The intricate dialogue between endocrine signaling and immune-inflammatory homeostasis at the maternal-fetal interface remains one of the most complex frontiers in reproductive biology. In the recent review titled “Hormonal imbalance-mediated immune inflammation in endometrial decidualization disorder,” Yu et al., provide a masterly synthesis of how the disruption of this dialogue underpins the pathophysiology of endometriosis-associated infertility [1]. By moving beyond a reductionist view of hormonal deficiency, the authors delineate a self-perpetuating cycle where estrogen dominance and progesterone resistance act as both the drivers and the consequence of a chronic inflammatory state.
At the molecular core of this disorder lies a profound breakdown in homeostatic feedback loops. The authors highlight the critical role of the Estrogen-Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) axis, where the local hyperestrogenism stimulates COX-2 expression, leading to elevated PGE2 levels [2]. This, in turn, acts as a potent stimulus for aromatase activity, further escalating local estrogen production. This feedforward mechanism is not merely an endocrine aberration; it is a primary driver of immune reprogramming. Through the activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway, this environment facilitates the transcriptional silencing of the progesterone receptor B (PR-B) isoform, effectively rendering the endometrium “blind” to the pro-gestational signals required for decidual transformation [3].
The immunological consequences of this hormonal landscape are equally significant. Yu et al., describe a shift in the endometrial microenvironment from receptive tolerance to inflammatory activation. The review synthesize evidence on how the failure of progesterone signaling—compounded by estrogen excess—shifts the maternal-fetal interface toward a pro-inflammatory state. This is characterized by the dominance of M1 macrophages over M2, a Th1-biased helper T-cell response, and the accumulation of cytotoxic uterine Natural Killer cells. These shifts collectively disrupted the immune tolerance required for successful decidualization, providing a clear explanation for why standard assisted reproductive technologies often come out with lower success rates in patients with severe endometriosis [4].
From a clinical perspective, this synthesis offers a compelling rationale for multi- modal therapeutic strategies. The authors identify promising strategies such as the use of Dienogest —not merely as a hormonal suppressant, but as a dual-action agent that restores the PR-B/PR-α ratio while inhibiting aromatase-mediated inflammation [5]. Furthermore, the discussion of emerging technologies, specifically single-cell RNA sequencing and endometrial organoids, signals a transition toward precision medicine. These tools allow for the mapping of individual immune and hormonal signatures, potentially dictating personalized fertility treatments in the future [6].
In summary, Yu et al., have successfully framed endometriosis-associated infertility as a systemic failure of the immuno-endocrine dialogue. By integrating the disparate threads of endocrinology, immunology, and molecular biology into a unified narrative, this work provides a vital framework for understanding the “endometrial factor.” This review stands as an essential resource for researchers and clinicians seeking to translate complex molecular interactions into improved reproductive outcomes.
Citation: Liao M, Qin A (2026) The Immuno-Endocrine Feedback Loop for Endometrial Decidualization in Endometriosis. HSOA J Reprod Med Gynaecol Obstet 11: 211.
Copyright: © 2026 Ming Liao, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.