Aluminium (Al) is the third most common element in the Earth’s crust [1] and is naturally present in the environment. Al is a versatile metal with several properties and has a wide range of uses. Al is used in different alloys with other metals such copper, zinc or magnesium [2].
The concentrations of this metal in food and drink have been increasing over time due to the acidification of the soils that transfers the aluminium from the soil to the aquatic environment [3] and anthropogenic activities such as mining (bauxite extraction), aluminium industries, and others [2].
Diet is the main exposure route to metals [4]. Aluminium is found in different drinks and foods such as drinking water, where it is added as a flocculant (aluminium sulphate, Al2(SO4)3), processed foods, where it is used as an additive and as a result of the packaging used and even in fresh foods such as vegetables and fruit because of the Al contained in the soils [5].
In addition, aluminium utensils and tea consumption are also responsible for the increase of the Al in the diet [2]. Tea leaves have been reported to have higher Al levels because tea plants are grown in acidic soils [5].
Al is present in an ionic form as Al3+. The absorption of Al depends on several factors such as the pH level, the presence of organic acids (citrate, lactate), etc [2,6].
The oral bioavailability of Al, which is the amount that can be absorbed, in drinking water is around 0.3%, while this is approximately 0.1% in food and drinks [7]. Al absorption increases as the pH level decreases.
Aluminium is a toxic metal that does not have a function in the human and animal organism [8]. The toxicity of Al depends on the exposure route and the solubility of the aluminium compounds [9]. Aluminium tends to accumulate in the body, in tissues such as the brain, bones, kidney and liver. Long-term exposure to low Al levels leads to toxic effects [10].
Based on information provided by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), the exposure of the European population to Al is 28.6-214 µg/kg body weight per day [11].
Because of the abovementioned reasons, different institutions have established maximum limit intake levels for aluminium. The EFSA has established a Tolerable Weekly Intake (TWI) of 1 mg Al per kg of bodyweight [7]. The FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives, has evaluated the Al bioavailability and concluded by setting a Provisional Tolerable Weekly Intake (PTWI) of 2 mg/kg of bodyweight/week [12], and this value is twice that the established by EFSA.
Since Al is a toxic metal found in foods and beverages, the data previously obtained by our research group and others have been compiled to compare the levels of aluminium content in different types of food and drinks to study the toxic risk from the diet, and to compare the levels found over time to estimate the general variations in Al content.
The present study was conducted from March 2017 to May 2017. The review of the scientific papers was performed with online databases such as the Web of Sciences (WOS), MEDLINE (PubMed), Google Scholar, Research Gate and the library of the Universidad de La Laguna, where versions of most important scientific journals are found. The aim of the review was to compile the aluminium levels in different food groups and the relevant information about the methodology, toxic effects, limits, etc.
Search terms used were “aluminium”, “aluminium levels”, “aluminium neurological damages”, “inductively coupled plasma”, “ICP-OES”, “aluminium toxicity”, “toxic metals”, “Alzheimer”, “food additives”, “provisional tolerable weekly intake aluminium”, “tolerable weekly intake aluminium”, “aluminium sources”, “aluminium exposure”, “aluminium metabolism”, “spectrophotometry”, “food composition”, “food analysis”, “contaminants”, “ICP-AES”, and “atomic emission spectroscopy”.
The papers reporting Al levels in the most commonly consumed foods using the analytical techniques with the highest levels accuracy and precision for Al determination were selected. The studies where a quality control using reference materials was not included were excluded to ensure the quality of the selected studies. In addition, the included papers were classified into two periods: “before 2000” and “after 2000”.
Sources of aluminium in the environment
Aluminium is found in the environment released by natural and anthropogenic processes (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Aluminium environmental sources.
Al is present in the Earth’s crust as a part of silicates (mica or feldspar), hydroxo oxides like bauxite, which are used to extract aluminium and cryolite (Na3AlF6) [13,14].
Environmental transport and distribution of aluminium depends on its coordination chemistry [15]. Acidification of soils is a cause of aluminium release in an ionic form (Al3+) to the aquatic systems. Al3+ is highly soluble in water.
Regarding anthropogenic sources, industrial processes and mining are the main routes of aluminium release into the environment, mainly into the atmosphere. Al content in food packaging and in cooking utensils is an important route of Al release into the environment [15]. Al is also found in drugs, cosmetics and food additives, whose residues can release Al into the environment.
