The idea was to unify." BELC May 7, 2025. "Muhammad, the Apostle of God." Muhammad, do you consider that comment to be aggressive toward you? "Yes, doctor, because it's a way of ignoring our existence, those of us who are so called. I appreciate you taking the blindfold off my eyes." Furthermore, with terminology foreign to your postulates, right? "Yes, doctor, it is adopted as appropriate, according to the interests of others and the particular interests of those who made it." Be well, Muhammad. "A hug, doctor."

Mahavira, and what relationship would there be between religious practices and political practices? That is, it seems that politics emerged first, and then idolatrous religiosity, and they intermingle, never to be separated. Through politics, some beliefs are practiced, and through beliefs, politics is created. Politics and religion seem like the same activity. “Now I can tell you that politics and religion are the same, that the purpose is no different. The only difference is the naming of the participants, but the function of subduing, imposing, deceiving, and dominating others has been imitated in both. The way of speaking and acting varies, but the way of speaking and doing does not [2015]. The same dogma is used, and farce and vanity are used to seemingly uphold norms or agreements that the leaders themselves do not comply with. They only have them [norms and agreements] to subjugate their followers. There are also sanctions that are unfair to the human NMEGO itself, not to mention the BEG. The measures of these sanctions have reached the most aberrant and cruel, and at no point have humans sufficiently questioned them, as they have remained passive.” 

The politician, once anointed as a leader, begins his or her resounding descent into disrepute not only because of the mistakes he or she makes, but also because of the evident inability to meet the almost supernatural expectations he or she has fostered. "I would only add that being in that 'power' and deviating from it also implies enrichment or abuse of that power. In other words, the benefit is material, and at no point are they interested in the BEL aspect of the human being." 

As if that weren't enough, because they're sectarian, political parties are like religious brotherhoods. Is it possible that when a politician is chosen in the curiously named process of elections, isn't there a reference to a chosen one, that is, a special and unique being, as some of the practitioners of various doctrines are called? "You're right, the problem you raise is very interesting, especially for the human NMEGO, which doesn't allow itself to question these beliefs or so-called institutions." 

Mahavira, while in other latitudes humans had enthroned deities in the form of animal, plant or mineral biotagonists, humans themselves finally succumbed to the inexorable and sterile temptation of assuming themselves as deities in the form of tsars, shepherds, rabbis, prophets, imams, emperors, brahmins, yogis, apostles, pharaohs, monarchs, preachers, priests, presidents, prime ministers, shamans, sorcerers, saints, lamas, Buddhas, monks, men or women, or through that hybrid, earthly-supernatural deity, the only son of the deity, typical of the most fertile mythologies. Not to mention temples, synagogues, pagodas, ashrams, churches, mosques, convents, monasteries, seminaries, chapels, palaces, congregations, lodges, sects, pantheons, wakes, rosaries, prayers, pilgrimages, secret societies (secret because human deities are special and superior?), incantations, spells, and other similar sites, organizations, or activities. All supported by the usual characters or expressions such as "science is an apostolate," "medicine is a priesthood," "he is a saint," "she is a saint," and other characters or expressions. "You leave me speechless, because you describe very well what has happened over time and how the same ideas have been maintained; only the names of those who assume themselves to be gods and what is necessary to worship, including places and objects, have changed. These have been given life without knowing exactly what is being proposed."

BELC September 5, 2008. Lamas. –What do you want to tell the Tibetan people? –Lamas: “Reincarnation is a concept that has needed to be misunderstood in order to feel freedom and confidence in a better life. But because it is erroneous, and because each and every one of us represents so much, because we are in the BEL universe, and because we know how close you are to us, for all this, we feel great pain that your NMEGOs cannot hear us, for they are faithful to the beliefs they have received. We ask you now to listen to us and be faithful to your BEG; it is the one that gives you freedom, and which many of you have been able to value with great effort, thanks to having temporarily distanced yourself from your NMEGO. The life you are living at this moment is your opportunity to enjoy in every way, and you will be able to know and feel what we can say now when we meet again.” The lamas proved equally elusive in their political-religious discourse, so a couple of years later we would question them again [1].

At the extra BELC held on August 13, 2010, we asked the BEGs present to pay attention to the following intuitions. These paragraphs apply primarily to individuals and communities with specific tendencies toward deification, regardless, as we have heard in recent BELCs, of socioeconomic status, level of education or lack thereof, place of birth, sex, and religious affiliations, or whether they themselves are the subject of their own religious devotion, men or women of any age. 

1) All societies in which the idea of one or more all-powerful deities has emerged and has been fostered have spoken and continue to speak about how their members have considered themselves and continue to consider themselves. By seeing themselves as deities, these men and women assume they are entitled to despise life and living things, biomatter in general. 2) Their work as deities consists of the unedifying activity of destroying, through murder, hunting, cutting down forests and jungles, and exploiting, until their extinction, the natural resources existing wherever they find them. 3) They insist on creating life, which emerged thanks to terrestrial humans, or perpetuating it through cloning, test-tube babies, alleged permanent control of aging, cryogenics or freezing for the preservation of human corpses with the apparent – or utopian – goal of returning them to BML existence when ‘technological advances allow it’, ancestral search for the fountain of eternal youth, possession of supernatural powers, etc. 4) That is to say, the life and existence of humans, as well as all other animals and plants, belongs to them, thus they claim to dispose of them whenever they want or as soon as they find a justification to do so. Even more intransigently, they will exploit mineral deposits until they are exhausted and destroyed. 5) So that if some people name and assume themselves as gods, they are consequently superior beings whose self-given status as deities confers upon them the right to decide not only about their own existence, whether male or female, but especially, of course, about the existence of other humans who do not consider themselves, nor have been allowed, nor are allowed, nor will they, fortunately, be allowed to consider themselves as deities. Who, consequently, are seen as inferior humans, or second-, third-, fourth-, or nth-class, or definitively declassed, and without the slightest possibility of remedying their presumed disadvantageous situation. From there also, and by simple extension, the rise of racism, of ethnicities, of superior or inferior organisms, of the chosen and the fallen, of geniuses, of the normal and the foolish, of the ugly and the pretty, etc., etc. 6) A widespread ideological prejudice holds that a person's biocollapse (death) is decided by ‘divine ‘mandate.’ That is, by some deity. It was their turn; it is customary to say. Therefore, deities, or in this case, the deified, male or female, can biocollapse others or grant a pardon, sparing lives. Taking lives –a euphemism for biocollapsing others– is therefore assumed to be an act proper to those deified and justified by their deified origin and purpose. Whether it be homicides by commission or punishment for serious breaches of doctrinal precepts, holy wars or wars sanctified by the deified, against adversaries or enemies, invariably accused of being guided by the forces of evil. The pretext is irrelevant; what matters is that those who claim to belong to the group of the deified exercise, individually or collectively, the power to spare the lives or biocollapse others, whenever they so choose and with the most effective means to achieve their purpose. 7) To maintain their status as deities, it is essential that humanity, within the UU, only exist on planet Earth. Otherwise, without geocentrism, anthropocentrism becomes not only obsolete but ultimately ridiculous and blatantly foolish. Therefore, all existing evidence about humans from other civilizations who visit and have visited Earth must be hidden, denied, discredited, discarded, forgotten, and their human status denied, since it is exclusive to Earthlings. If by chance they come across an extraterrestrial ship, the only thing they were taught to say is "that's not terrestrial." This is an example of the mythomania known as vox populi vox Dei, or the voice of the people is the voice of God. 8) The effect of the Tartuffes, their misdeeds, libels, pamphlets, sects, and institutionalized religious businesses has been to provoke a pandemic of sexual abuse of minors, adolescents and adults, women and men, in all latitudes of the world. So, no one can give even an approximate figure of how many cases of child sexual abuse are committed every day throughout human society. 9) Sexual abuse suffered in childhood generates deep existential resentment, permanently and inevitably burdening and ruining existence. The sexual abuse of women of childbearing age leads to the birth of those unjustly called illegitimate children, whether girls or boys. Social illegitimacy generates more resentment. Sexual abuse suffered in childhood, coupled with the social condition of illegitimacy, forms an unpleasant mess characterized by uncontrollable existential discontent. This discontent often screams out its anger, provoking more sexual abuse, even serial ones, more illegitimate children, kidnappings, massacres, wars, exterminations, genocides, inquisitions, discrimination, racism, vandalism, serial femicides and masculinicides, religions without female priests, and also more military action to control these reactions. Likewise, the messianic sentiment that leads them to feel chosen and to form sects or brotherhoods of any denomination allows them to control their followers through threats, fear, unmitigated abuse, kidnappings, plunder, robbery, and crimes. 10) The biosyndrome I'm about to describe has spread to every corner of the globe. It's a tragedy that, like fractals, is self-generating; all it takes is for a Tartuffe to commit the first sexual abuse of infants to anticipate the subsequent emergence of sexual abusers, male or female. 11) Thus, without religion, deification becomes an act of undeniable foolishness. Therefore, it's not in the interest of those deified, as we've heard in the latest BELCs, to deny the ideology of the deity, even though they possess –and exclude its application– the natural capacity (BEG, Intuilish) and the technical resources (mass media) to do so. Thus, they avoid, while awake, the evidence (BELC) that is before their faces, and, during the night, the denunciation of their own dreams. Before the BELC, to say the least, deification is seriously questioned. 12) Based on the data we have obtained from those dedicated to this activity, men and women, with whom we have biocommunicated, and also based on the previous approaches, I believe we are in a position to formulate and describe the BEL syndrome or biosyndrome of terrestrial human deification and, surely, of other civilizations (of course, with its own peculiarities). Some of the characteristics and consequences of the biosyndrome of terrestrial human deification, individual or collective, are the following: 12.1 They gave rise to religions –without female priestesses– in all their variants, which is why they are forced to demonstrate strong religious attachments and to religions –and to denigrate non-believers. Developing a complex infrastructure for the exercise of rituals and the congregation of parishioners. Along with a hierarchy of practitioners whose dedication absorbs their entire existence, and experts from whom emanate thoughtful arguments to cement their own doctrinal creation. 12.2 They invented the idea of the deity or deities, which they falsely attributed and continue to attribute –also as their own– to the ancestral communities of every corner of the world they have spoiled, ruining their culture. Thus, they impose their beliefs. 12.3 Explicit or implicit, staunch defense of geocentrism and anthropocentrism. 12.4 Their addiction to politics and their thirst for power are intense. 12.5 They require an enormous and well-equipped military to sustain their excessive pretensions and overflowing ambitions. They also use them to protect their insecure and distressing status as false untouchables. 12.6 They also require an obese bureaucracy of experts in the most varied disciplines, be they science, technology, literature, arts, philosophy, and, of course, theology. All at their service and for their glory, and for the achievement of their ends and whims. They also use them to try to demonstrate their omnipotent status. However, the self-important, and their clique of self-important experts as well, when they give an opinion, pass judgment, or expound on what they are supposed to know, pontificate and give the impression of being convinced that what they say is not only something exceptionally important and unique, but the very essence of true, supreme, sublime knowledge. 12.7 Interest in hoarding trivialities, luxuries, and amassing enormous fortunes, without themselves, men or women, knowing exactly why, except to continue harming others. This is what they learned as children, and this is how they continue to repeat it, acting like articulated robots, supported by their respective primary neural connections. 12.8 They need the idea of deity to justify, as divine design, the advantageous situation of the wealthy and powerful, and the disadvantaged situation of the needy and subordinate. 12.9 A taste for philanthropy as a business, and also as a way of making themselves shine by highlighting the difference between the powerful superior humans and the indispensable helpless inferior humans: cheap labor. 12.10 They kidnap defenseless people to sexually abuse them, for profit, to exploit them through prostitution, or to sell the kidnapped person's organs to the highest bidder. 12.11 They are inclined to commit serial crimes because they feel inclined to do so, and it often even seems pleasurable to some of the deified individuals, both men and women. 12.12 Serial sexual abuse, supported by their own insane self-importance, whether male or female. These acts lead to the birth of illegitimate children, boys or girls, who will suffer from the individual or collective biosyndrome of illegitimacy. 12.13 They themselves may have been victims of sexual abuse in childhood, with a tendency toward revictimization and victimizing other people, men and/or women. Due to the combination of resentment and need for acceptance, they often expose themselves to rejection through inappropriate, insistent, hasty, pompous, pretentious, and/or fearful participation, which comes across as aggressive and/or out of place for others. In this way, they revictimize themselves and attack others. 12.14 Addiction to all kinds of legal (i.e., alcoholic beverages, tobacco, sugar, fat) and illegal drugs. 12.15 They may also be burdened by the social background of being illegitimate children, with their tendency toward revictimization and the victimization of other people, both men and women. 12.16 Their status as autocratic deities presumably authorize them to commit all kinds of grievances and atrocities, abuses, wars, pollution, and the wanton destruction of ecosystems. 12.17 They feel fully entitled to wipe out any settlers they consider inferior. As has happened and continues to happen with the ancestral and original communities of the American continent, Europe, Africa, Asia, Indonesia, the Middle and Far East, Australia, and Oceania. That is, anywhere on the globe they find them, crushing their cultural contributions, customs, and traditions and imposing their own, which they call ‘colonizing.’ They similarly attack those who do not share their own religious beliefs and lifestyle, whom they immediately label as their adversaries or enemies. 12.18 They tend to provoke wars to expand their areas of influence and consolidate their hegemony, which they always assume is threatened, or so they say, by other humans or communities of equally deified humans. Of course, always with the meager justification of preserving their interests and achieving their goals against an enemy whose main characteristic lies in the differences they proclaim from other deified humans and/or in their quest to deify themselves as well. Defending peace, democracy, and freedom are some of the worn-out pretexts they use to repress populations. 12.19 They are the same people who have invaded territories, committed genocide and culturicide against the original communities of those places, and imposed, through force of arms, their rubbish thoughts and junk knowledge. They have also taken over part or all of those territories and divided and fragmented them, giving rise to, and fostering, conflicts among the inhabitants of those places. That is, with ease and under any pretext, they dispose at will of the BML existence of anyone and anything, be it animals, plants, minerals, or humans. Of the entire planet Earth, to put it briefly, according to the common usage of this revealing charactheme or expression [2]. 12.20 Development of a notable capacity for mythomania, marketing, advertising, and grape harvesting, as well as for disqualifying others, which is the same as mythomania transformed into the business of those who are impostors –Tartuffes– and kleptomaniacs. 12.21 Overestimation and arrogance, which follow the relentless principle that the end justifies the means. 12.22 The greed for awards and recognition can be their existential motivation and, in turn, a common form of manipulation. 12.23 Plagiarism and theft of ideas and goods of all kinds can be their modus operandi, using illicit applications of so-called reverse engineering –and now (2025) artificial intelligence– to cover up their thefts. 12.24 Their favorite phrase is: 'He who is not with me is against me.' A characteristic that, of course, the wicked and reticent Jesus perpetuated, the main and prominent representative of the biosyndrome of human deification, precisely; along with his mother and his putative father or stepfather. 12.25 Of course, they are supposed to deserve homage, worship, and veneration. 12.26 Each of these characteristics, and even more so the combination of them, defines deified humans as authentic Tartuffes, men and/or women. Therefore, they are addicted to hypocrisy, to imposture. 12.27 Because the biosyndrome of individual or collective deification is so obvious, evident, widespread, and ancient, they have made it incontestable. 13) It is very difficult for the NMEGO not to fall into, and stumble upon, this biosyndrome... 

