Site Map
Research Article
Cafeteria Diet Associated with the Chronic Stress Does Not Alter Biochemical and Hematological Parameters in Wistar Rats
Abraão Tiago Batista Guimarães1, Wellington Alves Mizael da Silva1, Bruna de Oliveira Mendes1, Dieferson da Costa Estrela2, Adriana da Silva Santos3, Anderson Rodrigo da Silva4, José Roberto Ferreira Alves Júnior5, André Talvani6 and Guilherme Malafaia7*
1Laboratório de Pesquisas Biológicas, Instituto Federal Goiano - Câmpus Urutaí, GO, Brazil
2Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Laboratório de Pesquisas Biológicas, Instituto Federal Goiano - Câmpus Urutaí, GO, Brazil
3Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Laboratório de Patologia Geral, Instituto Federal Goiano - Câmpus Urutaí, GO, Brazil
4Departamento de Agronomia, Laboratório de Estatística Experimental, Instituto Federal Goiano - Campus Urutaí, GO, Brazil
5Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Instituto Federal Goiano - Câmpus Urutaí, GO, Brazil
6Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Laboratório de Imunobiologia da Inflamação, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto - Câmpus Morro do Cruzeiro, Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil
7Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Laboratório de Pesquisas Biológicas, Instituto Federal Goiano - Câmpus Urutaí, Universidade Federal de Goiás - Câmpus Samambaia, GO, Brazil

Objective: Assuming that obesity and chronic stress are both physiological disturbances that alter the homeostasis in mammalian, the aim of this study is to analyze the effect of both conditions on biochemical and hematological parameters in female Wistar rats.

Methods: Animals were fed with rodent standard feed or cafeteria diet and, from the eighth week, grouped in (a) standard diet (Std); (b) Std + stress; (c) cafeteria diet (Cafe) and (d) Cafe + stress. The animals of groups non-stressed control and stressed control were fed with rodent standard feed and those of groups non-stressed obese and stressed obese, besides the standard feed, were offered a cafeteria diet (variety of processed food). The following parameters were evaluated: body mass (weekly), hematological parameters (erythrogram and leukogram), glycemia, lipidogram, relative mass of adrenal gland and visceral and retroperitoneal fat.

Results: The cafeteria diet was effective in inducing obesity, while stress induced by restriction caused an increase in the relative adrenal gland mass, a recognized stress parameter. There was no alteration in the biochemical or in the hematological parameters caused by the interaction of obesity and chronic stress. However, obesity was able to induce hyperglycemia and leukocytosis driven by neutrophilia and lymphocytosis.

Conclusion: We conclude that the cafeteria diet used in this study is effective in inducing obesity in female Wistar rats, but association with chronic stress did not alter hematological and biochemical parameters.
Cafeteria diet; Chronic stress; Experimental models; Glycemia; Hematology

Obesity is a condition in which the excess of body fat can negatively affect health and diminish the longevity of individuals and has been considered an important public health indicator worldwide [1-4]. Obesity is also a precondition to the development of the most prevalent and expensive medical illness, such as type-2 diabetes, coronary artery disease, gastrointestinal problems, respiratory complications, osteoarthritis, cancer, neurodegenerative and psychiatric diseases [5].

Side by side with the obesity, the chronic stress is another health problem that affects millions of people in the world due to the dynamics and every-day rush. As discussed by Taylor & Stanton [6], chronic stress can result from a certain condition and/or life style and cause an ample range of behavioral changes. Among them, changes in eating habits are reflected by an interaction between the organism’s physiological state and environmental conditions [7,8]. Chronic stress is associated with metabolic disorders and changes in energy homeostasis [9,10], which can induce pleasant and compulsive behaviors, such as the intake of sweet and fat-rich foods, and consequently leading to and reinforcing the condition of obesity [11,12].

Obesity is considered an “extreme” linked to nutrition, whose effects can be overestimated when in association with chronic stress. Although the importance of the analysis of the joint effects of obesity and chronic stress is recognized [13-22], studies evaluating the effects of this association in biochemical and hematological parameters are still lacking. In addition, some studies involving obesity and stress have pointed to different results when males and females are evaluated [23-27]. Especially for stress, various stressor agents and protocols have been used. According to Franceschelli et al., [24], the chronic mild stress model is one of the most extensively investigated animal models of chronic stress. However, only a limited number of studies have been conducted with female rodents. In relation to obesity, although some works have been conducted using female rats [28-32], the biochemical and hematological aspects have not been the focus of these studies.