Absorption
Aluminium is absorbed in a proportion of 0.1-0.3% by the gastrointestinal tract, and occurs in the upper intestine [2] where absorption is higher due to lower pH levels [16].
Absorption of aluminium from foods and drinks depends on numerous factors. Several studies have reported the higher aluminium absorption when citrate and fluoride are present [2,14,16,17]. Meanwhile, the presence of silicon and calcium decrease aluminium absorption [16] due to the formation of insoluble products with aluminium, the above mentioned compounds are frequently found in processed food as additives.
Transport and distribution
When Al is absorbed it reaches the blood bound to transferrin molecules and circulates across the blood-brain barrier. Al3+ can bind with the transferrin molecule thanks to its oxidative state which is the same as the serum iron (Fe3+) [18].
Figure 2 shows the transferrin-transferrin pathway. Aluminium bound to the transferring molecule enters the cell, where there are transferrin molecule receptors [1,2]. The Al-transferrin complex, binding to the transferrin receptors, is inside the cytosol, where it experiences a decrease of pH level at 5.5 and Al3+ is released from the complex [19].
Figure 2: Transferrin-transferrin pathway.
Elimination
The kidneys eliminate the absorbed aluminium in amounts of 15-55 µg/day through urine and faeces [2,16]. Al excretion is lower in people with reduced renal function and this can lead to toxic effects because of the nephrotoxicity of Al [14,16].
Mechanism of aluminium toxicity
Aluminium can interfere with certain essential elements such calcium and calcium metabolism is one of the most important processes in the human organism. Aluminium has been shown to be able to replace Ca disrupting the mineralization and bone cell growth [9,20]. However, other studies have reported that Al can increase the stability of IRP2 (Iron Regulatory Protein-2), which is a protein whose function is the regulation of the iron levels [9].
Aluminium is considered to be a neurotoxic agent that could increase the probability of developing Alzheimer’s disease [1,21-25]. In addition, Al can lead to cognitive damage and neurological diseases. The probability of having any of these diseases is higher in children and people with kidney problems because the kidney plays a key role in the excretion of Al [25].
Analytical methods in food samples
The analytical methods used for the determination of aluminium in food samples, consists of a first step of solubilisation of the samples. The samples are previously treated with microwave-assisted acid digestion or with an incineration process to obtain ashes [25,26]. The consulted authors used with a quality control process using certified reference materials for Al, which was treated under the same conditions as the samples.
The most commonly used methods of aluminium measurement are Fame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (FAAS), Graphite-Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (GFAAS), Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical/atomic Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES/AES) or inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). These methods provide a high selectivity, with low detection limits (0.1 mg/kg or lower) [26,27]. Table 1 shows the comparison between the Limit of Detection (LOD) and the necessary sample volume of the different techniques for aluminium determination.
Technique |
Sample volume required |
LOD (ng/mL) |
Reference |
FAAS |
1 mL |
30 |
Skoog et al. [28] |
GFAAS |
0.5-10 µL |
0.2 |
Skoog et al. [28] |
ICP-AES |
20-100 µL |
0.2 |
Skoog et al. [28] |
ICP-OES |
20-100 µL |
4 |
Luis et al. [4] |
ICP-MS |
20-100 µL |
0.003 |
Lloyd et al. [29] |
Table 1: Comparison of the LOD (ng/mL) and the volume of sample required between the different analytical techniques used in Al determination.
Some of the above techniques are based on Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (AAS). AAS is a modern technique with the following advantages: non-spectral interferences and low levels of chemical interference, high-accuracy and sensitivity, and chemical separations are not normally required [28].
However, techniques based on inductively coupled plasma are used the most because of their high stability and lack of interferences. In addition, this technique offers a simultaneous multi-element determination. Cost and maintenance are the main problems with this technique [4,28,30,31].
Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (FAAS)
This technique is based on the flame as the atomization system. The sensitivity, precision and accuracy of FAAS are of a high quality in wavelengths between 200-800 nm. However, the atomization through flame needs a high-volume of sample (1 mL approximately) and a high-flow of flame gases (10 mL per minute) that produce a short-residence time of the analyte [28].
Graphite-Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (GFAAS)
This analytical technique has certain advantages and is based on an electrochemical atomization system [28]. Strict temperature control is required to assure a high reproducibility. The atomization of the analyte is quick and practically quantitative. GFAAS provides high sensitivity with a small sample volume (0.5-10 µL).
Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical/atomic Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES/AES)
Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES) is an optical method whose measurement is based on energy exchange between electromagnetic radiation and the matter. The main advantages are the quickness, relatively low detection limits, wide concentration ranges, automation and the wide instrumentation available [4,28].
Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry (ICP-AES) is a technique based on Atomic Emission Spectrometry (AES). Certain instrumental conditions restrict the use of this technique to the analysis of certain elements because: the detectors provide an acceptable sensitivity only in a specific wavelength range, the flame has a strong absorption at wavelengths < 200 nm, and oxygen absorbs with UV radiation. However, AES equipment can provide good results in the wavelength range between 190-850 nm [28,30,31].
Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS)
ICP-MS is an analytical technique able to develop multi-elemental analysis with a high sensitivity [32]. The mass spectrometer increases sensitivity [2]. The mass spectrometer splits the ionic species according to their mass/charge proportionality [28,33]. The main disadvantage concerns matrix effects (non-spectroscopic interferences) which are produced by electrostatic effects in the generation stage of the aerosol.
Aluminium levels in food and drinks
Aluminium concentrations in foods depend on several factors. Aluminium found in foods is from different origins. Aluminium levels can be found naturally in foods, but these levels can be higher due to the use of food additives (sulphates, phosphates, silicates, etc.) and the use of cooking utensils made of aluminium [34].
Water and drinks
Table 2 shows the average Al levels (mg/kg) in water and selected drinks reported by different authors.
Product |
Number of samples |
Al mean content (mg/L) ± SD |
Origin |
Reference |
Water |
Water |
20 |
0.12 ± 0.06 |
Spain |
González-Weller et al. [25]1 |
Mineral water, spring water and table water |
171 |
2 |
Germany |
Stahl et al. [35]2 |
Drinking water |
3 |
0.016 ± 0.0004 |
Jordan |
Sweileh et al. [36]3 |
Tap water |
3 |
0.026 ± 0.0006 |
Jordan |
Sweileh et al. [36]3 |
Non-alcoholic drinks |
Soft drinks |
20 |
1.24 ± 0.70 |
Spain |
González-Weller et al. [25]1 |
Soft drinks (Non-cola, cans) |
106 |
0.90 |
Australia |
Duggan et al. [37] |
Soft drinks (Cola, cans) |
0.66 |
Australia |
Duggan et al. [37] |
Soft drinks (Non-cola, glass bottle) |
0.15 |
Australia |
Duggan et al. [37] |
Soft drinks (Cola, glass bottle) |
0.24 |
Australia |
Duggan et al. [37] |
Fruit juice and fruit juice drinks |
59 |
3 |
Germany |
Stahl et al. [35]2 |
Fruit juices |
- |
0.043-4.130* |
USA |
Schenk et al. [38] |
Alcoholic drinks |
Wine and fruit drinks |
65 |
2 |
Germany |
Stahl et al. [35]2 |
Wine |
20 |
2.42 ± 2.03 |
Spain |
González-Weller et al. [25]1 |
Beer and draught beer |
237 |
0.50 |
Germany |
Stahl et al. [35]2 |
Alcoholic beverages (gin, whiskey, rum, beer) |
20 |
0.50 ± 0.32 |
Spain, England, Scotland, The Netherlands |
González-Weller et al. [25]1 |
Tea, herbal infusions and coffee |
Sweetened tea infusions |
3 |
2.2 ± 0.1 |
Jordan |
Sweileh et al. [36]3 |
Tea infusions |
3 |
2.1 ± 0.1 |
Jordan |
Sweileh et al. [36]3 |
Arabian coffee |
3 |
0.63 ± 0.03 |
Jordan |
Sweileh et al. [36]3 |
Herbal teas |
- |
0.14-1.065* |
USA |
Schenk et al. [38] |
Instant coffee |
- |
0.02-0.581* |
USA |
Schenk et al. [38] |
Whole coffee |
- |
0.235-1.163* |
USA |
Schenk et al. [38] |
Table 2: Mean aluminium content in drinking water and other drinks.
Aluminium is present in drinking water, where it is added as a flocculant or coagulant like sulphate (Al2(SO4)3). The lowest Al level found in drinking water and bottled drinking water is 0.12 mg/L from Spain [25]. On the other hand, the highest Al level was found in water from Germany with an average content of 2 mg/L [35].