Human deification is the immediate effect of the deification of his/her NMEGO, which in the BML universe causes the human to ignore his/her BEG, and for the latter to become disoriented upon arriving in the BEL universe, without knowing what role human BEGs are to play there; and then, to yearn indefinitely for the BML universe. Eager to rectify what they did and reproach themselves for what they didn't do, and envious of those still in the BML universe. They end up lethargic and not knowing what to expect, since nothing they were repeatedly told turned out to be true. They were in these circumstances when the BELC came to their rescue, revitalized them, and opened the possibility of biocommunicating with other BEGs from the same BEL universe and, of course, from the BML universe [Ints 03/13/2019 and 04/19/2025].

Having previously proposed it, at the BELC held on May 7, 2010, we invited the BEGs of Solomon, of Jesus, the BEGs of the Mayan people and their notables, Muhammad, Michel Nostradamus, and Isaac Newton. They all greeted us cordially. Another invited BEG was Cesar M, who hugged my BEG and remarked, “We breathe BEL energy here.” We also invited the BEGs of Niccolò Machiavelli (diplomat), Franz Kafka (writer), Dante Alighieri (writer), and the four-year-old Katy G and her parents, she recently kidnapped in Querétaro, Mexico. 

The BEGs at the assembly were very enthusiastic, waving a small white flag and shouting: “Yes, we can! Yes, we can!” Abdus Salam (physicist): “Yes, BELC can be carried out; we can bio-observe better now.” We asked Dante what he argued about the use of a derivative of his name, i.e., Dantesque, to describe unpleasant, especially catastrophic, situations. “It's regrettable that a name is used in this way for offensive purposes. My NMEGO named and described a series of parasitic ideas, which I now understand. However, that's no reason to disqualify ideas... It seems to me that the important thing now is that, thanks to BEL research, explanations can be given in this regard...” Dante, it has always seemed to me that the title of your book, The Divine Comedy, contains a subtle irony in referring to comedy. “Doctor Cuevas, I am very pleased that you speak like this. My face [sic] fills with joy, my BEG relives the experience of collective intuition, because, indeed, your intuition, doctor Cuevas, is completely correct. That is why, at the BML time, the writing was a success. Although the human NMEGO didn't know it, the BEG did know that it was intended to ridicule the prejudices about the BEL universe that we were still unaware of.” He shook my BEG's hand, gave him a hug, and added: "Shaking hands is feeling understood by a BEL friend." Previously, in the bioexperience of April 30, 2010, we also made clarifying observations with Niccolò Machiavelli and Franz Kafka regarding the inappropriateness of using people's first names or surnames to describe, judge, denigrate, or determine an action or situation in everyday life or otherwise, as is the case with the epithets derived from their respective surnames: Machiavellian and Kafkaesque. They also disagreed with this practice. 

We urged the bioassembly to help us locate the recently kidnapped girl Katy G. We also urged the BEGs present to try to locate her, find out who kidnapped her, and what condition she was in. Bioassembly: Katy was put into a car, a van. Apparently, they put her to sleep by giving her chloroform to smell. She has now biocollapsed, and her BEG is now in the BEL universe, in the care of Eloísa. –Eloísa gave Katy G a white flower, and the girl decided: "This is for my mommy. Mommy, they distracted me with a very attractive doll." Perhaps now her parents have an idea of who the kidnappers were. Ruth noted that Katy's and her parents' BEGs suspected it was two men and a woman, but they didn't identify them. We comforted the family and suggested that Katy let her parents know through a dream that she was already in the BEL universe. –Katy G: “Doctor, now I’m going to take care of my parents because sometimes they don’t know how to take care of themselves well. I hope my mommy gets pregnant again with my daddy.” You tell her this in her dreams too, Katy. –Katy G: “Yes, doctor.” The BEGs of Taz, a Labrador retriever, and his litter spontaneously approached Katy. 

Solomon, Jesus, the Mayans, Muhammad, and Isaac Newton (physicist), if you agree, we believe that humanity requires you to express your opinions in the manner most appropriate to you when answering the following questions and/or making your own comments. An intense and persuasive media campaign is currently underway, apparently intended to accentuate global chaos by the end of 2012, or at least, as usual, to further frighten humanity, emphasizing the Arab-Israeli conflict. In 2025, the story is once again the same. Everyone agreed to participate, stating, "Yes, doctor." We then suggested to the BEGs of those who have biocollapsed as a result of religious conflicts that they approach any of the aforementioned individuals to convey their intuitions. 

1) We asked Solomon if he considered it necessary or indispensable to destroy a church or mosque and then build, on the same site, a replica of the alleged temple he built (1 Kings 6:1). Later, we will clarify why we speak of the alleged temple that Solomon built. “Hey, doctor! It’s a pleasure to be back in this form of BELC, even more so now because of the manipulation of the different writings that speak of the cruel and violent way in which it manifests itself. Well, that’s how they’ve used you.” He made an effort to bioshout, raised his arms, and added: “There’s no need to further destroy humanity and biomatter through humans or nature! Solomon is only a BEG, and he asks that everyone listen to their own BEG; that’s where the real thing is! Not in a building, not in a stone, but in the bioessence that is the BEL energy! Please, listen, please!” Solomon seemed to affirm his comment with great intensity, truly desperate. “The words, the intuitions, in the Book of Solomon are wrong because the intuitions were diverted by the NMEGO in the search for BEL energy! No more biocollapses! No more failures for the NMEGO. It is important that you can now rectify this together with me, together with Solomon. I would be very grateful if you would listen now!” We read the above –and the same in all the answers– and he pointed out: “That's what I said, and that's my proclamation!” In addition to the strictly doctrinal or religious aspects, what other issues and interests are at stake in this ancient Arab-Jewish conflict, whether they are the interests of the belligerent groups themselves or outside them? “It's a very important question with a very old foundation. The need for power, indoctrination, are used to ensure that only the most powerful remain in power. It's a sign of weakness, of the failure of that objective. The failure of that objective makes them act with anger, with uncontrollable rage, and prove they're right by any means necessary.” What would you and the BEGs of those who have approached you recommend to the groups in conflict to try to find a solution and, thus, calm tempers? “I would recommend that before carrying out execution orders against other humans and nature, using weapons of any kind and accepting the manipulation to which they are being subjected, I would ask you, wholeheartedly, and because I esteem all humans, to enjoy the company of your BEG. This is said by Solomon, who now knows that the BEG exists to harmonize biomatter and that, from the BIFL universe, Solomon asks you to stop biocollapses for nothing or for falsehoods. You can rebel against the manipulation of the powerful; it would be the best action for each one of you and, therefore, for your BEG. Now, the BEGs who are also accompanying Solomon and who have already biocollapsed due to the indoctrination and falsehood with which those who induce warlike actions are covered, we ask, beg, and demand that you listen to us and be able to free yourselves before committing an atrocity that you will later neither forget nor regret. Thank you all for listen to us.” We read the above, and Solomon added: “If you manage to listen to Solomon now, Solomon will be accompanying you bioenergemally wherever you are.” Do you consider there to be a chosen people, or rather, are all peoples equal? “There is no chosen people; all peoples are equal. The chosen people is a deception, an appearance of preference to manipulate, indoctrinate, and alienate the Jewish people, in particular, and the peoples in general, so that only one of them benefits. Because now we can realize that neither the chosen people nor the powerful have truly benefited. Only many credulous or naive people have biocollapsed, and they have and continue to deceive themselves. Those of us who are now in the BEL universe can be BEL witnesses of what we now can say with all firmness and authenticity.” Is there any real possibility that, as the Jewish people hope, a Messiah will come to Earth to rescue his people and reward them in some way for having been faithful to what is written? "For no people, not even the Jewish people, for whom the arrival of a Messiah is very important, there will be such a possibility because there is no way for it to happen. Because in the BEL universe, there is no powerful one either. The Messiah was an invention of the NMEGO to justify its violence and soothe the frustration it experiences at feeling defeated, with no reason to exist." What would you like to say, specifically to the Jewish people and, in general, to humanity? “On the contrary, I wish to express my gratitude to the Jewish people, in particular, and to humanity in general, that the BEL moment I am experiencing right now is liberating and full of joy, as it now allows me to express myself with complete clarity and truth. The BELC is not a game, nor an illusion, nor manipulation; it is the collective vectorization that we BEGs of the BEL universe can now share and be respected in what we say. Finally, I declare that I completely disagree with any action, thought, or allusion that violates or threatens the life of humans, nature, and the UU. I declare myself in favor of the BEL energy, the BEG, and the bioenergemity of the UU, which we do not yet fully respect because we are unaware of it. But I respectfully address everyone, the Jewish people and humanity, asking you to join me and join us in this BEL knowledge. Thank you for listening.” What do you suggest about BELC like the one we're currently carrying out? "The BELC demonstrates the existence of the BEL universe and how it can establish collective vectorization so we can express ourselves freely and update our opinions, rectify our mistakes, and learn to respect BEL energy, the life that doesn't biocollapse. That's Solomon's opinion, doctor Cuevas." What effect have these and perhaps other BELCs had on your BEG? "The BELCs have had a deparasiting of prejudices effect on me, mainly to assume responsibility for our actions in the BML universe and in the BEL universe. Which in turn has caused a feeling of freedom, joy, and tranquility that I had always sought and that I now experience every time I act and speak respectfully and authentically in favor of BEL energy, because these effects ultimately impact my BEG." Would you like to add anything else? “It is important for the Jewish people, as a family, to unite, to take care of themselves, and not fall into provocation so that they themselves are once again the sacrificed, the affected. So that they can now vindicate themselves if they speak out against further violence against themselves or against humanity. Only in this way will they be guided by the truth that their BEG asks them to do, as Solomon has done and will continue to do; all that is required is to speak out against any type of violence against humanity or against nature.” We read the above, and he added: “I agree… It is an honor for me to be able to express myself to humanity. I thank doctor Cuevas for his sincere and authentic participation in the BEL research” [3] [BELC 12/13/2015]. We asked him where the Ark of the Covenant is (Hebrews 9:4), and he categorically and with a smile stated: “Nowhere, because as such it never existed. Some human searches are motivated by the NMEGO with the intention of finding evidence that will, above all, let them know: ‘you were right’. However, what is being argued is false in this case. That is, the search is not necessarily as the NMEGO asks, which is to find evidence to feel proud, which she has won.” 

2) Jesus, is it necessary or indispensable to destroy a church or mosque and then build, on the same site, a replica of the alleged temple built by Solomon? Appearing lazy and listless, he barely allowed himself a few words to answer. “No, it is no longer necessary to destroy the mosque to build Solomon’s temple.” Why is it no longer necessary? “Because the two peoples in conflict, Arab and Jewish, have been deceived, used, to confront and destroy each other, for no real reason. Before they start the war, it’s best to tell them that it’s all been a farce, everything has been false.” Beyond the strictly doctrinal or religious aspects, what other issues and interests are at stake in this ancient conflict, whether they concern the interests of the belligerent groups themselves or others? “Now, primarily material interests are involved, and they are also supported by the parasitic ideas that Mary and Jesus have made and continue to make against those peoples and humanity.” Does the global catastrophe foretold in the Apocalypse of your New Testament have to come to pass? “No, such an atrocity does not have to come to pass. It is a deception I have perpetrated on the people, on humanity, through that writing and other writings I have sought to influence in order to continue confusing humanity. A falsehood, a deception, a mockery cannot come to pass.” Nor should it come to pass. “Indeed, it should not come to pass; there is no reason for it.” What would you, and the BEGs who have approached you, recommend to the groups in conflict to try to find a solution and, thus, calm tempers? “I would advise the peoples in conflict, and all those I have induced to cause this disaster, to know that Jesus lied and that today he asks them to tear up the so-called New Testament, page by page, and in a group of pages. I tell them all to truly listen to their BEG and not allow themselves to be manipulated by anyone who leads them to destruction. ‘In understanding’s light the specters die,’ I can intuit from doctor Cuevas's BEG this phrase that illustrates what is happening.” We invited Robert A. Weinman (sculptor), author of the words quoted by Jesus. “Doctor, we biocommunicate to illustrate the effect that unveiling lies has on fear disappearing, and the truth that produces freedom is discovered.” Jesus, what would you like to tell your parishioners in particular, and humanity in general? “I want to tell my parishioners that it was important for them to know, even though my bioego might oppose it, who Jesus really is and what intrusions I have made against humanity and all my followers. To humanity, I would add to this that it is essential that the BELC help clarify the falsehoods and causes of confusion, and thus avoid continuing to destroy humanity.” Is there any real possibility that you will return to Earth as the Messiah to rescue your devotees and reward them in some way for having been faithful to your word? Once again, imitating Solomon, he tried to bioshout intensely. "No, it's not possible for me to return to Earth, much less as a Messiah. That's a deception I created to try to control, through fear, all those who would allow themselves to be influenced. There's no such thing as a Messiah, rewarding those who have been my followers." That possibility doesn't exist, hasn't existed, and never will, Jesus. "Indeed, doctor, that possibility hasn't existed, doesn't exist, and never will." What do you suggest about the BELC like the one we're currently carrying out? "...it seems to me like an opportunity to express, to allow the BEG to express itself and to be able to eliminate parasitic ideas, even though the bioego opposes it. And the BELC has also been, is, and will be the means by which BEGs, like doctor Cuevas's, can intuit the truth and what the BEL energy wants to be expressed." And let it be known. "Yes, doctor Cuevas, and let it be known, because it has more biopower than my bioego." Than your weak bioego. "Yes, than my weak bioego, doctor." What effect have this and other BELCs had on your BEG? "Now I can say that they have had a liberating and prejudice-busting effect, which is very necessary for all of humanity." Do you want to add anything else? “Yes, I want to emphasize again that I also completely oppose the disaster that my deceit, my lies, my vanity, my resentment have brought upon humanity. Thank you for helping me cleanse myself and allowing me to speak out like this now.” Why did your bioego decline even further after Robert A. Weinman's participation? "I feel exposed. I feel weak, as I always have been, but I wouldn't admit it." How did you feel about inviting him after you quoted him? "That expressed the evident authenticity of doctor Cuevas, in contrast to the obvious entanglement and lies I've found myself in, and that the truth is finally being revealed." Were you trying to entangle me if I assumed that phrase was mine? "Once again I couldn't achieve it, doctor. All my attempts to entangle you have failed in the face of doctor Cuevas' authenticity." 

I suggested to the invited BEGs with whom we had yet to biocommunicate that we postpone the meeting with them until a subsequent BELC. Also, since the Mayan people were persistently involved in the media campaign we referred to, we invited the Mayans and their notables to accompany us so we could biocommunicate with them on the next occasion. –All remaining BEGs: We agree and appreciate the respect you show us, doctor. –Mayan BEGs: Thank you for listening to us. We also want to express our opinion. We live in a group, or there may be a spokesperson. –Through a spokesperson or in a group, as you decide. Your wisdom is currently highly recognized, so your responses will be welcome. 