Therefore, there is a gap in knowledge when it comes to factors that can possibly be altered in situations where there is an overlap of obesity and stress effects. Thus, the objective of our study is to analyze the effects of obesity in association with chronic stress on biochemical and hematological parameters in Wistar rats. Our hypothesis is that obesity associated with chronic stress by restraint induces biochemical and hematological changes in female Wistar rats.
Animals and experimental groups
Female Wistar rats from the Universidade Federal de Goiás (Goiás, Brazil) were kept in the Laboratory for Biological Research of the Instituto Federal Goiano, Urutaí, Goiás, Brazil, at a temperature range of 22-25ºC and humidity of 55%-60%. The animals were subjected to a natural photoperiod (approximately 12:12 hours) and offered food and water ad libitum. Moreover, the animals were placed in polyethylene cages (tree rats per cage) (45 × 24 × 21 cm). Forty-five days old animals were used, corresponding to the final stage of puberty and grouped (n=12) in: (a) Standard diet (Std); (b) Std + stress; (c) Cafeteria diet (Cafe) and (d) Cafe + stress [33].

We emphasize that the diet started at forty-five days old and then subsequent manipulations were performed when the animals were young adults. The animals were maintained individually in cages and all procedures were approved by the Institutional Committee for Animal Care and Use of the Instituto Federal Goiano, Goiás, Brazil (protocol n. 003/2014) in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, 8th edition (2011). Animal handling and all experiments were carried in accordance with the International Guidelines for Animal Welfare.
Experimental design
Standard diet groups (under stress or not) were fed with rodent standard feed (Nuvilab - CR1®) (Table 1). The other groups (under stress or not) were fed with cafeteria diet, which consisted of palatable foods with expressive calorie levels. This food composition is nowadays prevalent in urban societies and associated with the pandemic of obesity. Cafe and Cafe + stress groups (in separate feeders) were offered daily using three varieties of palatable foods ad libitum (randomly selected from the foods listed in Table 2). All values were expressed by the amount (in grams) informed on the food package, besides the rodent standard feed. Both groups received the same variety of palatable food, in addition to standard diet (Figure 1). In addition, the animals of the Cafe groups received natural water; water plus sucrose (300 g/L concentration adopted from [34], and cola-type soft drink ad libitum. Liquid intake was not measured. In parallel, Std and Std + stress groups received standard diet only.

After eight weeks, Std + stress and Cafe + stress groups were subjected to a protocol of chronic stress by restriction, as proposed by Ely et al., [37]. In order to limit the animal’s movements, a plastic tube (25 cm × 7 cm) was used, with the frontal part open to allow breathing. The animals were subjected to the stressor agent for an hour in the afternoon (from 2 p.m. to 3 p.m.), for five days a week, during 50 days.

Body mass was the parameter taken as indicator of obesity and measured weekly. As proposed by Levin et al., [38], the animals considered obese were those that gained 15% or more weight than the animals that were not fed with the Cafe diet.

After the completion of the stress protocol, the animals were anaesthetized with pentobarbital 40 mg/kg via intraperitoneal for blood sampling from the brachial plexus. To assess the hematological parameters, a hemogram composed by erythrogram and leukogram was performed using an automatized ABX-Micros 60 hematology analyzer. For dosages of total proteins and fractions and lipid profile the automatized method A15 - Biosystems. Glycemia was determined using test strips (ACCU-CHECK Advantage II, Roche) coupled to a portable digital glucose meter.

For hematological and biochemical analyses, 5 mL of blood were collected from those animals fasted for at least 9 hours. The blood was separated in plastic tubes. After blood collecting, the animals were euthanized by exsanguination, and visceral and retroperitoneal fat were weighed. After the euthanasia, the relative mass of adrenal gland was weighed, as indicator of the stress parameter [21]. The mass of the adrenal gland was normalized to body weight using the following ratio: mass of the organs (g) /body weight (g).
Data analysis
For treating the body mass data obtained during the experimental period, the analysis of variance for repeated measurements (ANOVA-RM) and Tukey’s post-hoc test at 5% probability were used. The data related to biochemical and hematological parameters were subjected to the analysis of variance according to the factorial model (two-way ANOVA), considering the factors “nutrition” (standard and cafeteria diet - Factor 1) and “condition” (no stress and stress - Factor 2). For significant F values, Tukey’s test was applied at 5% probability. The residual normality was checked using Shapiro-Wilk’s test. Bartlett’s test was used to check the residual homoscedasticity. ANOVA was performed using the software ASSISTAT, version 7.7 beta (freeware).
Results and Discussion
The physical evaluation of the animals revealed that, from the fifth experimental week on, the animals fed with cafeteria diet (Cafe group) presented a significant (p<0.05) increase in body mass when compared to the animals fed with the standard diet only (Std group) (Figure 2), and this difference remained until the end of the experiment. Along and at the end of the experiment, the chronic stress condition imposed to the animals had no effect on the body mass, since no differences (p>0.05) were observed between the body masses of stressed and non-stressed animals, both from the Std and Cafe groups.