Al levels found in several types of non-alcoholic drinks were higher than those found in water. The highest levels were found in fruit juice and fruit juice drinks from Germany, with a mean content of 3 mg/L [35]. In general terms, the beverages which were stored in aluminium cans contained higher Al levels, but the consulted studies did not confirm the statistical differences between aluminium cans, glass bottles and plastic containers [35].
Regarding alcoholic drinks, wine is the beverage showing the highest Al levels at 2.42 mg/L in Spanish wines [25], and 2 mg/L in German wines [35]. The high acidity of the soils where the grapes were grown may explain these high Al contents.
With respect to tea, tea (Camellia sinensis) leaves are known to make a notable contribution to the dietary intake of Al, due to the acidity of the soil where the plant is grown, because these plants are acidophilic [39]. A study conducted by Sweileh et al., [36] reported an average Al concentration of 312 ± 18 µg/g in tea infusions, however, the brewed tea infusions were found to have lower concentrations (2.1 ± 0.1 mg/L). Other studies reported Al concentrations in brewed tea ranging between 3-4 mg/L, these concentrations are 10 times higher than those found in coffee [40].
Tea infusions can contribute 50% of the total daily intake of Al in cases of high consumption.
Fruit and vegetables
Table 3 shows the mean Al content (mg/kg) in selected fruit and vegetables according to country of origin.
Product |
Number of samples |
Al mean content (mg/kg) ± SD |
Origin |
Reference |
Vegetables |
Green beans, cooked |
- |
3.4 |
USA |
Soni et al. [15] |
Potato, baked |
- |
26 |
USA |
Soni et al. [15] |
Potato, cooked |
- |
10.8 |
India |
Soni et al. [15] |
Potatoes |
20 |
5.88 ± 3.29 |
Spain |
González-Weller et al. [25]1 |
Potatoes |
- |
0.90 |
USA |
MAFF [41] |
Squash, carrots, marrow, cabbage, watercress, spinach |
20 |
27.47 ± 38.47 |
Spain |
González-Weller et al. [25]1 |
Tomatoes and onions |
20 |
5.41 ± 2.16 |
Spain |
González-Weller et al. [25]1 |
Asparagus |
- |
4.4 |
USA |
Greger et al. [42] |
Green vegetables |
- |
3.1 |
USA |
MAFF [41] |
Fruits |
Apple sauce |
- |
0.10 |
USA |
Soni et al. [15] |
Apple, fresh |
- |
0.14 |
USA |
Pennington [43] |
Apples and citrus |
20 |
4.73 ± 3.33 |
Spain |
González-Weller et al. [25]1 |
Banana, fresh |
- |
0.05 |
USA |
Pennington [43] |
Banana |
20 |
32.80 ± 33.05 |
Spain |
González-Weller et al. [25]1 |
Peaches, pears, plums |
20 |
9.68 ± 6.88 |
Spain |
González-Weller et al. [25]1 |
Table 3: Mean aluminium content in selected fruit and vegetables.
-Unknown number of samples
1Study conducted using ICP-OES
2Study conducted using ICP-MS
The aluminium in vegetables and fruits depends on the irrigation water, the soils where they grow, the plant variety, etc.
During the growth of the plant, Al is transferred from the soil to the different parts of the plant. Depending on the species, some of which tend to accumulate higher Al concentrations in the roots, while others such as the tea plant accumulate higher Al levels in the leaves [44-46].
In regard to vegetables, the highest Al levels were reported by González-Weller et al., [25] in the vegetable group of squashes, carrots, marrow, cabbage, watercress and spinach from Spain, with an average Al concentration of 27.5 mg/kg. Baked potatoes from USA had a high Al level, with an average level of 26 mg/kg [15]. The lowest Al concentrations were reported by Soni et al., [15] in cooked green beans (3.40 mg/kg).
The highest Al level found in fruit was that reported by González-Weller et al. [25] in bananas from Spain, with a mean content of 32.8 mg/kg. This concentration is much higher than that found by Soni et al., [15] in bananas from USA, with a mean concentration of 0.40 mg/kg.
Animal products
Table 4 shows the mean Al concentration (mg/kg) in different animal products according to origin.