Our BEGs, Ruth's and mine, were enthusiastic and very satisfied, and we also thanked Madame Curie and Abdus Salam for their important support. After the bioexperience was over, Ruth told me that, during the BELC with Salomon, she had at some point approached Madame Curie and Abdus Salam and asked how much I knew about him. They replied that I knew enough. Ruth intervened, saying that I had frequently alluded to the phrase from Solomon we quoted [Vanity of vanities, all is vanity and chasing after wind (Ecclesiastes 1:2-18)] and asked if he was interested in me remembering it. He replied, "No, that's in the past." At the BELC on May 14, 2010, I asked Salomon if that had happened. Solomon: "That was true, doctor, and I didn't mean to derail the BELC." –We even have a friend named Manelik who feels like a prince, of course, he deserves it. Does our friend's name sound familiar? –Solomon: “Yes, it's a very nice name,” and smiled, as did the bioimage of Manelik's BEG. –It is written that the Queen of Sheba visited Solomon (1 Kings 10:1-13) and, according to the Ethiopian Orthodox Church, she bore Solomon a son named Manelik I.

This BELC continued on May 14 and 16, 2010. Yesterday, I found a rattlesnake in the woods. Ruth commented that Abdus S seemed very familiar with snakes, and Eloísa expressed her dislike of snakes, but when I found her and began taking pictures, they were both vectored with my BEG… Joaquín Capilla (diver) had recently biocollapsed, and on December 27, 2009, we had already biocommunicated with him. “How are you, doctor, biocommunicating again! I feel better and better in the BEL universe. My BEG is getting rid of parasitic ideas more and more and is nourished by BEL energy. The BELCs we had have helped me a lot in achieving this; they were very timely. I congratulate you on the intuitions you have had; they are enlightening about Jesus, Mary, and Joseph.” 

1) The BEGs at the assembly were joyfully applauding and interacting with other biospecies. We welcomed the BEGs of the Mayan people and their notables, such as Pakal Kuy (a Mayan dignitary), who acted as their spokesperson. Is it necessary or essential to destroy a church or mosque and then build, on the same site, a replica of the alleged temple built by Solomon? Pakal Kuy was vectored with the BEG of a quetzal. “It is not necessary for a people who are convinced that their leader guided them based on a certain symbol to now destroy that symbol. This contradicts the orientation and only shows that other NMEGOs are influencing and abusing these peoples so that they destroy each other and thus achieve other ends, which are that neither of the two peoples and their beliefs exist. These two peoples confront each other, exterminate each other, and others are the ones who would remain with that territory.” Does the Mayan calendar, as some so-called experts have interpreted, have a final date on which you supposedly announced a global catastrophe? "No way, doctor. Their interpretation of the Mayan calendar is incorrect. The Mayan calendar describes some events that humanity or Mayan society will carried out, and it is common to the behavior of humanity in general, because those who have led human groups, practically at all times, have been accompanied by the arrogant NMEGO. They are using the Mayan people, doctor, to discredit them and point to them as the ones who predict unfavorable events for humanity. When in reality, it is those of the present who are the scoundrels, the invaders, the bastards, the thieves, the genocidaires, and the discredits of a people whose knowledge only transmitted what its BEG intuited at the time. Regardless of whether its intuition was correct or incorrect, they have no right to use us and assume that what they interpret is correct. Our search was more directed toward the UU, and we didn't know how to express it or how to understand bioenergemally well enough. The entire Mayan people are grateful to doctor Cuevas for this BELC, in which he respectfully questions us and in which we can clarify our own opinions.” Did you date this global catastrophe to December 21, 2012, and does that precise modern date even exist in your calendar? "The intuition you have, doctor, is correctly directed toward the answer. The Mayan calendar does not define dates like this, and that is why we feel it is time to say that we are completely against any intruders who have used the Mayan calendar to define such a date, much less for a catastrophe of this nature. And we are completely against such a catastrophe occurring." Did you have terms for God or deity and for prophecy in the Mayan language? “Again, your intuition is correct, doctor. In the Mayan language, we didn't have the terms God, deity, or prophecy that the invaders have foisted on us for parasitic purposes that only interest them.” Ruth mentioned that at this moment, quetzals, hummingbirds, and other multicolored birds and very beautiful butterflies were flying. I commented that perhaps this was the way the BEL energy made the precise pronouncement of the Mayan people spread throughout the UU, through symbols of freedom like the quetzal, the hummingbird, butterflies, and other biospecies. “Your intuition is correct, doctor. This is how the Mayan people express their cry for freedom, and so does the BEL energy, to the entire UU.” What are they pursuing by using you as a pretext and justification? "These intruders who seek to supplant the Mayan people do not want to assume their own responsibility and intentions of extinction and extermination of humanity and the unity of nature on Earth. That, doctor, refers to sick, very damaged NMEGOs who do not want others to enjoy their freedom." We invited Arturo Horta Montero and showed him a bioscene from our visit to Palenque, Chiapas, and the tomb of Pakal Kuy. Prior to arriving in Palenque, we had already found the fossil heart we have shown you on multiple occasions in the dry riverbed of Teapa, Tabasco, Mexico. “At one time, mammoth hearts were food for humans. Now there's evidence that BEL energy is also like food.” From what you've heard and intuited in recent BELCs, do you opine that from some point on, and also in the present, Mary and Jesus could have influenced your existential future as a Mayan people? “Yes, they could have influenced the future of the Mayan people, being seen as destructive and inhumane.” And contrary to their religious interests. “Indeed, by questioning our own beliefs, which were more directed toward the unit nature and the UU. We wanted to unite with them, with nature and the UU, to understand them. Now we realize, and through the intuitions received from your BEG, doctor, that we failed to understand vectorization as we do now, nor the BEL energy of which the entire UU is a part. All of this, and any other aspect that doesn't align with what Mary and Jesus promoted, has been responsible for distorting, disqualifying, and even destroying them. Fortunately, we now realize that they have been able to do nothing to the UU, since they neither know it nor are they interested.” Nor will they be able to do anything against the UU. “No, they won't be able to. That's right, doctor, they can do nothing against the UU.” In addition to the strictly doctrinal or religious aspects, what other issues and interests are at stake in this ancient Arab-Israeli conflict, whether they are the interests of the belligerent groups themselves or outside of them? “It seems that currently, human interests lie in the supreme god of money, since it was created by the NMEGO and, according to the cycle of those symbols, it speaks of the decline of that symbol. That's why the intruders, usurpers, the gods of money feel very overwhelmed, and they know it, and that's why they are becoming very vulnerable, weakened, and prefer to destroy.” What would you and the BEGs of the Mayan people recommend to the groups in conflict to try to find a solution and, thus, calm things down? Ruth commented that at that moment, the Mayan BEGs were vectoring with the UU. “We tell peoples in conflict to think about their BEG and to intuit from it that a major conflict is unnecessary just to apparently follow the orders of their leaders. The BEL energy of the UU isn't interested in the disaster that humans can cause themselves. If anything, it intends for the BEGs not to retain that bioexperience in their future and to allow themselves, through BEL research, to understand that the disastrous influence that Mary and Jesus have caused, for their own reasons of resentment, is not enough to continue destroying and continuing to destroy themselves. That is what we can tell them, doctor.” What would you like to comment, especially to the various religious groups and, in general, to humanity? “We would like to tell humanity to listen to their BEG and not be led by the NMEGO, which seeks to dominate and subjugate. They don't realize they are being subjugated by others who consider themselves gods and objects of worship. The Mayan people make it very clear that they are against any destruction of humanity and the unit nature.” Is there any real possibility that a Messiah will come or return to Earth to rescue his loyal followers and reward them in some way for having been faithful to what is written? “There is no such messianic representation, nor has it ever existed, nor will it ever exist, because throughout the UU, the different biospecies are autonomous, because that is their nature, the BEL energy.” That is the BEL energy. “Yes, doctor, that is what your BEG has made us intuit, and that is how we can now have a congruent, necessary, and logical explanation.” What do you intuit about the BELC? “We believe that the BELC… is what allows us biointeraction with freedom and with all the possibilities to biovectorize ourselves with the UU. Furthermore, for the first time, we understand that there has been much interference, parasitization, and supplanting to distort the BEL energy.” What effect have these and other BELCs had on your BEG? “The BELCs have had a very gratifying effect of liberation, of deparasiting of prejudices, and of providing a real, authentic explanation of the existence of the UU.” Would you like to add anything else? “Thank you again, doctor Cuevas, for allowing us to express our opinion and express the possibility of humanity rectifying the obviously incorrect interpretations of the Mayan calendar. They were also a people who expanded because acts of belligerence were not predominant. Thank you again, and please accept a warm hug and congratulations from the Mayan people, doctor Cuevas.” Ruth noted that at that moment, a quetzal landed on the right shoulder of my BEG's bioimage, and hummingbirds were circling around us. We invited them to vectorize with them and with Digit's BEGs and other mountain gorillas, who also do not tolerate captivity. A warm hug to the Mayan people and to you, Pakal Kuy, thank you so much for your comments. 

2) We invite the BEGs of the Jewish and Arab peoples. Muhammad, is it necessary or indispensable to destroy any church or mosque and then build, on the same site, a replica of the alleged temple built by Solomon? “Doctor, I desperately need to shout out again, with the possibility that it will echo and at the same time spread, that it is not necessary to destroy the mosque and build Solomon's temple. In reality, you should not continue praising, believing, in Muhammad, because Muhammad was wrong; he stupidly and naively allowed himself to be parasitized by Jesus and Mary. Provoking a disaster, a conflict that did not exist and that has been deteriorating humanity. Muhammad cannot continue to favor destruction. Please, I implore the Arab peoples, and if possible, that the Jewish people listen to me, to stop this massacre, this crushing destruction for Muhammad and for all the BEGs who have fostered this destruction of humanity.” Aside from strictly doctrinal or religious aspects, what other issues and interests are at stake in this ancient Arab-Jewish conflict, whether they are the interests of the belligerent groups themselves or outside them? "I find what the Mayan people said very important, when they mentioned that there is a predilection for money and a desire or fanaticism now toward weapons, whatever they may be. Having weapons in their hands, I can now identify what I felt when I had the Quran in my hands. That is, the Quran was the first weapon that unleashed bloody and unnecessary battles and the thirst for revenge and resentment that has been fostered ever since. That's how I understand it, doctor." From what you've heard and intuited, do you opine that at some point Mary and Jesus might have influenced your existential future? “Indeed, doctor, Mary and Jesus influenced my existential development, interfering and provoking not only the despair Muhammad is experiencing, but what's truly worrying is that this is now a conflict with grave consequences that humanity is experiencing. All because of the supposed idea that the New Testament's principles, which now seem to me to be obvious lies, should not be countered. I regret not having realized this because they led me to find myself in this unfortunate condition. That's right, doctor.” What would you and the BEGs who have approached you recommend to the groups in conflict to try to find a solution and thus calm things down? “Give them an explanation, doctor, like the one your BEG, doctor Cuevas, has suggested to us, and be able to convey to them, through the BELC, that they should please not increase the number of BEGs who live in existential distress. And that they should finally, little by little, listen to their BEG or hear that Muhammad feels distressed. Because if Muhammad felt gratified, they would feel satisfied, and without the need to shed more blood, he would have already made them feel it. The distress they too are experiencing is a reflection of the grave errors that BEGs like Muhammad have committed. I apologize for all the deception, and please, I beg you, stop the armed conflict that I foolishly provoked through the Quran.” Ruth clarified that she suddenly felt the biointensity of Muhammad's words. Muhammad, what would you like to tell your followers in particular, and humanity in general? "Finally, with the help of the BELC, the BEL research, and doctor Cuevas's BEG, we have been able to understand the origin of the entire historical and doctrinal religious disaster facing humanity. Understanding this at this time is very useful, indispensable, because the BEL energy also helps us make the truth transparent so that humanity has the opportunity to choose between the deception that religious leaders like Muhammad, Jesus, and others have spread. Or decide to rectify, first understanding this explanation and then listening to your BEG, who will make you understand that you can prepare for an existence in which you can enjoy life without having to be used by the stupidities committed in the past." Is there any real possibility that you will return to Earth as the Messiah to rescue your faithful and reward them in some way for having been loyal to your word? “This aberrant and deceptive position of the Messiah does not exist. It is a parasitic idea of the arrogant NMEGO that sought to usurp the function of the BEL energy to feel useful and control humanity. It is a parasitic idea because it shows the extent of the ignorance that humans themselves have about the unity of nature and the unity of the universe. Humans have not been able to realize this because they ignore everything about themselves and can only allow themselves to believe such aberrant and stupid parasitic ideas as that of the Messiah, deity, and many others. I am very grateful to doctor Cuevas for being able to explain and give coherence to our own actions and why we decided to receive and write such parasitic ideas in the Quran.” What do you intuit about BELCs like the one we are now carrying out? “For Muhammad, BELCs… are experiencing the biointensity of BEL energy, through which we begin to bioknow the purpose and the reason for that bioforce. And in which humanity is reduced to its own dimension, or minimum real dimension, and it is then that the UU places humanity as an existence, but not an indispensable one.” What effect have this and perhaps other BELCs had on your BEG? “For Muhammad, they have had the effect of deparasiting prejudices and also empowering me, allowing me now, as a BEG, to help and reorient humanity with my opinion. So that they can live their BEL existence in a different way. And only then can I feel that I am part of the UU, without the parasitic ideas of triumph and privilege.” Do you want to add anything else? “Yes, doctor, I'm pleased that my BEG is sensing that, by inviting the BEGs of the Arab and Jewish peoples, their current and former leaders, as well as mentioning humanity, present here, I intuit a tranquility, liberation, because they are biocommunicating. The BEGs of some of them already intuit a little, and we will continue with this constant intensity so that they rectify and Muhammad can feel increasingly reassured that his errors can be rectified. Although Muhammad cannot live truly in peace without assuming personal responsibility for his grave errors. I thank everyone for their support. Thank you again, doctor Cuevas.” 