At the end of the experiment, only the factor “nutrition” (Factor 1) presented effect on the relative retroperitoneal fat (F(1,40)=71.202; p<0.001) (Figure 3A) and visceral mass (F(1,40)=32.887; p<0.001) (Figure 3B). Figure 3C shows representative images of the visceral fat visual aspect observed in the animals of the Std and Cafe groups (with or without stress). Therefore, these data indicate that the cafeteria diet effectively induced obesity in the animals.

Cafeteria diet was able to induce obesity in rodents, an important predictor for metabolic diseases, according to other studies [21,22]. The gain in body mass in those animals that consumed the cafeteria diet is related to high calorie content of the cafeteria diet [21]. However, the hypothesis that chronic stress could lead to obesity was not confirmed in our study. Bartolomucci et al., [10] have also shown that chronic stress can raise glucocorticoid levels, leading to pleasant and compulsive behaviors, as the intake of sweet and fat-rich food and to an increase in abdominal fat deposits and consequently obesity.

An attenuation of responses to stress has been observed in animals subjected to hypercaloric and high-carbohydrate diets. There are evidences that chronic stress can promote energy storage in the abdominal adipose tissue [39], but this was not observed in our study. Recently, in a similar study also performed in rats [22], we did not observe differences between the total daily food intakes (in grams) (up to eight experimental weeks), or effects of the factors obesity, stress or interaction after start of the stress protocol [22]. Possibly, the stress condition did not influence the parameters related to consumption, in relation to the nutritional detailing of diets. These results are directly related to the nutritional composition of the food offered to the animals.

Macedo [40] analyzing weight and biochemical parameters in male wistar rats fed with cafeteria diet and subjected to chronic stress did not observe the interference of the stress in body mass gain, in delta weight, in Lee index and in the adipose tissue weight.

Regarding the adrenal glands, according to Macedo [40], under chronic stress conditions there is continuous stimulation of the adrenal by adrenocorticotropic hormone leading to hypertrophy of these glands. Here, we used the weight of adrenal as indirect stress parameter showing that the animals were stressed. The effect of factor 2 “condition” (stress exposure) was observed on relative adrenal gland mass (F(1,44) = 6.681, p = 0.032), with increased adrenal weights in stressed animals compared with non-stressed rats. (Figure 4). This result corroborates with previous studies, showing that exposure to daily restraint stress can cause adrenal gland hypertrophy [41-43].

In relation to the erythrogram, there was no interaction between the factors “nutrition” and “condition” independently of the parameters analyzed (Table 3). Besides, the animals did not present values indicative of an anemic condition, defined by hematocrits, hemoglobin concentration and globular volume. The mean corpuscular volume and the mean cell hemoglobin concentration are parameters used to morphologically assess anemia types [44]. Since animals from this study did not present anemia, no significant changes were observed in these variables.

Regarding the lipidogram, no interactions between the factors “nutrition” (Factor 1) and “condition” (Factor 2) were observed for the analyzed parameters, or even individual effects of these factors (Table 3). These results were expected, once the diets offered to the animals were not hyperlipidemic. Hoefel et al., [45], studying Wistar rats, suggested a positive correlation between the consumption of hyperlipidemic diets with metabolic changes. These authors showed that the hyperlipidemic diet with saturated fat, when consumed ad libitum, causes negative effects on both the plasma and the hepatic lipid profiles.

Regarding the leukogram, no interactions (p>0.05) between the factors “nutrition” and “condition” were observed for the evaluated parameters. Only the effect of the factor “nutrition” (Factor 1) was observed (Table 4), once the obese animals (subjected or not to stress) presented higher concentrations of total leukocytes (Cafe: 20550.00/mm3; Std: 6675.00/mm3), segmented neutrophils (Cafe: 6507.58/mm3; Std: 615.75/mm3), total neutrophils (Cafe: 6538.16/mm3; Std: 631.50/mm3) and lymphocytes (Cafe: 11363.50/mm3; Std: 5447.41/mm3) (Figure 5).