Product |
Number of samples |
Al mean content (mg/kg) ± SD |
Origin |
Reference |
Fresh meat |
Poultry, rabbit |
20 |
6.35 ± 2.83 |
Spain |
González-Weller et al. [25]1 |
Viscera |
20 |
11.19 ± 6.42 |
Spain |
González-Weller et al. [25]1 |
Red meat |
40 |
9.31 ± 4.85 |
Spain |
González-Weller et al. [25]1 |
Porcine meat (muscle) |
- |
0.21 |
France |
Leblanc et al. [48]2 |
Porcine meat (kidney) |
- |
0.52 |
France |
Leblanc et al. [48]2 |
Processed meat products |
Ham |
20 |
1.99 ± 0.44 |
Spain, Italy |
González-Weller et al. [25]1 |
Ham, cooked |
- |
1.2 |
USA |
Greger et al. [42] |
Sausage, bologna, salami |
20 |
3.06 ± 1.09 |
Spain, Italy |
González-Weller et al. [25]1 |
Hamburger |
- |
2.00 |
USA |
Soni et al. [15] |
Milk and its derivates |
Cheddar cheese |
- |
3.9 ± 3.9 |
USA |
Saiyed and Yokel [40]3 |
Processed American cheese slices |
- |
470 ± 200 |
USA |
Saiyed and Yokel [40]3 |
American pasteurized prepared cheese |
- |
6.6 ± 4.4 |
USA |
Saiyed and Yokel [40]3 |
Natural cheese |
- |
1.57 |
USA |
Soni et al. [15] |
Processed cheese |
- |
29.7 |
USA |
Soni et al. [15] |
Soft cheese |
- |
0.4 |
Greece, Turkey |
Elbarbary and Hamouda [49]3 |
Milk, whole |
20 |
0.37 ± 0.09 |
Spain |
González-Weller et al. [25]1 |
Milk, skimmed and semi skimmed |
20 |
0.82 ± 1.59 |
Spain |
González-Weller et al. [25]1 |
Milk |
- |
0.70 |
USA |
Soni et al. [15] |
Yogurt |
40 |
0.82 ± 0.50 |
Spain |
González-Weller et al. [25]1 |
Plain yogurt |
36 |
0.72 ± 0.57 |
Spain |
Luis et al. [4]1 |
Flavored yogurt |
36 |
0.45 ± 0.27 |
Spain |
Luis et al. [4]1 |
Eggs |
Hens’ eggs (homogenized) |
40 |
2.93 ± 2.95 |
Spain |
González-Weller et al. [25]1 |
Hens’ eggs |
- |
0.107 |
USA |
Schenk et al. [38] |
Table 4: Mean aluminium content in animal products.
-Unknown number of samples
1Study conducted using ICP-OES
2Study conducted using ICP-MS
3Study conducted using FAAS/GFAAS
Aluminium, as in humans, is accumulated in animals from the water, the diet and environmental pollution [47]. In addition, in the case of processed products such as cheese, the use of Al-based additives in cheese production processes is a source of Al in these products.
Regarding the Al levels in fresh meat, the highest level was found in viscera from Spain, with an average concentration of 11.2 mg/kg [25], whereas the lowest level was reported in porcine meat (muscle) from France, with a mean Al level of 0.21 mg/kg [48].
The hamburger from the USA was the processed meat product with the highest Al level with a mean concentration of 20 mg/kg. This could be explained by the use of Al-additives.
Finally, the highest concentration of Al found in milk and its derivates was that found in processed American cheese slices from the USA, with an average content of 470 mg/kg, this is due to the use of sodium aluminium phosphate as the emulsifying agent in processed cheeses [15,40].
Fish and other seafood
Table 5 shows the Al content (mg/kg) in different fish and seafood depending on the origin. As a result of the acidification of the soils, soluble aluminium (Al
3+) can reach the aquatic environment easily. In addition, pollution from anthropogenic activities is an important means of releasing Al into the marine environment. However, Al accumulation in fish, marine plants and other organism depends on several factors such as the species, age, sex, etc [60,61]. Several studies have reported that the aluminium polymerization from aqueous aluminium, which takes place in a pH of between 5.0 and 6.0, which leads to acute toxicity in fish because it causes damage to the functioning of fish gills resulting in respiratory and ion regulatory dysfunctions [62,63].