3) Isaac Newton, is it necessary or essential to destroy a church or mosque and then build, on the same site, a replica of the alleged temple built by Solomon? “Doctor Cuevas, indeed, we are once again biocommunicating with greater intensity, and I will also be guided by the intuitions you have shared with us, especially during the recent BELCs… It is not necessary to destroy the mosque that the Arab people believe has benefited their people and their leader. Nor is it necessary for the Jewish people to continue shedding blood to establish, in the form of a temple, a parasitic idea that the Jewish people have appropriated for themselves because there is no other explanation. It has become clear to all of us here present, and it continues to become more evident that religion is, like all parasitism, a way of complicating, confusing, and destroying the BEG and the NMEGO.” Ruth intuited that Isaac was bio-observing Abdus Salam and Madame Curie. He must have asked them about BEL research... In addition to the strictly doctrinal or religious aspects, what other issues and interests are at stake in this ancient Arab-Jewish conflict, whether they concern the interests of the warring groups themselves or others? “It seems to me that all of us, all of humanity, have been naively parasitized, primarily by Mary and Jesus. This has prevented the discovery of an explanation that would give certainty to what has been unleashed, such as wars and the extermination of humanity, as well as the unit nature on Earth. In this way, all scientific and other knowledge has been parasitized, so as to avoid giving credence and accepting the existence of BEL energy. Because if this happens, as it is, their entire theater collapses. And they are exposed for what they truly represent: betrayal, lies, the parasitization of ideas, the resentment of infamy, sexual abuse, and all the kinds of abuse they have experienced.” From what you've heard and intuited, do you opine Mary and Jesus may have influenced your existential development at some point? "Of course they influenced my existential development. In my case, they eagerly interfered in my dreams so I would confuse my NMEGO, and instead of explaining the forces and bioforces of unity nature and explaining BEL energy or bioenergy, they induced me to approach and practically dedicate myself to them by reading the Bible. Based on this book, they wanted to explain to me the different events that occur in unity nature and in the unity universe, and they induced me to do so in that way. This is how many of the scientific legacies are parasitized, referring to divine forces. Now we understand why the constant parasitization in the different NMEGOs." Do you opine that at some point, Mary and Jesus may have diverted you from continuing to study the understanding of the universe? “Yes, Mary and Jesus influenced me to divert the intuitions I surely had and never wrote down, or I subsequently parasitized them. They are the ones who have parasitized many NMEGOs who have dedicated themselves to bio-observing the cosmos, delegating responsibility for their bad or good luck to others. I'm talking about so-called astrology. Placing humans in a destiny where there is no other possibility than sacrifice, suffering, sin, and penance, among many other parasitizations. How, then, could humanity feel free and leave its prejudices behind, if everything is already defined in existence? Now we understand that, with this redundant behavior, Mary and Jesus, being part of the biosyndrome of the sexually abused and abuser, as doctor Cuevas explained to us, also wanted what happened to them to happen to many other humans. Thus, parasitizing all of unity nature and the cosmos. Frankly, I am ashamed of having largely accepted all these absurd and ridiculous parasitizations. Perhaps on some occasion, or rather, there were occasions when they fell into contradiction, and immediately in my dreams there were messages of fear, and I would once again give myself equally parasitized explanations. What shame this deception represents before myself. At the same time, I feel reassured to know a congruent explanation that also parasitizes unit nature and the UU.” If you made any, do your predictions have to come true? “No prediction I have made can come true because that prediction is part of the existential brilliance of Mary and Jesus. That is, if they want, they can continue to influence humanity; and if humanity allows itself to be influenced and destroys itself, it is not because of what I have written or said, but because humanity continues to be influenced by what Mary and Jesus did, wrote, and influenced. The BEGs who apparently witnessed the supposed Crucifixion of Jesus told us it was because he committed abuses and thefts. That is, Mary and Jesus have tried to hide, disguise, and discredit the history of these humans to appear, by disguising a novel in the Bible, the life of Mary and Jesus.” Did you set a date for the alleged disasters that humanity could face? “No, no date is specified in the legacy I left.” Whoever claims otherwise is completely wrong, and what's more, they would be slandering you. Is that so? "That's right, doctor. It's slander, surely induced equally by the parasitizations of Mary and Jesus. Now I intuit that not having convinced me completely, despite the time I dedicated, has caused them such annoyance that they didn't 'reward' me with sainthood or another similarly parasitized award. That is to say, the recognition wasn't accepted by them either; it's just that I couldn't explain it to them." What would you and the BEGs who have approached you recommend to the groups in conflict to try to find a solution and, thus, calm the tensions? “If the peoples in conflict, one or the other, accept the option of violence, they will be accepting the influence of Mary and Jesus. They will be giving credence to their omens. Or they will be able to recognize their parasitism, or the parasitism and discredit their leaders. That is truly the conflict they will experience. On the other hand, if they choose to stop this useless and absurd belligerent confrontation, they will be helping their leaders and will then be able, through their BEG, to discover the appropriate, congruent explanation that their BEG will biocommunicate to them. Furthermore, it will help them intuit how to arrive at that BEL explanation.” What would you like to comment, specifically, to the various religious groups and, in general, to humanity? “Enough with the rubbish thoughts and junk knowledge. It is important that each of us carry out the BEL function we have learned in the different BELCs and that we rely on them to vindicate our own BEG. It is important that each and every one of us here, at the time we deem appropriate, speak out, as I do now, and that we are totally against any disaster that humanity could, under any pretext, initiate against itself. I am in favor of BEL energy and its forms of biovectorization, as well as the bioforce in which each one manifests.” Is there any real possibility that a Messiah will come or return to Earth to rescue his followers and reward them in some way for having been faithful to what is written? “There is no such thing as a so-called ‘Messiah,’ so to speak. Faithfulness is expressed only when the BEG speaks sincerely. This has been demonstrated by many of the BEGs present here, such as Abdus Salam or Madame Curie. And we can all thus assure you that there is no Messiah, no God, no Savior to whom we can attribute the BEL tranquility. And, as you have already explained to us, doctor, regardless of what humanity decides for its parasitic motives and pretexts, for the UU, the BEL energy is important, not humanity.” What do you intuit, or what do you make us intuit, about the BELCs we're currently carrying out? "BELCs are moments when collective biovectorization intensifies, and the established bioforce is capable of intuiting a BEL explanation from the BEGs, and also influencing them. That's why it's not easily achievable, because in this biovectorization, it's very important to deworm and avoid parasitization or supplantation, so that the BEL explanation can emerge with the necessary collective intuitionability, as it is now." What effect have this and perhaps other BELCs had on your BEG? "BELCs have bioenergemally explained the reason for existence, giving the BEG and bioenergemity the opportunity to continue their existence in a new BEL stage. Without the millennia-old parasitizations with which we have been used and influenced, parasitizing others." Do you want to add anything else? “I would like to thank doctor Cuevas for your explanations, for sharing your intuitions, and for inviting each and every one of us here to speak out against any attempt or declaration of war against humanity. I would also like to thank the BEGs who have supported you at some point, doctor. A warm hug, doctor Cuevas.” We would like to tell you that your sincere and decisive statement is very relevant to many NMEGOs and BEGs of humanity [4].

Next, we invited other BEGs in the assembly to express their opinions on everything they had heard. –Albert Einstein (physicist): “Indeed, doctor, we have been influenced by Mary and Jesus at some point in our lives. And, for my part, I now understand why, first, their insistence on participating in the development of the so-called atomic bomb, and then their apparent recognition of it, halted other kinds of intuitions. I would also like to speak out against the use that has been made and may be made of that contribution I made, or the use of any other form of violence against humanity under any pretext.” You mean that you felt uncomfortable about that same recognition, and perhaps now you intuit it as being manipulated by Mary and Jesus themselves. “That was it, that is how I see it now, and, furthermore, other equally manipulated and manipulative BEGs have joined them.” You intuit, Albert, the discomfort that the achievements of BEGs and NMEGOs, like yours and Isaac Newton's, may have caused in BEGs as limited as those of Mary and Jesus. "Yes, of course, doctor. I now realize that their pettiness and resentment have led to the parasitization and discrediting of NMEGOs and BEGs like Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein, that is, ours." –Louis Pasteur (chemist): "It is fortunate that a vaccine has also been created for BEL parasitizations, since immunity is first created, and from their very lies, the truth is obtained." These BELCs with the BEGs who have lied are a clear example of intuitional biodialogue. "Indeed, doctor, that is what BEL research using the immersion biolens of the BEL study is all about." This bunch of impostors is already starting to flee. “Indeed, doctor, while the parasites allow themselves to be observed and known, these rogue BEGs are hiding.” – Sigmund Freud (physician): “Master, doctor Cuevas, first of all, it is very important that everyone has spoken out against any form of resource that threatens humanity and the unit nature, as I now include myself in that protest and disagreement. And how, through Mary and Jesus, we are beginning to understand the biosyndrome of the sexually abused. That has been the weapon they have used to parasitize and provoke conflict. Indeed, this has had repercussions, having its own effects on the BEL universe, which transforms abuse and betrayal into, let's call it, bioenergization, which has been called BEL vindication. Therefore, it has a bioforce or biointensity that the BEG was unaware of, and, in turn, it recovers it. That makes the pronouncements we hear more authentic. That BEL effect is not controlled by the BEG, but by the BEL energy itself.” It's like a BEL restructuring, a capacity of the BEL energy for the benefit of the BEG. It benefits the BEGs in general who so encourage it, and it weakens the unfavorable responses, as we've heard from the BEGs who exemplify the biosyndrome of the sexually abuse and abuser. "That's right, this BEL effect, this BEL restructuring, has also been favored by collective vectorization and with other biospecies. Because those biospecies don't have those prejudices, those parasitizations." Ruth added that quetzals, hummingbirds, animal, mineral, and plant biospecies manifested their presence, because we recognized their participation. –Madame Curie (physics chemist): "That biointensity has transformed into tranquility. That biointensity is no longer forced and exhausting and continues as a constant." –Abdus Salam (physicist): “The BEL universe is restructuring itself. Indeed, doctor, it is acquiring a transparency produced by BEL empathy.” –BEGs of many doctors. Ruth identified Juan Ramón de la Fuente M, Joseph Luís Patiño, Ignacio Chávez, Ruy Pérez Tamayo, and many others, who acknowledged: “We are convinced of how parasitized we have been, primarily by the influence of Mary and Jesus, thus demeaning life itself by ignoring the BEL energy.” What an irrational eagerness of these bioegos to try to impose their problems on the BEL energy itself. “Indeed, doctor, understanding the problems of these bioegos and how our bioegos allow themselves to be influenced, leads to confusion and the distortion of our intuitions and the BELC that is established with life itself through the human bio-organism. We are, then, participants in this parasitization in the form of omission.” The problem that the parasitic bioenergemes have originated, from which the BEL universe has distanced itself, could ultimately be reduced to a conflict between them. –Eloísa, Abdus Salam, Madame Curie, Albert Einstein, the Actors Guild, and many other BEGs: “That's why we disassociated ourselves from them in time, no longer being part of them or complicit in them. We will continue to engage in collective vectorization.” 

We thanked everyone for their kind presence and participation. We sent them a warm hug, hoping they were all well and that we would continue biocommunicating later. My BEG stated: "There's consistency in the words." Ruth emphasized: "What a wonderful bioexperience, even though it was very tense at times!"

Extra bioexperience on August 13, 2010. Suddenly, although very much in agreement with her definitive biobehavior, Madame Curie expressed a decision about her name. “Doctor, I prefer to be called only Madame Curie.” Would you prefer that we change all references to you and your comments to the name Madame Curie? “Yes, doctor, my name ‘Marie’ is completely parasitized and I dislike it…” Regarding the neural connections that are established and persist due to sexual abuse, Rita Levi-Montalcini (neurologist) commented. –Rita Levi-M: “Doctor, what you say is very important because these primary neural connections are precisely the ones that remain in place throughout a person's life, and it is the BEL and neuronal learning that manifests in their biobehavior. And these same neural connections can develop as sexual abuse persists, and then they will become associated with the experiences that accompany the sexual abuse itself.”

Are Abraham and Moses the ones who defend monotheism—the influence of an abstract, faceless deity—and consider themselves the chosen people when, above all, they promote the idea of a supernatural deity? –Moses: “I stand by what I said, that at that moment my BEG grasped the idea that this way I could get my people to unite and leave behind the disorder and the limitless, pleasant life; dissipated.” –Abraham: “I agree with Moses. Our BEG helped us unify our people and all have a common goal, that we all be examples to follow. But above all, as a people.” 

However, Moses, the people of Israel may have received this monotheistic idea from other peoples, but it is in their culture that the idea becomes essentialized, becomes part of their identity, and has remained so. “My opinion is yes, that's how it was. It came about spontaneously. You already told us, in the absence of any other explanation, that we arrived at that possibility or understanding. It's only when you know about the BEL universe that you can at least realize what the BEL essence of everything that exists, the BEL energy, really is, although you still can't explain it.”

At the BELC we held on May 9, 2010, it was opportune to also question the BEGs of those who biocollapsed in the so-called Inquisition, and their families. For this purpose, we summoned the BEG of the inquisitor Tomás de Torquemada, who described the so-called Inquisition as follows: “It was a period of humanity in which ‘characters’ like myself participated in its destruction, torturing them without reason and thus prohibiting others from freely expressing themselves… It is the period in which the NMEGO like mine expressed the sickest forms of self- and hetero-destruction. It is also the expression of my NMEGO, resentful and sickened by such absurd parasitization as justice, God, suffering, honesty, truth, and lies. In truth, I was an executioner who claimed to be satisfied by doing justice. That was what I learned in the wars and the mistreatment I received as a Spaniard.” We asked him if his NMEGO was also resentful of the sexual abuse, and, troubled by the question, he stated: “Yes, for the sexual abuse and other types of violence I was subjected to in the stupid wars and invasions. From which not even the NMEGO ever benefited.” We urged the BEG of Tomás de T to speak out regarding the BEGs of all the people who were punished, burned, mistreated, and branded as heretics, in a manner not only unjustifiable but also extremely brutal in that insatiable bloodlust for the witch hunt. “Now they can all bio-observe the lamentable state my BEG is in, a state I never knew I would find myself in. The dignity shown by all those I tortured was and is enviable. And to all these BEGs and their families, I apologize for my vile, sick, humiliating, and despicable behavior.” The BEGs of those who biocollapsed during the so-called Inquisition, and their families, spoke out about it at the time. “There is nothing better, doctor, than feeling liberated, and the fear we experienced, regarding the biocollapse, surprised us when we arrived at the BEL universe, feeling alive and without fear. And now that, with the BELCs, we have been helped to deparasite, we can feel calmer and live life or existence enjoying what we are learning. We are grateful to be heard; now we realize that the inquisitors are human BEGs who live overwhelmed, annihilating their existence. It is a burden that can help humanity realize that this stage has only transformed, but it still continues using other disguises and other forms of torture. These, however, can be rectified and modified by facing life with dignity and courage, by deparasiting.” Tomás de T, what do you want to say to the Jewish people, the Muslim peoples, and humanity? “Let them not continue to torment themselves with the lies and deceptions that religions of all kinds have created, have concocted, for the very destruction of humanity. Let them listen to their BEG and they will feel better.” Mary and Jesus, did you also influence the emergence and intensification of the so-called Inquisition and its inquisitors? “Yes, we also participated by influencing the inquisitors' NMEGOs through dreams and in the spread of the Inquisition throughout humanity.” Tomás de T, what can you say about what you heard? “Yes, indeed. Now I understand why they always dressed us like monks and made us carry a crucifix and banners of religious figures. And why we were required to proclaim our actions in the name of God. Furthermore, if we refused to continue as inquisitors, they sent us to flog us, to harm us, and threatened us with similar torture until we biocollapsed. Apparently, we had no escape, since everything was done according to the Church and for the sake of religious appearances.” At a BELC carried out in July 2014, we asked Mary, Joseph, and Jesus: Did you influence –and do you continue to influence– the invaders of the American continent to commit—and continue to commit—genocide, cannibalism, culturicide, and all kinds of atrocities against the original peoples of that continent and its natural resources? “In a way, yes, doctor, because we have already predisposed humanity to it. But if we hadn't participated in this way, humanity would have created other forms anyway. But we do recognize that we have been false and imprudent toward humanity.” Of course, Jesus and Mary also admitted to having instigated the Inquisition and the cruel sanctions and unjustified plundering that accompanied it. 

We invited other BEGs at the meeting to speak out about what they had heard. –Albert Einstein: “Everything seems clearer and more transparent. Finally, the pieces of the puzzle are coming together, completing the explanations needed as an argument for humanity.” –Dian Fossey (zoologist): “Religions have not only gone against humanity, but also against the unity of nature, using the same absurd… reasons. Just as science has covered up, with its own religion, the destruction of humanity and the unity of nature. Now everything is becoming clear to us, doctor Cuevas.” –Bertrand Russell (mathematician-philosopher): “The influence of Mary and Jesus is confirmed in the NMEGOs of the different inquisitors and murderers of humanity. Be it religious figures, scientists, historians, writers, researchers, and, ultimately, all of humanity, who in one way or another have been naively influenced. It is gratifying to be able to know now, through our BEG, with complete clarity the authentic BEL truth, the authentic participation that Mary and Jesus have had in humanity. A hug, doctor.” –Madame Curie: “It's very liberating for the BEG to know, in detail, the BEG of Mary, Jesus, and other guests. As part of humanity, my BEG also has the right to demand respect from them, and I do so. A hug, doctor.” –Abdus Salam: “The intensity with which each BEG has spoken out is not only of their own initiative; it's because their own BEL energy manifests itself when it is released.” –Multiple BEGs stated: “Now, doctor, we can indeed add that there are many parasitic words that have been mentioned, such as inquisition, heresy, rudeness, torture, witch hunt and heretic hunt...” –Ludwig Wittgenstein (mathematician philosopher): “In addition to the repertoire of parasitations in language that have been mentioned and those yet to be mentioned, it now turns out that the deception and trap in which humanity finds itself and has found itself, shown in stupid wars, invasions and other belligerent acts, these may also have an explanation for why humanity has sought to justify its behavior in other absurd ways, thus covering up this reality that is now presented to us.” –Konrad Lorenz (zoologist): “How fortunate that in other biospecies, such influence cannot be exerted, even if one attempts to do so. That's why the conceptualization of vectorization [a bifunctional approach between BEGs] in its different forms was important at this point.” –Bertrand Russell: "The contributions of my writings are being overtaken by the questioning being carried out on the BEGs of Mary, Jesus, and others. I was convinced that religion is false, but I didn't have the arguments that are now evident before the BELC." 

BELC of July 4, 2010. Ruth distinguished the BEGs from the Franciscans, the Poor Clares, John Bosco, and the Salesians, from multiple religious congregations, accompanied by many other minors, adolescents, young people and adults, men and women, from various parts of the world. –Francis of Assisi, on their behalf, commented: “Doctor, at this moment we cast aside the nonsense that Jesus, Mary, and Joseph led us to believe. And not because we haven't previously realized or acknowledged that they are BEL parasitizers, but because it's important that, once again and together, we unite to tell all those who have been deceived, parasitized, that we are totally against the three of them. And that we know that the only consequence of this determination is BEL liberation. Our BEG wouldn't allow us to miss this important and liberating moment for our existence and for everyone's. Many, many, many thanks, doctor. Because you have always been very respectful, and your intuitions have always been, in addition to being correct, liberating and guided by the BEL energy of the UU. Which has nothing to do with the gods.” 

From what they had bioheard, the invited BEGs confirmed the following. –Clare of Assisi: “Doctor, although we had already bioheard the way they parasitized in other BELCs, it is surprising that even the BEG himself/herself remains cold. He/she cannot be questioned for a moment. Their manipulations are very clear.” –John Bosco: “Doctor, I am impressed by your intuitions.” –Only in this way can we make some progress. –John Bosco: “Otherwise, one would continue to be deceived, doctor.” –The Salesians: “Doctor, it seems to us that the predominant parasitization is theirs, and they have left that legacy. That is why they have to deceive and remain that way.” –Joan of Arc: “Thank you very much, doctor. The tartuffes can only commit tartufferies, and when I recognize what they are, I recognize what influence, what parasitization, they have had.” –John Paul II (Pope): “It is regrettable, doctor, that credibility continues [5].”

BELC of August 30, 2014. In this same BELC, I asked the BEGs of Adam, Eve, Cain, Abel, Abraham, Ishmael, Isaac, Sarah, Hagar, Noah and family, Moses, Joshua, David, and Solomon, all biblical figures, if they knew how to read and write, and in general, they acknowledged that they could neither read nor write. To the question of whether the Hebrew people were and are God's chosen people, Eve, Abraham, Noah, Moses, and Joshua simply answered: "No, doctor." Adam gave us an inkling of his answer with: "No... by no means," and David and Solomon affirmed: "No, it is not." Moses reaffirmed that there was no Tablet of the Law. Joshua acknowledged that there was no such land promised by God either. David confirmed what he had already hinted at, that the encounter with Goliath (1 Samuel 17:1-58) did not occur and that "it was only a copy of a fantasy." In contrast, Solomon differed with them on some of their answers. Solomon, did you know how to read and write? “Yes, a little, doctor.” Did you write Ecclesiastes? “Yes, with help I was able to finish it.” Did you write the Song of Songs? “Also, doctor.” From ideas solely yours? “Nor, doctor.” Where did they come from? “From other texts.” From what origin? “Very diverse origins, doctor.” Evasive… Why? Did he really write both texts? 

At the BELC on August 30, 2014, we invited Muhammad's BEG to comment on the origin of the Quran. He succinctly replied that the Quran resulted: "From the inventiveness... of several people who were interested in taking a leading role, primarily me, but others wrote and corrected the writings. Let's say I dictated and they wrote and corrected." Based on the existing texts of the Bible, in its Old and New Testament sections, and that we only "gave it the variation and forcefulness we thought necessary." Always according to the needs of the Arab peoples. What effect has the Quran had on the Arab peoples, and on other peoples who have adhered to it? "Devastating, it has had a devastating effect, unfortunately." Currently, Palestinians and Jews have been bombing each other. "Yes, doctor, the desire to exterminate and dominate has increased."

Biodialogues from July 25, August 8, 15, 22, and 30, and September 5 and 12, 2014, and additional information from other bioexperiences. We invited Thomas (apostle), Peter (apostle), Paul (apostle), Judas (apostle), Magdalene (disciple), Joseph, Mary, and Jesus to ask the men if they had been circumcised, a distinctive practice of the Jewish population. 

1) Jesus, hesitant at the unexpected question, replied: “No… No, doctor, I was not circumcised… No one has ever spoken of that before.” He accepted that this bioinformation would be confirmatory: “That I am neither a Jew nor who I made humanity believe I was.” He accepted that omitting this information from his writings was “a sign of deception.” When asked if Jesus was circumcised, Thomas stated: “Obviously not, doctor.” The rest of those close to Jesus confirmed that he was not circumcised. Thomas always claimed to be of Jewish origin, however, when we asked him about this issue, he acknowledged that he was not circumcised either. “It's a story,” he recounted, “that my parents hid because I was about to biocollapse at birth, and they hid me so they wouldn't sacrifice me. However, my parents left me a mark… A wound on my foreskin so they could identify that I had indeed undergone the rite or ceremony, but it wasn't actually circumcision, and so they wouldn't sacrifice me.” Thomas explained that boys who were born with a malformation of the penis were “sacrificed”. Regarding girls with any malformation, he said they were “sacrificed” too: “In cases where, for them [the parents and the community], they had some malformation in any part of the body, because they too were going to perpetuate the biospecies or the population. In some cases, they didn't know what to do, but in other cases, they simply let them live, despite all their suffering.” Also, Thomas made us intuit that his penis and, especially, his testicles “were very small,” his arms were long and thin, the cartilage of his larynx was small, his voice was always high-pitched, although he tried to make it sound deep, he had little facial, axillary and pubic hair, his bust was a little enlarged and his ejaculation was scarce, and that over the years it decreased even more. All of these signs and symptoms suggest some type of chromosomal abnormality [47, XXY?]. To avoid "sacrifice," his parents refused to take him to a doctor and treated him "with herbs," he noted. Because of this problem, he was rejected by his parents and relatives, which caused him to wander from childhood, running away in fear without knowing why. And until now, the reason for this fear was explained. He added that "sacrifices" were practiced by all communities "because malformations were considered a curse, a punishment, or simply bad luck, and the child would have to be discarded," he indicated. Finally, he commented: "Yes, doctor, the joy of the BEL universe helps, and the explanation you gave me even more. I am very grateful for your words." Thomas added that his real name was “Jericho.” Peter confirmed what Thomas had communicated.

Biodialogue of September 5, 2014 we invited the BEGs of Esther, Zuley (first) and Azaé (third), daughters of Mary, and also the BEGs of Clara and Francis of Assisi, John Bosco and the Salesians, Joan of Arc and John Paul II, Celina, Lucía and Raúl (former collaborators). About herself, Esther noted: “I don't like to comment, doctor, I like to listen and intuit... But it makes me feel very good to intuit [make us intuit, speak bioenergetically] and it increases my dignity. It's a very pleasant feeling... I didn't start a family. I dedicated myself solely to helping people. I lived in a dispensary. I wasn't a nurse, but I was an assistant. I just liked to help, and there I could intuit and listen. I wasn't obligated to speak, or ask, or listen; it was just a matter of caring and occasionally resting. Sometimes resources were needed, and I would go work with the apothecaries and healers so they could give us solutions [substances].” According to Esther, Mary's behavior as a mother: “She was indignant because she behaved indifferently and sometimes violently.” Esther didn't know who her father was, and she angrily denounced her brother Jesus, saying: "Jesutufe was the one the BEL investigation uncovered, a con-artist Tartuffe. Very foolish and perhaps slower than my brother Judas-Ismael. However, he was more protected by Maritufe, and that's why I see him as useless." And that Joseph had been: "Another Tartuffe who wanted to benefit in some way and, pretending to be different, ended up being just as much of a Tartuffe." She emphasized that the source of her brother Jesus's uncontrollable resentment stems from: "He endured so much abuse, yet he couldn't act differently." For Esther, Mary, Joseph, Jesus, and their accomplices: "They acted by stealing because they couldn't do anything different. And all kidnapping has a consequence, which is continuing to live in frustration, doing the same thing, which later became parasitic." Esther mentioned that Peter and Paul weren't actually kidnapped by the gang as they insisted: "No, doctor, they probably arrived because they heard about the gang from someone and they started arriving that way. That's my version, doctor." With which Peter and Paul agreed with her… Regarding the way in which the writings called the Gospels were prepared, she commented: “I could tell you that they didn't create them; they probably stole them too. Someone made that appear to be a very fictitious story for humanity. That is, someone compiled all that information, and it was simply stolen. And they were writings of which there was only one. That would be my version, doctor. They didn't tell me; I only intuit and hear. That's as far as I can go. Maybe they added a few more texts, but it seems to me that it was probably stolen.” Mary, Solomon, Joseph, Jesus, Peter, Paul, Judas and Thomas bowed their heads, all nodded and acknowledged: “Yes, doctor, that’s how it was… It wasn’t intentional, but by carelessness [unexpected]… They came inside the things we stole… from a family surely but we don’t know who.” If Esther had given another version, the Jesus, Mary, Jospeh and their clique would have also agreed, remember that the only thing that interests them is being paid attention to… Regarding the content of the writings, Esther pointed out that: “They seem very superficial to me, doctor, because they are only intended to seduce the NMEGO. That is their style. I didn’t know much about those writings, only from hearsay, but they seemed contradictory, false.” Esther acknowledged that she knew little about reading and writing, and that only: “I knew my letters, but I wrote very little. I also read because it was necessary in the dispensary. For me, it was the basics [6].”

Extra biodialogue from September 10, 2010. The BEL effects of reading the deification biosyndrome still linger. David Ben-Gurion, the BEG, joined us. David B, would you like to comment on what you heard in this and, perhaps, other BELCs? “I'm baffled, doctor, because I find it very enlightening how BEGs can intuit their own lives and now express their feelings, their opinions, and leave explanations that are in line with what they experienced. Also, I realize how biovectorization has favored your intuition, doctor, about the deification biosyndrome. For trying to explain the existence of the UU hasn't been easy for humans, but it has been very simple for the BEL energy to express it.” What do you want to say to the Israeli people? “They may doubt what I am about to express next, however, it is important that my BEG feel useful and reassured in doing so. It seems to me that the Israeli people, like everyone else, have been deceived into assuming that there are chosen ones or favorites, when in reality it has only been the after-effects of sexual abuse, drug use, and the deification biosyndrome that have caused humanity to become disoriented and threaten its own existence and that of the rest of the biospecies. Without the slightest questioning of what has already been done. Persisting in this foolishness has been a mistake and will continue to be so.” Do you want to add anything else? “Yes, perhaps the Israeli people assume that if they stop thinking about their own beliefs it will bring very regrettable consequences. But that is not the case; they would only show a demonstration of intelligence, intuition, and BEL development. They could occupy themselves with other matters and continue supervising their interests [7].”

BELC, November 9, 2014. Judas, give us your version of how the Gospels originated: “I only biorremember a production of sheets, which circulated at the time and were only brief passages of well-known stories.” From different sources, places, and authors. “Yes, doctor, from different sources, places, which were expanded as they became known and people gave their opinions, and what people added was later written down.” So, it was a progressive and collective development? “Yes, doctor, some events were modified to make them more original. But in other cases, like the dreams, they were so exceptional that they remained that way, and some of them were even written down as real events.” Whose dreams, were they? “People's, doctor.” Was it like that, Mary? The bioimage of Mary was standing and sort of vanished. “Yes, doctor, that's how it was.” Was it like that, Jesus? “Yes, doctor, that's how it was.” Judas, who was Mark? “I can’t quite place it because those names were also invented.” Was it by you or possibly by the ancient Church or the Vatican itself? “It was later because that’s how the writings were created and surely when making different versions, and rather they placed them as different versions so they would make sense” [sic]. Was that later work? “Yes, doctor.” Who was Matthew? –Judas: … –Ruth: The BEG of Matthew is present, but his name is not intuited in the writings. –Did you write anything, Matthew? “No, doctor.” What relationship did you have with Mary and Jesus? “We were just neighbors.” What do Mary and Jesus add to what Judas and Matthew have clarified? –Mary: “Well, it’s true, doctor.” –Jesus: “That’s true, doctor.” 

BELC of January 10, 2017, –BEGs of writers, anthropologists, historians, journalists, and others: “Doctor, it's interesting how the biblical writings had to accumulate because they were surely very simple at first. And then they were elaborated and perhaps corrected at some point.” Their comment coincides with what Judas stated [8].