Product |
Number of samples |
Al mean content (mg/kg) ± SD |
Origin |
Reference |
Fresh fish |
Mullus surmuletus (Red rock mullet) |
16 |
3.48 ± 3.96 |
Spain |
Dorta et al. [50]1 |
Pseudupeneus prayensis (African mullet) |
12 |
0.92 ± 0.71 |
Spain |
Dorta et al. [50]1 |
Sarpa salpa |
40 |
2.86 ± 2.23 |
Spain |
Afonso et al. [51]1 |
Chelon labrosus |
40 |
2.84 ± 2.69 |
Spain |
Afonso et al. [51]1 |
White fish |
20 |
3.57 ± 3.23 |
Spain, Morocco, South Africa, Mauritania |
González-Weller et al. [25]1 |
Oily fish |
20 |
3.90 ± 1.97 |
Spain, Morocco, South Africa, Mauritania |
González-Weller et al. [25]1 |
Fish |
- |
0.40 |
USA |
Soni et al. [15] |
Trachurus genera (blue jack mackerel) |
60 |
1.343-49.24* |
Turkey |
Özden [52]2 |
Trachurus genera |
24 |
10 |
Turkey |
Küpeli et al. [53]1 |
Trachurus genera |
142 |
2.408-5.857* |
Spain |
Rivas et al. [54]3 |
Saurida undosquamis |
45 |
0.831 |
Turkey |
Türkmen et al. [55]3 |
Sparus aurata |
45 |
0.919 |
Turkey |
Türkmen et al. [55]3 |
Mullus barbatus |
45 |
2.228 |
Turkey |
Türkmen et al. [55]3 |
Seafood |
Sepia officinalis (cuttlefish) |
- |
10.2 |
Spain |
Villanueva and Bustamante [56]2 |
A crassispina (sea urchin) |
26 |
26.9 ± 30.1 |
South Korea |
Choi et al. [57]1 |
S. japonicus (sea cucumber) |
63 |
30.3 ± 25.1 |
South Korea |
Choi et al. [57]1 |
H. roretzi (sea squirts) |
67 |
38.8 ± 22.6 |
South Korea |
Choi et al. [57]1 |
S. plicata (warty sea squirts) |
66 |
204.6 ± 166.4 |
South Korea |
Choi et al. [57]1 |
Seaweed |
Red seaweed |
18 |
27.1 ± 22.6 |
Asian and European Union |
Rubio et al. [29]1 |
Brown seaweed |
22 |
7.43 ± 5.26 |
Asian and European Union |
Rubio et al. [29]1 |
Laminaria (brown seaweed) and Porphira (red seaweed) |
- |
8.78 ± 18.6 |
Spain |
Larrea-Marín et al. [58]1 |
Laver |
53 |
15.5 ± 9.36 |
South Korea |
Khan et al. [59]2 |
Sea tangle |
45 |
4.89 ± 4.15 |
South Korea |
Khan et al. [56]2 |
Sea mustard |
58 |
4.14 ± 3.36 |
South Korea |
Khan et al. [56]2 |
Hijiki |
27 |
6.56 ± 4.47 |
South Korea |
Khan et al. [56]2 |
Gulf weed |
15 |
52.1 ± 7.34 |
South Korea |
Khan et al. [56]2 |
Table 5: Mean aluminium content in different fish and seafood according to country of origin.
*Maximum and minimum value, respectively
-Unknown number of samples
1Study conducted using ICP-OES
2Study conducted using ICP-MS
3Study conducted using FAAS/GFAAS
As for fresh fish, the highest Al levels were reported in samples of oily fish (3.90 mg/kg) from Spain, Morocco, South Africa and Mauritania [25].
Seafood is the group with the highest reported Al levels, with an average Al concentration of 204.6 mg/kg in warty sea squirts from South Korea [57]. This fact could be explained by the characteristics of the organisms, e.g., cephalopods which filter the water and thereby accumulate higher metal contents [64,65].
Al content in edible seaweeds is higher than in fish, reaching an Al level of 52.1 mg/kg in gulfweed (microalgae) from South Korea [59]. Seaweeds can accumulate metals present in the aquatic environment and in several cases, seaweeds can act as bio indicator of marine contamination as a method of monitoring the pollution [66].
Estimation of the spatiotemporal aluminium levels along the time
Figures 3, 4, 5 and 6 show the general evolution of the Al content in the different types of food analysed by the consulted authors.