Bioexperience of September 21, 2014. –Esther: “Doctor, I completely agree with the questioning. That is the behavior of Mary and Jesus. They disdain the goodness of all kinds of values.” –Zuley: “Yes, doctor, I am also very pleased to have heard this questioning, and indeed it is very relevant to be able to truly reveal who Mary and Jesus are.” –Azaé: “I also agree, doctor, the attitude of Mary and Jesus is precisely that of feeling ‘invincible and fearsome’ in all its variations.” –Clare of Assisi: “Doctor, dreams are a revelation in this regard.” Evasive… –Francis of Assisi, if you would be so kind, make a non-evasive comment. Remember that you were infatuated with this character for many years. –Francis of Assisi: “Yes, doctor, I am surprised and at the same time satisfied because you have made them question the way in which they have parasitized and dedicated their entire existence to destructiveness and to fully satisfying and mocking us, amusing themselves at our expense. It is totally outrageous that they still accept it cynically and without any manifestation of self-criticism.” –This comment sounds more like it comes from Jesus… –Joan of Arc: “Doctor, I am an example of how I was influenced and how they guided my steps toward war, and at this moment I demand an apology from Mary and Jesus to all of us who have been the object of their mockery and their outrageous need for pleasure. By what right do they take this responsibility? By what right have they parasitized and supplanted those they have considered puppets of their satisfaction. Their actions are repugnant, and I apologize to all those who, by letting myself be carried away by my own NMEGO to be the protagonist of something that now makes me ashamed to say. That by proclaiming a war, I could defend a cause.” –Mary and Jesus, what do you want to say to Joan of Arc and her confraternities? –Mary and Jesus: “Yes, doctor, an apology for having used them for purposes that are now unacceptable.” –Inés de Asbaje bewildered: “Yes, doctor, thank you. This questioning, doctor, helps us above all to find our bearings, because the reproach we only made to ourselves, we now understand that perhaps we don’t have, at least I don’t have [like Joan of Arc], the courage to express myself, [or stop] continuing to reproach myself for not having been able to realize and have been different. But the way Mary and Jesus behave toward all of humanity and bioenergemity is detestable. The only way we could feel better is for the true story of Mary and Jesus to be known. That we too have influenced and, in turn, participated, and to accept not only our behavior as humans, but also the difficulty in detaching ourselves from rubbish thoughts and junk knowledge.” –John Bosco: “Doctor, what we just witnessed at this BELC has been the fundamental part of the questioning of the Tartuffes. And of the tartuffes, promoters of human tartuffery, who have indeed long sought to biocollapse the planet so they can become part of another history, so that this existence is forgotten, and above all, so they themselves can be in a different existential situation. However, once discovered, it will be difficult for them, even if forgotten, to have any moment of rest or peace. Ultimately, doctor, they wanted to be published, to achieve the notoriety that characterizes them, and they have said so now, using any means, and that is how they have always acted: usurping others.” –John XXIII (Pope): “Doctor, I think this questioning is very healthy for the bioenergemity, and it leaves us with a very pleasant taste. While it's true that other BELCs have commented on this, this time the multiple ways in which they have parasitized and their purposes are clear, and that we have all ultimately been influenced at some point. It seems to me, doctor, that the purpose of questioning is fulfilled from the moment bioenergemity remains as a witness to it. And what they can say, how they justify themselves, is really not as important as the effect this questioning and this revelation leave on the UU, which they intended to appropriate and have ultimately settled on only one planet. Of that planet, it is a tiny fraction of their influence. In reality, they are not as powerful as they would like to be, while we continue to enjoy BEL research and its own effects. There's no comparison.” –John Paul II: “Yes, doctor, indeed, what we just heard is a long-awaited questioning meant to put everyone in their place. In the BEL universe, doctor, there is a tranquility and a joy where hope, a sense of credibility, and trust are once again restored. Regardless of whether these cynical Tartuffes do or influence what they want, they will remain austere. The rest of us can continue with our contented existence thanks to this questioning. This doesn't absolve us of responsibility, but it does explain and clarify the participation we can have in a fair way. Indeed, doctor, the truth has already been sown, and its fruits will be reaped. The BEL investigation fulfills its function. A function that is for everyone and for the benefit of all. All that remains is to applaud and celebrate it.” –Cuauhtlatoatzin (tlahtoani), the one who speaks like an eagle, or ‘Juan Diego’: “Doctor, I congratulate you and value your intuitions. Questioning itself is important to me not because of the individuals you question, but because of the effects it has on bioenergemity. And this, in turn, will influence all of humanity. It's also part of the changing era. Necessary for the BEG, and it will build a different future. Surely there will be leaders with other concerns, hence the feeling that some feel affected and limited to their minimal expression. The UU and BEL research have already revealed this to us, and we are therefore very satisfied that, above all, justice, truth, and honesty are manifesting. The grass grows green, doctor. The flowers manifest their freedom, and their fruits are savored with more intensity. Thank you for the truth.” –Lucy Jiménez (Nahuatl teacher): “I thank you, doctor, and we went from a moment where the atmosphere was cloudy. We saw that they are only clouds that are there as part of a process, but in the company of the wind, the atmosphere is revealed to be a color of clarity and transparency. BEL research, doctor, has provided us with this, this reality, and it was very important for humanity to get to know each other and assume our participation, a co-participatory reality to stop allowing ourselves to be influenced and to understand the origin of our decisions and our influences. A hug, and bioenergemity applauds you.” –Celina: “Doctor, I am surprised and I have no choice but to accept that this is the truth and from which we run away. We all run away to avoid facing the fact that we are being manipulated and unfortunately influenced to the detriment of others. This is the moment to be able to rectify it, thanks to BEL research.” –Lucía: “Doctor, difficult BELC, but essential, necessary to enrich our BEG. These are the bioexperiences that the BEG needs to nourish itself, to continue being BEG, independent and healthy.” –Raúl: Doctor, how parasitic! A more specific questioning was fair and necessary, and indeed, it seems the situation didn't please them, those questioned, but they were the least important. Bioenergemity is strengthened, and that's what matters.”

Crucifixion or the Fiction of the Cross. Octavio Paz, Jorge Luis Borges, Alfonso Reyes, and many other writers: “Doctor, the phrase ‘crucifixion’ is very clear and very interesting. We who read it never realized that…” A pun, commutation? “Yes, an implicit commutation. It immediately made us understand what is described there in that text. That concludes, in a word, all the events described there.” 

BELC August 22, 2014. John Paul II, do you want to add anything else? “No, doctor…” And shortly after, he added: “One day the truth will be known, and the Church has finally deceived humanity. All religions are the same. All religious people are the same: they are merchants.”

BELC extra from December 25, 2015. BEG of Mateo, did you know if your neighbor Jesus was punished by being tied hand and foot to a heavy wooden cross, which, as part of the punishment, he had to carry during a journey, exposing him to the scorn of the people until he arrived at the place where he would remain punished? “I don't know how to place it, doctor. Sometimes, since they weren't there, I got the impression they fled and were away from home for some time.” BEGs of the contemporary inhabitants of Mary, Joseph, and Jesus, did you hear that Jesus was punished on a cross before traveling through the town, carrying and dragging this piece of wood? "Well, no, doctor, not in this town or any nearby towns. There would have been after-effects on his body, and there weren't any." Mary, approximately how old was Jesus when you caused your father to biocollapse? “Doctor, I don’t remember well, but he was probably in his twenties.” Mary’s father, did you hear that Jesus was punished on a cross after carrying it while being mocked by the townspeople? “No, doctor, I wasn’t aware of any such events.” Pontius Pilate, was Jesus ever arrested? “No, doctor.” Mary, Joseph, and Jesus. 1. There was no Last Supper. 2. There was no crown of thorns for Jesus, 3. There was no injury to his chest. 4. He was not nailed in the hands or feet. 5. There was no Stations of the Cross. 6. Jesus biocollapsed after turning seventy years old. 7. Based on the information you’ve provided, it’s reasonable to doubt whether there was punishment on the cross and a previous journey carrying it or not, okay? “Okay, doctor.” Therefore, the Crucifixion actually refers to the cross and fiction, the fiction of the cross. Shall we agree on that? "Yes, doctor, that's what we agree it is." Mary, Jesus, Joseph, Magdalene, Peter, Paul, Judas, Thomas, what can you say to the above? Ruth comments that Mary, theatrically, kneels, covers her face with her hands, weeps, and confirms. –Mary: It's true, doctor, it's true. –Jesus: “Doctor, your intuition is correct, and I accept that it's the truth.” And what can you say about what you affirm? “Doctor, what we have said regarding what we have invented is true.” Are you impressed, Jesus? “That's right, doctor.” How do you feel? What impresses you? “I am overwhelmed and impressed by the way you study bioinformation and arrive at new intuitions that are undoubtedly true.” It's the other way around, Jesus. First, the intuitions are given—deciphering the word crucifixion—and then I organize how to bioinvestigate those intuitions to find some basis for them and invite the appropriate BEGs. Just like today. What can you say? “Yes, doctor, that’s right, excuse me.” –Joseph: Well, doctor, all I have to say is that what you intuited is true. –Magdalene: “Yes, doctor, that’s how it happened.” What? “That’s how we act and invent.” –Peter: “Doctor, it’s quite true that there are situations that can be hidden, but they can’t remain hidden indefinitely.” –Paul: I'm glad, doctor, that we've gotten to the real, the truth, the true intention. –Judas: Doctor, it's interesting how, in the face of evidence and one's own words, the truth cannot be refuted. –Thomas: Doctor, all I can say is that your words are true. –BELC 08/02/2016. Dimas and Gestas didn't exist, and the BEGs of the thieves who were accused at that time didn't know that Jesus had been crucified. 

What can you say of what you've heard? –John Paul I (Pope): Doctor, it's a shame that circumstances lead us to reality, to the painful and disappointing reality. –John XXIII: It's regrettable to have created a story full of falsehood, assuming nothing was going to happen. We can't consider the NMEGO to be true to itself. –John Paul II: Doctor, it's an example of the lamentable and fictitious faith of the Church, of the sects [9].

Extra bioexperience from August 28, 2010. Note that the invited BEGs, and as we have already noted, especially the religious figures, are accepting certain facts or contributing experiences with greater precision or detail as they have gained confidence and intuited that other BEGs recognize or agree to engage in biodialogue about sensitive or difficult aspects that occurred during their BML existence. This is the case, for example, of Moses, who, with some discomfort, but always courteous, gave us intuit into some aspects of his childhood and other data. Did the ten plagues of Egypt occur, Moses? "No, doctor, the ten plagues mentioned as having occurred in Egypt refer to events that, for human NMEGO, were merely an everyday problem that was exaggerated by the difficulty of finding an adequate solution. That is, by dysfunctional ignorance." Was there such an exodus of the Jews, led by you, to leave Egypt? "Not as such, doctor, it was just a constant search for food and better living conditions. In reality, we were a small group who considered ourselves a family and had the sick idea of deifying ourselves.” Did the Jews migrate through the desert, guided by you, for forty years? “Your intuition is correct, doctor, it wasn’t like that. In reality, the time mentioned is too long, and we wouldn’t have been able to survive.” Was the legend that you managed to part the waters of the Red Sea (Exodus 14:21-31) so that your people could pass through without being reached by the Egyptian armies, real? “No, doctor, it wasn’t real.” Was there really such a land promised by God for the Jewish people? “No, doctor, it was just an invention, an idea, another fantasy directed by the NMEGO. Obviously, we were looking for a place where there would be food and protection, but it’s what any family would look for to stay alive.” Is the legend that you were abandoned in a reed basket floating on the banks of the Nile River (Exodus 2:3) and found by a pharaoh’s daughter true? "No, doctor, that legend isn't true; it's also a fantasy of the NMEGO. Even back then, being an illegitimate child was considered an offense. However, it was also very common, and at the same time, there was a desire to be welcomed into a comfortable and favorable situation for the NMEGO." Moses, saddened, acknowledged that he was sexually abused between the ages of eight and ten: "It was a practice as common as being an illegitimate child." His stepfather was the abuser; his mother didn't know, and Moses, at the time of the BELC, sensed that when she found out, she made him leave. What did your mother do? "My mother worked since she was a child and used to help people, going to homes to offer her services in any way she could." Do you have anything else to add? "Yes, thank you, doctor, for clarifying these passages." We gladly told him, very kindly for your trust, and he added: "Now this allows me to understand the meaningful search for a father and belonging to a people with a legitimate name. That is, to be accepted and recognized by others. It doesn't matter whether the father belongs to that social group or not; the important thing is that the mother accepts it, as is the case among the Jewish people." It seems that the real or apparent illegitimacy of its members is an ancestral problem of the Israeli people. “Your comment is very important, doctor. It seems to me that this is how the absurd heritage of the Israeli people is becoming more consistent. Circumcision, as an apparently protective measure, is a way of hiding the sexual abuse that is intended to be eradicated, having been a common practice. Once circumcised, the child could no longer be sexually abused, but in reality, this practice was intended to hide that fact, the sexual abuse that was common for a time.” Trying to hide the uncomfortable social wound of illegitimacy, the only thing that seems to have been achieved is to make it increasingly evident. “Of course, doctor, it is an ancestral wound that the NMEGO was defeated by, unable to find a better way to deal with. It seems to me that the way the mother, the one primarily affected, feels wounded has been fundamental to this. And a chain continues, becoming a network in which an entire people is trapped; that is the NMEGO. Illegitimacy has been a plague.”

Ishmael (Abraham's son) admitted that between the ages of six and eight: “Yes, doctor, my BEG makes me suspect that I was sexually abused by a priest [sic], excuse me for getting ahead of myself [sic]… When I told my mother what was happening, I only asked her not to take me back [sic]. And she did, although she stopped speaking to me for a while.” He added: “Yes, doctor, it seems to me that the deification biosyndrome implicitly involves sexually abusing others in every possible way. It is an attack on autonomy, on individuality, on the BEG itself. It is part of the age-old sense of guilt that we have inherited. I am very grateful for these moments of reflection for the BEG; and they are also very important for the bioenergemity.” Later, we will return to the sensitive topic of possible sexual abuse suffered by some biblical figures.

Addressing Hagar's BEG, Ishmael's mother, we commented. So, female infibulation has also been and is a way of trying to exclude or hide the sexual abuse committed against Arab women—and women from other latitudes—from childhood. “What you explain is very liberating, doctor. Indeed, this is an attempt to cover up the sexual abuse that a woman experiences from childhood. Just as the garment that completely covers our body, doctor, has the same function.” With Sarah's BEG, Isaac's mother, the biodialogue continued. How does a Jewish mother experience the circumcision performed on her sons? “Truly, doctor, the circumcision performed on our sons is experienced as a source of pain and rejection of the practice itself. However, we are also raised to accept this atrocity with pride, for it is a symbol of apparent distinction.” Hesitantly, Isaac's Beg emphasized that for the Jewish father, circumcision performed on his sons is experienced: "As an assault on dignity. It is a predisposition to separation [sic] in a cruel manner and not as a natural process, as it is a ritual." Ishmael and Isaac are reluctant to comment on what they are, however, insinuating. 

We asked Ibn Battuta's BEG; how does an Arab father experience the practice of infibulation on his daughters? "It's a very important question because, of course, it's very painful for a father to see his daughter suffer. It's as offensive to the daughter as it is equally painful for the father. Yet, this is how the contempt for women among Arab nations is justified and manifested." We invited BEGs of Arab and African women from ancient and recent times. What do you intuit about the fact that you and your daughters and sons have been subjected to infibulation? "Doctor, thank you for taking care of us. We believe that no human being, man or woman, deserves such abuse. Especially in the genital area and for very absurd ideas. We always tolerate pain and accept very violent and abusive ideas toward us and our sons and daughters." Based on what you now understand, what are they trying to hide from children with this practice? "Well, the sexual abuse that girls and boys are subjected to. And the rubbish thoughts and junk knowledge that humans have." [These two questions are from the BELC 11/09/2014].

We turn to Joshua's BEG. Did the waters of the Jordan River part (Joshua 3:1-17) so that the Jewish people could cross it in pursuit of the supposed promised land? "No, doctor, it's a metaphorical way of expressing the fantasy of fleeing and finding an oasis..." In the desert of existence... Joshua tried to figure out how to complete his sentence and, as we supported him, added: "Exactly, doctor, in the desert of existence... It's easy to biocommunicate with you, doctor."

–Sigmund Freud: “Doctor, the waters finally parted, and what was already written became clear, becoming a legitimate part of a lie that is now explained as a reality that is part of the deification biosyndrome.” –Being a legitimate part of an illegitimacy… Hastily, he clarified: –Indeed, doctor… Doctor, clarity is not in the water, but in discovering what is hidden in the depths” –Intuitive depth of the BEG and, rather, intuitive clarification of the BEG… Obviously uneasy, he added: –Yes, I agree, doctor. Congratulations, doctor, a hug. –Was it uncomfortable for you that we questioned the patriarchs and prophets? –Yes, doctor. –Was it uncomfortable because you're Jewish and/or because you may have also been sexually abused as a child? –For both reasons, doctor. –Were you sexually abused as a child? –Yes, doctor. –Who sexually abused you? –My father. I was three or four years old until I was nine. –What stopped the sexual abuse? –I myself refused. I had to threaten the family, my parents, because they denied it. –Did your half-siblings also sexually abuse you, or not? –Yes, one, the eldest, also sexually abused me. –In collusion with your father? –Certainly, Doctor. –Did this history of sexual abuse you experienced sometimes influence the way you made your comments? –With all due respect, doctor, it has always seemed to me that you have explained the situations in the BEL investigation very well, and if my comment seemed different, I apologize. I think the explanation you shared with us about sexual abuse, about the biosyndrome of the abused, was very important to me. That's why I remained silent. –How did the sexual abuse you suffered influence your writing and your approach to professional practice? –It was decisive; in my essays, I always kept my experience in mind. That's why, in sessions with patients, I turned my back on them. –You didn't write, but you did write about the sexual abuse you experienced. Your writings are like an autobiography of the NMEGO. –Indeed, that's how I understand it now, doctor. –The history of sexual abuse you suffered would explain, at least in part, why you fainted when questioned with some insistence and annoyance. Was that the case? –That's right, doctor. –Did you sexually abuse minors, adolescents, or adults, men or women? –Yes, doctor, I sexually abused men and women, adolescents, young people, and adults. –Did you sexually abuse girls or boys? –No, doctor. –Then he denies it... What can you say of the seemingly uncontrollable tendency of some of your colleagues to oppose your writings? –It's possible that some of them have a history of sexual abuse. –Do you want to add anything else? –I thank you, doctor, for freeing me. I apologize again, and I also appreciate you sharing your intuitions with everyone. –You have nothing to apologize for. I agree that you were sincere, as you've now demonstrated. A warm hug to you. 

Other BEGs gave us intuition into their comments. –Ludwig W: Names are parasitized, doctor; they are also part of the legend. As Abdus Salam mentions, it is through the name that they acquire a history, and their origin can no longer be questioned, as it has also been pointed out by the deification biosyndrome. –Madame Curie and Louis Pasteur: However, what is done or accomplished during the BML existence is also important, and this is how individuality and autonomy of BEL are identified. This is how we now consider ourselves BEL researchers. 

As we said our goodbyes, everyone was very cheerful and biovectored according to their affinities… My BEG added: “It was necessary to explain the background in order to clarify what we concluded at today's BELC. Illegitimacy has resulted in preferring to be an illegitimate child rather than having been sexually abused by the father, the mother, or others. Illegitimacy can at least be mentioned, but sexual abuse cannot be mentioned at all. Hence, illegitimacy often conceals sexual abuse.”

Extra biodialogue from September 10, 2010. We address Abraham's BEG. Did you sexually abuse one or both of your children during their childhood? Abraham: "That's a very difficult question to answer, doctor." Last time, your children, trying to avoid the issue, hinted at it, Abraham. "But, indeed, that's how it was, I sexually abused my children... They were six or seven years old; it happened for a year." What quarrel were you having with Isaac, your son, that you intended to sacrifice him? "Thank you, doctor, for the question. Indeed, he seemed to me to be a very intuitive man." My BEG corrected him: A very intuitive child. "That's right, doctor, a very intuitive child." Were you trying to hide something by sacrificing your son Isaac? "Indeed, doctor, your intuition is correct, I was trying to hide the sexual abuse I committed against him." What stopped you? “The child himself told me to do it, to sacrifice him, and that's when I reacted. He told me that would make me feel better. I felt exposed, just like now.” Abraham accepted that, in turn, as a child of six or seven years old, he was sexually abused by his father, and that thanks to his mother's intervention, the abuse ended. Do you want to add anything else? "Yes, doctor, the patriarchs and prophets are also part of the deification biosyndrome because, as BEL research has shown, intuition does not belong to an age, a gender, a sect, or an ethnic group, but is part of life itself." Abraham hugged Isaac and Ishmael and concluded: "Thank you, doctor." ... As background, a neighbor sexually abused Abraham's father when he was four or five years old [BELC 26/04/2015]. ... Isaac's BEG acknowledged that Abraham, his father, sexually abused him as a child, from approximately six to eight years old. The abuse stopped because: “The guilt my father felt for doing it, and possibly because I wouldn’t let him, made me run away and scream.” He denied sexually abusing men or women of any age because: “Sexual abuse can be a wound that heals over time, but the guilt of sexually abusing others is the remorse that can remain deep and constant throughout life.” Ishmael's BEG also accepted that Abraham, his father, sexually abused him as a child, a similar age to Isaac. Because of his attitude and that of Hagar, his mother, the abuse stopped, despite the fact that "as a child I was very..., I really sought my father's acceptance and I submitted to him." Ishmael asserted that he was three years older than Isaac. He denied having sexually abused women or men of any age, although he acknowledged that "I was ambivalent, contemptuous, and appeared cordial to others." This attitude, during the BELC, he understood, was a consequence of the sexual abuse he suffered in childhood. Isaac acknowledged having been treated as an illegitimate son, without explaining why he was treated this way. Ishmael also admitted that he had been seen as an illegitimate son, because of "my mother's NMEGO." Sarah admitted having deceived Abraham, her husband, for which he treated Isaac as an illegitimate son, but that Abraham was in fact the father of Isaac. Hagar claimed she hadn't deceived Abraham and that Ishmael was indeed Abraham's son, but Abraham doubted that Ishmael was his son because he assumed Hagar was also deceiving him. Abraham commented: "My NMEGO once thought I was the stepfather of Isaac and Ishmael. But now my BEG says I am the father of both of them."

Adam's BEG admitted to having sexually abused "only" one of his daughters as a child; however, Eve immediately challenged him and clarified: "No. He did abuse one of his children because he assumed the child wasn't his, and he also wanted to know what it felt like." We invited BEGs who had been sexually abused by Adam, and men and women, adults, young people, adolescents, and boys and girls came forward. Adam sexually abused his daughter from the age of ten to twelve or thirteen, and Eve was the one who stopped the abuse. Adam, on the other hand, attributed alcohol consumption to his assumption that his child wasn't his. The child would have been about eight years old, and it was Eve who also stopped this abuse. In contrast, Eve denied having committed any sexual abuse, either against her daughters or sons or against anyone else. Sexual abuse and concealment are undoubtedly commonplace in human history. Eve: “I don't deny that I played a part in Adam's behavior, since we both drank alcohol, although I didn't act in the same way. And now I realize that Adam had difficulties with his sexual identity, and now I'm beginning to understand it through the BELCs. That also makes me part of the complications that were being experienced at that time. That's how I understand it, doctor.” –What can you say about the way in which drinking alcohol has influenced sexually abusive behavior, and other types of abuse, throughout human history? –Eve and Adam: Indeed, doctor, because drinking alcohol obstructs the critical judgment of the NMEGO and blocks the ability to intuit the BEG's messages. It has been an atrocity that religions also promote it, permit it as part of their rituals, or prohibit it as a punishment, making alcohol part of that original sin or as part of a diversion. –Adam's BEG admitted that he was sexually abused: “My grandfather sexually abused me when I was about six years old. The sexual abuse continued until I was twelve. It was sporadic, but it happened.” It is not explained what stopped the abuse “it just stopped happening, possibly they found someone else or the culprit, possibly, that's what I suspect.” However, the following participated in this sexual harassment: “My father, my grandfather, an uncle who was my father's brother. It seemed like a family tradition.” Once again, and in stark contrast, Eva claimed not to have suffered sexual abuse in childhood because “I began my sexual life at an early age, but I didn't experience it as sexual abuse.” Their sexual activity began when: “I was probably thirteen years old, compared to adolescent boys of a similar age to me. Perhaps that’s why Adam doubted that Cain was his son,” she insisted, thus inducing us to address the issue of his son Cain, whom Adam, not considering his son, treated angrily. –What drove Cain to biocollapse Abel, his brother? –Eve: Possibly, doctor, the anger he learned from Adam’s treatment of him. –What did Adam expect from your sexual condition? –Eve: Now I intuit, doctor, that Adam would have wanted me to be a virgin. However, sexual relations were carried out without reflection; they were only carried out because that’s how it was supposed to be. 

Cain's BEG admitted to having sexually abused Abel, his brother, "at that moment I couldn't stand to see him, it reminded me that I would have sexually abused him, my brother Abel." And to get to biocollapse his brother influenced: "My father's preference. In reality, that wasn't what happened, but I assumed it was." However, with renewed vigor, he advanced, asserting that: "I felt a lot of anger about the sexual abuse I suffered from Adam, and not sexually abusing Abel." Adam sexually harassed Cain: "From the age of eight, I would say there were three occasions at that age. But they were very grotesque, with the appearance of play." He tried to point out that Adam's sexual abuse was very aggressive for Cain and that it only stopped thanks to Eve's intervention. Finally, Cain reconciled, adding: “Finally, Abel and I have been BEL fellow since you helped us in another BELC [on May 23, 2008] and we are grateful.” … Abel’s BEG gave us the intuition that he biocollapsed “when he was about thirty years old.” He ratified the problem of his parents’ alleged preference for him, which led Cain to beat him, smashing his head against rocks until he lost consciousness and biocollapsed [BELC 11/09/2014] … He denied having sexually abused anyone and, smiling, boasted that "there was no sexual abuse on my part. The women approached me, I suppose genuinely.”

David Ben-Gurion's BEG joined us. Would you like to comment on what you've heard in this and, perhaps, other BELCs? "I'm puzzled, doctor, because I find it very enlightening how BEGs can intuit their own lives and now express their feelings, their opinions, and leave explanations that are in line with what they experienced. I also realize how biovectorization has favored your intuition, doctor, about the deification biosyndrome. Trying to explain the existence of the UU hasn't been easy for humans, but it has been very simple for the BEL energy to express it." What do you want to say to the Israeli people? “You may doubt what I am about to say next, however, it is important that my BEG feels useful and at ease in doing so. It seems to me that the Israeli people, like everyone else, have been deceived into assuming that there are chosen ones or favorites, when in reality it has only been the after-effects of sexual abuse, drug abuse, and deification biosyndrome that have caused humanity to become disoriented and threaten its own existence and that of the rest of the biospecies. Without the slightest questioning of what has already been done. Persisting in this foolishness has been a mistake and will continue to be so.” Would you like to add anything else? “Yes, perhaps the Israeli people assume that if they stop thinking about their own beliefs, it will have very regrettable consequences. But that's not the case. They would simply demonstrate intelligence, intuition, and BEL development. They could focus on other matters and continue to oversee their own interests.”

We invite Konrad Lorenz's BEG to consider the following intuitions. What do you opine about the chronic global pandemic of sexual abuse of women and men of all ages, and its aftermath of intense resentment? Of the reaction of rejection against the illegitimate daughter or son to the point where the father doesn't recognize them, or the mother abandons them, or one or the other mistreats them to the point of biocollapse or, through negligence, exposes them to biocollapse? Of the sexual abuse that, with the mother's connivance, these girls or boys may suffer at the hands of the stepfather in question and/or other close associates, usually close relatives or neighbors; and its aftermath of inevitable resentment. Not to mention the tendency of those affected to revictimize themselves and victimize other people, men or women. Giving rise to an unstoppable cycle of: sexual abuse ó resentment ó illegitimacy ó rejection ó rancor ó revictimization ó frustration and bitterness ó aggression by victimizing others through sexual abuse and many other forms of abuse ó and thus the problem is self-generated. Thus, confirming the importance and frequency of the biosyndrome of the sexually abused and abuser, of the biosyndrome of existential illegitimacy, individual and collective; as well as the deification biosyndrome, individual and collective as well. “It's an honor for me to answer this question. Indeed, doctor, it seems to me that human behavior based on sexual abuse, with the consequences it brings, which you just listed, shows that the earlier the age of sexual abuse, the greater the difficulty in the consequences and the greater the learning process. Well, as you and other BEGs have already mentioned, neural connections are established. Imitation also produces them, and they have been manifested in different cultures. It has been said in this regard how the so-called instinct could intervene as a biological response to justify or deny that what gives rise to resentment and violence, produced by sexual abuse and the rejection of illegitimate children, is the result of that learning. That it results from what has already been learned and, of course, goes in a different direction than what is biologically expected. In other words, the very nature of human behavior has been altered.” If this violent and destructive human response to sexual abuse were biologically determined by instinct, and given its frequency, the human biospecies would surely have already disappeared. “That’s right, doctor, humanity would have disappeared a long time ago,” he said. ¿ What possible contrasts might there be between these human behaviors and those of other mammalian biospecies? “Yes, indeed, doctor, they are very similar responses, in some cases equally learned, however, in these biospecies, with a more evident biological component.” Would you like to add anything else? “It seems to me that humans have not yet found the purpose of their existence and have limited themselves much more than some other biospecies.”