Figure 3: Aluminium evolution in water and other drinks in the period 1989 – 2014.
Figure 4: Aluminium evolution in fruit and vegetables in the period 1985 – 2010.
Figure 5: Aluminium evolution in animal products in the period 1985 – 2015.
Figure 6: Aluminium evolution in marine products in the period 2002 – 2017.
Al levels in drinking water and other beverages have increased over time and this fact can be explained by the use of Al-based compounds in the treatment of drinking water [21].
In the case of fruit and vegetables, the Al concentration was highest in 2010, and it should be mentioned that the highest concentrations were found in selected fruit and vegetables from the Canary Islands (Spain), where the crop soils are acidic as a result of the volcanic nature of the islands [25].
On the other hand, Al levels in different animal products have decreased over time.
Al concentrations in different marine products peaked in some cases in 2010, 2014 and 2015. However, Al levels between 2015 and 2017 were slightly lower than in the first period (2002-2014). Nevertheless, there are wide differences in marine products between the areas where the products where collected.
The differences of Al levels over time may be due to the development of analytical techniques, which are currently able to detect lower levels. However, the wide use of Al-packaging to preserve food and acidification of soils can lead to higher Al levels in food.
Estimation of the dietary intake
The Tolerable Weekly Intake (TWI) set by the EFSA at 1 mg/kg body weight/week [7] and, the average consumption data of each food group for children and adults given by the AESAN (Spanish Agency of Food Safety and Nutrition) have been used to estimate the Al dietary intake [67]. The average consumption data by the Spanish population are: roots and tubers (67.6 g/day children, 71.71 g/day adults), vegetables (95.35 g/day children, 189.12 g/day adults), fish and seafood (63.3 g/day children, 94.41 g/day adults), eggs (24.34 g/day children, 31.21 g/day adults), fruits (211.45 g/day children, 259.56 g/day adults), milk and its derivates (428.37 g/day children, 350.52 g/day adults), meat and its derivates (153.8 g/day children, 167.15 g/day adults), beverages (42.61 g/day children, 128.55 g/day adults).
Table 6 shows the Estimated Daily Intake (EDI), which is the approximated intake of Al per day, and the percentages of contribution to the TWI of aluminium from the diet. The results of EDIs in mg/day are obtained multiplying the average consumption data by the Al concentration found in each food group. Otherwise, the percentages of contribution to the TWI are obtained by dividing the EDIs values by the TWI and by the average body weight, which is given by the AESAN [67], and multiplying the result by 7 to express the result per week as the TWI, and by 100 to express the result as a percentage.
Food group |
Al mean content (mg/kg)a |
Children(7-12 years old, 34.48 kgb) |
Adults(≥17 years old, 68.48 kgb) |
EDI (mg/day) |
% TWI |
EDI (mg/day) |
% TWI |
Beverages |
1.11 |
0.05 |
1.02 |
0.14 |
1.43 |
Eggs |
1.52 |
0.04 |
0.81 |
0.05 |
0.51 |
Fish and seafood |
11.9 |
0.75 |
15.2 |
1.12 |
11.4 |
Fruits |
6.84 |
1.45 |
29.4 |
1.78 |
18.2 |
Meat and its derivates |
5.98 |
0.92 |
18.7 |
0.99 |
10.1 |
Milk and its derivates |
3.05 |
1.31 |
26.6 |
1.07 |
10.9 |
Roots and tubers |
9.60 |
0.65 |
13.2 |
0.69 |
7.05 |
Vegetables |
16.8 |
1.60 |
32.5 |
3.18 |
32.5 |
Table 6: Estimated intake of aluminium through the diet.
aUsing the average aluminium content but removing the deviated results
bAverage weight established by the AESAN [64]
EDI: Estimated Daily Intake
TWI: Tolerable Weekly Intake
The EDIs for children follow the sequence: vegetables > fruits > milk and its derivates > meat and its derivates > fish and seafood > roots and tubers > beverages > eggs. In the case of adults, the EDIs values are sequenced as follows: vegetables > fruits > fish and seafood > milk and its derivates > meat and its derivates > roots and tubers > beverages > eggs.
The food groups with the most notable contribution to the TWI of Al are fruits (18.2% adults, 29.4% children) and vegetables (32.5% for adults and children).
Depending on the average consumption of each food group, the total dietary intake of Al can be above the TWI established by the EFSA.