Let us now turn to the BEGs of Mircea Eliade and Claude Levi-Strauss. The myth of the hero abandoned in early childhood and rescued by a young maiden stem from an attempt to hide, first, the illegitimacy of his origin and, second, the sexual abuse he suffered as an infant. A hero with an unknown father because the latter didn't recognize him as a son; with a stepfather –or several– who sexually abused him; and a mother who abandoned the illegitimate son who becomes a hero or a chosen one. –Mircea Eliade: Doctor, the explanation you just gave, so accurately and systematically, curiously breaks with the myth of the hero. That is to say, humans have relied on myths to protect their image in their own eyes and then in their eyes. Thus, the myth is very appropriate for all –or more than one– who want to be heroes. That is to say, this happens very frequently. The hero flees his reality to fictitiously create another one that makes him different, no matter how absurd this may be. ––Claude L: It seems to me, doctor, that the hero is indeed a justification that arises primarily from those who have lived with the upper class of vanity and appearance. That is, they know, understand, and assume or desire to belong to another way of life. Indeed, as Mircea says, the hero flees from guilt and hides behind appearances, creating a Tartuffe scenario. From being illegitimate, he becomes legitimate as a hero. If he is not accepted, the myth makes him a hero, even a deity. For the effort they make to hide what happened feels so overdone that for them it means being worthy of overvaluing themselves. –Is it a legitimacy snatched by force? –Claude L: That's right, doctor, based on lies. That is to say, it ultimately remains illegitimate. Therefore, the myth of the hero is maintained from illegitimacy to illegitimacy, or from illegitimacy to mythical, fictitious, Tartuffe legitimacy. –A similar case is that of the illegitimate and abused daughter, a true heroine as well, although not as notoriously hidden and recognized. –Mircea E: Indeed, doctor, the circumstance of illegitimacy doesn't differentiate by gender. The effect is usually the same. That is, the daughter is rejected, and one way that rejection is made evident is the humiliation inflicted upon her; and subsequently, there is a struggle, a constant effort to become the heroine. That is, seeking to vindicate herself and deny her past. –Claude L: Yes, doctor, indeed, I agree with Mircea. I would add that women have learned illegitimacy, perhaps also by generating life through reproduction, as a fundamental part that denounces illegitimacy. That is, a woman who has experienced illegitimacy, regardless of whether her offspring are not, that woman will experience her offspring as illegitimate. So, now, like that mother, the son or daughter must seek to be a hero or heroine, depending on their case. And with this, they could cause themselves to be humiliated. –The same thing happens with the woman who is supposedly chosen and a heroine, falsely or mythically seen as a virgin, pure, and chaste, mainly within the group of the sanctified. –Mircea E: Your explanation about the sanctified, pure, and chaste virgins, and also chosen and heroic, is very clear and timely. I completely agree with you. –Claude L: Your explanation is very lucid, and there are well-known examples of Tartuffe women who are part of this group.

Claude L. Ruth intuited that this woman or man could also experience a legitimate marriage as illegitimate and illegitimize it with their actions, just as they would with their daughters and sons. For example, through stubborn infidelity or uncontrollable adultery. Likewise, the most serious jealousy could be the paranoid and phobic manifestation of that ancestral, for the person, fear of the experience of illegitimacy that they have precisely endured. Examples of compulsive kleptomania, often in people who don't need to, or unbridled egocentrism, among many other possible examples, could also be evaluated in this sense. All of the above as part of the biosyndrome of the sexually abused and abuser, the biosyndrome of existential illegitimacy, individual and collective, and the deification biosyndrome, individual and collective as well. –Claude L: I find it interesting because it complements the original intuition and rounds out the explanation regarding illegitimacy. That is, it becomes a learning process in which women, and now that you mention it, men too, experience themselves as illegitimate in every aspect of their daily lives. doctor, it seems to me now that the myth of Narcissus is explained by the biosyndrome of the sexually abused and abuser, because they find the need to see their self-image reflected in a sufficiently egocentric way to be able to accept themselves, since it's difficult to accept the reality they live. From there, deification also arises, and you mentioned this at another time, doctor. –Do you want to add anything else? –Mircea E: It's easier, then, doctor, to construct myths than truths or realities. –Claude L: “Doctor, the structures of society are also a myth because they only express a part of reality; the rest is fiction.” … Intellectual and experiential illegitimacy occurs between mentors and protégés when they fail to recognize one another. This is a very common occurrence in all academic, intellectual, and professional institutions and groups around the world. Places where plagiarism of ideas would be a form of intellectual illegitimacy [Ints 09/28/2016 and 04/24/2025]. 

Other BEGs also shared their impressions. –Ludwig W: “The myth of the hero or heroine is related to magic, since the person, through the NMEGO, pretends that the modifications they want will happen, simply because they want it.” Or they need it. “Indeed, doctor, or they need it. Just like magic and other mechanisms of deception or concealment. In magic, and in those other mechanisms, there is also illegitimacy.” –BEGs of local and international journalists: Doctor, now the hero and heroine have diversified in their forms, claiming to assume not the role of responsible parties, but rather as heroes or heroines. For example, the UN, Human Rights, Intelligence Groups, the military, philanthropic and charitable groups, etc. Likewise, illegitimacy has spread, for example, with the feeling of illegally belonging to a country other than the one in which the person was born, with the parasitic feeling or idea of reincarnation, identity theft, with the idea of karma, infidelity, adultery, plagiarism of ideas, etc. – Bertrand R: There's no doubt that throughout the history of humanity there has been a continuity of parasitism. The scientist is rewarded as a hero with the Nobel Prize. –Rita Levi and Madame Curie: Legitimacy lies in existence itself and in what is authentically done. –Babies: Doctor, there are things we still don't understand, such as why there are those who get entangled or try to get entangled in something that doesn't exist. What we do understand is that our BEG now feels that we accept ourselves. And as babies in the womb and in the BML environment, we like to intuit what we have to do to enjoy life. To enjoy life is to live... When we sleep, we have dreams that we are sleeping. Our BEG says that at this moment we are congruent; we intuit the reality we live in. Our opinion is important. –Albert E: Illegitimacy and the hero myth have been taken to levels that seek to deny ET life [sic]. Furthermore, attributing to the UU mythical deities is completely fictitious, baseless and very disrespectful to life [10].

At the bioexperience on August 30, 2014, we casually and unexpectedly invited the BEGs of Mary's sons and daughters. Five BEGs showed up: three women and two men. Of the men, the oldest is Jesus, and the youngest of the five is Judas Ishmael, whose BEG is unclear in order to hide it. From oldest to youngest, the daughters were Zuley, Esther, and Azaé. Mary confirmed that these were her sons and daughters. Spontaneously and unexpectedly, Esther confidently intuited: "Paul's name begins with K, for kilo [sic]..." She spelled it out and completed it as: "Kumwai! That's what they called him," she stated emphatically. Paul confirmed: "That's what they called me because I didn't have one on file, but that's what they called me." Zuley and Azaé stated: “We don’t want to be associated with that family,” which is why they gave these apocryphal names. Since May 20, 2011, we had already learned about the child Judas Ishmael and that he was always kept hidden because he was surely born with physical and intellectual limitations, perhaps due to a chromosomal problem (trisomy 21?). Of course, the child Judas Ishmael always remained locked up in a shack, suffered sexual abuse in childhood, was mistreated, the object of cruel mockery by his family, and a source of shame for Mary, Jesus, and their relatives. The child Judas Ishmael supposedly biocollapsed at fourteen or fifteen years of age due to a severe respiratory infection and resulting cardiorespiratory failure. The birth of the child Judas Ishmael caused one of the first times that Jesus left the family, according to them, "because it would have been obvious to the neighbors" about the incest between Mary and Jesus, the latter being about 16 or 17 years old. 

In the bioexperience of August 30, 2014, to confirm Paul's name, we intuited inviting Nelson Mandela's BEG (political activist), and he biocommunicated his feelings about his arrival in the BEL universe. He replied: "Thank you, doctor. My arrival in the BEL universe is true peace. It's the peace we've been searching for. There are no walls, no battles to win. Now it's time to face life with clarity." We also wanted to know if he recognized the name Kumwai, and he replied with certainty: "Yes, doctor. It's well known among a very ancient community in Africa. This sounds very interesting because it would never be revealed that a Black person was an informed person. It breaks with all belief systems. A group made up of different ethnicities seems logical to me, and thank you for all this effort." 

In the bioexperience of May 26, 2017, the possibility was raised that Azaé was the daughter of Jesus. What can Azaé say? “Excuse me, doctor, but for me he doesn't represent any father figure. Not one of any kind.” Zuley and Esther, what can you say about this discovery? “Now we understand things, doctor, our annoyances and anger.” Mary, what do you add to this matter? “All I have to say is that it's one more knot in this mess.” One more knot that's being untied. “Yes, doctor, one more knot that's being untied.” Jesus, what effect does this matter have on you? “The mirror has cleared up, and it's a discovery, doctor. Your intuition is correct, that's right.” Mary's father may have been Zuley's father. 

At the BELC carried out on October 4, 2015, I intuited it was advisable to question and, if possible, reveal how conflictive and aggressive the relationship between Mary and Jesus was. She admitted to having beaten Jesus since childhood and frequently forcing him to satisfy her every whim, just as she was abused by her father, Jesus's alleged grandfather and father. Esther, Zuley, and Azaé, Mary's daughters, agreed that this was the case, that she even kicked him out of the house, and that Jesus, Azaé claimed, always had to return to "apologize."

The failure to provide a coherent and realistic explanation of how, for example, homosexuality arises has created confusion, bewilderment, and often bitter, pointless arguments due to the lack of a precise explanation of how homosexual behavior, stuttering, or severe autism originate and persist. What happens is that the impact of childhood sexual abuse is hidden, as it occurs during a sensitive period in a child's life when, by imitating his/her parents, they are establishing the imprints (or learned patterns) of their sexual role, language, and spontaneous behavior. This can contribute to the development of homosexuality, stuttering, and some forms of autism by affecting their sexual role, fluent speech, and spontaneous response to external stimuli, respectively.

Through sexual imprinting, young animals learn mate preferences at an early age by observing and learning to imitate their parents as role models, as is the case with humans and many other animal species. Natural sexual imprinting even prevents inbreeding, or mating with relatives, and avoids endogamy, or mating between close members of a community.

I reiterate, homosexuality is not an illness, a condition, a disorder, or an anomaly. It is a different and untimely imprinting or learning process, modified by sexual abuse during a sensitive period of childhood.

In summary, childhood sexual abuse creates an imprint (a learned behavior) that influences the development of traits such as homosexuality, stuttering, and some forms of autism, including the most severe. In response, individuals who suffered sexual abuse in childhood—or in adolescence or adulthood—may exhibit a wide range of self-harming behaviors and symptoms, including intense resentment toward their abusers, drug use, alcoholism, rejection of their genitals, or antisocial behavior. They may also become perpetrators of rape against minors, adolescents, and adults, and are often chronic seducers, sex addicts (sex, sex, sex, everything is sex), and sexually abuse their own young children. Besides, mythomania, aggression, they conceal the event, they are very uncomfortable talking about the sexual abuse they suffered. Bisexuality (homo-heterosexuality) helps to keep up appearances, even when having children. Medical researchers and psychologists investigate everything, but they don't deal with childhood abuse. I ask you, why do you avoid investigating the effects that childhood sexual abuse has on men, women, and humanity?

Child sexual abuse is an immoral, offensive, reprehensible, and highly damaging act, not only for the victims but also for all of humanity, which is declining in its growth and stability. It is a very destructive act for humanity, even more so than most local armed conflicts, since sexual abuse is a universal aggression against children that affects increasingly larger groups in all populations of the world, and nothing and no one stops its increase. No one opposes or stops it: not the authorities, not scientists, not intellectuals, not politicians, not medical or psychological specialists, not religious figures (who are themselves among the main and most active perpetrators and abusers of children), not the media, not film, not television, not social networks, not even families themselves (the primary breeding ground for child sexual abuse). Except for isolated protests or denunciations that are soon forgotten. With the aggravating factor that minors, boys and girls, who suffered sexual abuse in childhood, will tend to become sexual aggressors of adults and, of course, of minors as well. A vicious cycle that feeds on itself. I urge you to denounce it, oppose it until it is stopped. The children will thank us. You can punish and imprison as many rapists as you catch, but the problem will only be controlled when the sexual abuse of minors, boys and girls, is stopped.

I clarify that it is logical to assume that the imprint of homosexuality is present in other all animal species. This is a result of the fact that early sexual experience may also happen in other animal species.

1. BELC of July 25, 2010, data provided by religious figures: John the Baptist and Judas Thaddeus did not exist. ?BELC of August 2, 2016: Dimas and Gestas did not exist; nor does the BEG of any of the four exist. The BEGs of the thieves who were accused at that time did not know that Jesus had been crucified. ?BELC of July 20, 2012: Esther, the second daughter of Mary, informed us that Paul was black-skinned and had curly hair and that his real name was Kumwai. Paul and the rest of the religious figures confirmed this, and Nelson Mandela confirmed the ancestral African origin of Paul's real name. ?Jesus, Mary, and Joseph did not know how to count, weigh, measure objects or distances, read, or write. ?Let us recall that, at the BELC on July 25, 2014, Jesus admitted that he was not circumcised and that this topic had never been discussed.
2. Mary, Joseph, and Jesus. 1. There was no Last Supper. 2. There was no crown of thorns for Jesus, 3. There was no injury to his chest. 4. He was not nailed in the hands or feet. 5. There was no Stations of the Cross. 6. Jesus biocollapsed after turning seventy years old. 7. Based on the information you’ve provided, it’s reasonable to doubt whether there was punishment on the cross and a previous journey carrying it or not, okay? “Okay, doctor.” Therefore, the Crucifixion actually refers to the cross and fiction, the fiction of the cross. Shall we agree on that? "Yes, doctor, that's what we agree it is."
3. Religious claims of all kinds, especially those regarding the existence of deities and other celestial presences, turn out to be nothing more than falsehoods. Consequently, humanity has been deceived ever since these claims emerged and spread.
4. When I searched Google Scholar for information on childhood sexual abuse in 2024, the platform hid some articles. When I searched for the book "Bayer R. Homosexuality and American Psychiatry: The Politics of Diagnosis. Princeton University Press. Princeton, New Jersey. Edited by Princeton Paperback Printing. 1987," it was cited, but when I activated the citation, a chapter on sexual topics from an unidentifiable book appeared. In addition, other references I had already consulted disappeared. When I continued my search, Google Scholar blocked my access indefinitely. I have not checked it again. See conclusion 9.
5. Don't developed Western countries boast of being the most technically and scientifically advanced and mock other countries? And how ethically developed are they? Don't they realize that the birth rate in the West is declining uncontrollably, without honestly and sincerely asking themselves the cause? Of course, it's not just pollution. So why do they behave like medieval censors?
6. In any case, due to the evident inability to redirect their impulses, humans appear more savage than they suppose. And the most obvious effect is the reckless destruction of the environment, with the consequent disappearance of plant and animal biospecies. Including the hopeless human species in the foreground.
7. Earthlings should establish BELC with ET humans so they can understand the extent of the disaster they cause when impertinent humans from various locations around the universe destroy their planet's entire ecosystem. The Earthlings' current problem is that their multiple businesses are more important than any other matter. ET humans responded similarly. Earthlings are nothing more than ordinary humanity.
8. The Biblical Old Testament fostered and predisposed the emergence of both the Biblical New Testament and the Quran. For centuries, and even now, these three documents have been used to provoke and carry out crimes, acts of repression, and war with very serious consequences for the peoples of the countries involved. The question—or conclusion—then arises: how much disorientation and harm have these same three documents caused, are causing, and will continue to cause to humanity? And for how long? 

All religions have an equally disorienting effect on the people who follow them. And for how long?

And what about the homosexuality that the vast majority of priests and nuns display as a result of the sexual abuse they suffered in childhood and who, as adults, perpetuate it by, in turn, abusing of minors of age? And for how long? 

9. STOP THE SEXUAL ABUSE OF CHILDREN. IT IS DESTROYING HUMANITY…

I acknowledge Ruth A. López-Téllez for her clever assistance and permanent help.

None

1. Cuevas-Sosa A (2019) Authorized biography of Jesus, Mary, Joseph and their disciples. Grosvenor House Publishing Ltd., UK.
2. Ibid., 311.
3. Ibid., 267.
4. Ibid., 274.
5. Ibid., 480.
6. Ibid., 327.
7. Ibid., 327.
8. Ibid., 480.
9. Ibid., 519.
10. Ibid., 327.