Our data suggest to neutrophilia and lymphocytosis in the obese animals evidenced changes in the immunological processes. The increased lymphocyte and neutrophil concentrations are evidences of changes in the immunological system of the obese animals, which can be related to the molecule secretion by adipocytes. According to Fain et al., [46] and Wajchenberg [47], adipocytes secrete leptin in concentrations directly proportional to the adipose tissue mass and to nutritional condition of the organism. Considine et al., [48] point to the fact that the adipose mass is one of the factors strongly associated with Lp concentrations in blood. Thus, the high Lp production by adipocytes drives a higher pro-inflammatory cytokines secretion by monocytes and, consequently, an increase of T lymphocytes. Evidences in vitro and in animals suggest that leptin plays an important role in the regulation of the humoral inflammatory response by means of the direct effects in T lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils and endothelial cells [49]. Thus, the increase in body mass might leads an increase of the soluble leptin and, consequently, to the increase in the plasmatic levels of inflammatory markers associated with obesity [50], which would characterize a pro-inflammatory state capable to induce leukocytosis, as observed in the animals fed with cafeteria diet.

Another hypothesis that could explain leukocytosis is related to the epinephrine secreted by the adrenal medulla in chronic stress situations, as demonstrated by Mersmann [51]. According to Thrall et al., [52], the effect of epinephrine on the leukogram can be expressed as the increase in the total leukocyte count, particularly in neutrophils and/or lymphocytes, as observed in our study.

The statistical analysis also revealed the absence of interactions between the factors “nutrition” and “condition” occurred with total proteins, albumin and globulin (Table 5). Only the effect of the factor “nutrition” was observed in glucose levels, whereas the obese animals (subjected or not to chronic stress) presented a glucose concentration of 146.91 g/dL in comparison to 119.83 g/dL from standard diet animals fed.

Rosmond [53] states that obesity is commonly associated with a range of metabolic diseases, which can influence the secretion of different substances by the adipocytes. These substances act in complex ways that are still being studied. According to Campos et al., [54], these substances can cause morpho-functional changes in the adipocytes, which secrete higher TNF-α and interleukin 6 concentrations in obese organisms, which are antagonist to insulin. In this case, this antagonist action could explain the hyperglycemia observed in the obese animals of our study, although we did not investigate the parameters linked to insulin.
We conclude that the cafeteria diet used in this study is effective in inducing obesity in female Wistar rats, but association with chronic stress did not alter hematological and biochemical parameters. The type of chronic stress protocol used, the age and sex of the animals used in our study constitute important factors that could have contributed to the absence of the joint effects caused by the two diseases (obesity and stress). On the other hand, it is important to have in mind the possibility of development of an adaptive process resultant from the repeated exposition to stress, which would lead to a metabolic tolerance that would prevent or minimize the damaging effects to the organism.

  1. [No authors listed] (2006) Curbing the obesity epidemic. Lancet 367: 1549.
  2. Flegal KM, Kit BK, Orpana H, Graubard BI (2013) Association of all-cause mortality with overweight and obesity using standard body mass index categories: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 309: 71-82.
  3. Dulloo AG, Jacquet J, Solinas G, Montani JP, Schutz Y (2010) Body composition phenotypes in pathways to obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Int J Obes (Lond) 34: 4-17.
  4. World Health Organization (WHO) (2014) Obesity and overweight. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  5. Haslam DW, James WP (2005) Obesity. Lancet 366: 1197-1209.
  6. Taylor SE, Stanton AL (2007) Coping resources, coping processes, and mental health. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 3: 377-401.
  7. Vilela JE, Lamounier JA, Dellaretti Filho MA, Barros Neto JR, Horta GM (2004) [Eating disorders in school children]. J Pediatr (Rio J) 80: 49-54.
  8. Silva JR (2011) Restraint eating and sensitivity to stress: preliminary experimental evidence. Riv Psichiatr 46: 300-304.
  9. Tamashiro KL, Sakai RR, Shively CA, Karatsoreos IN, Reagan LP (2011) Chronic stress, metabolism, and metabolic syndrome. Stress 14: 468-474.
  10. Bartolomucci A, Cabassi A, Govoni P, Ceresini G, Cero C, et al. (2009) Metabolic consequences and vulnerability to diet-induced obesity in male mice under chronic social stress. PLoS One 4: e4331.
  11. Gluck ME, Geliebter A, Satov T (2001) Night eating syndrome is associated with depression, low self-esteem, reduced daytime hunger, and less weight loss in obese outpatients. Obes Res 9: 264-267.
  12. Björntorp P (2001) Do stress reactions cause abdominal obesity and comorbidities? Obes Rev 2: 73-86.
  13. Dallman MF, Pecoraro NC, la Fleur SE (2005) Chronic stress and comfort foods: self-medication and abdominal obesity. Brain Behav Immun 19: 275-280.
  14. Dallman MF, Pecoraro NC, La Fleur SE, Warne JP, Ginsberg AB, et al. (2006) Glucocorticoids, chronic stress, and obesity. Prog Brain Res 153: 75-105.
  15. Warne JP, Dallman MF (2007) Stress, diet and abdominal obesity: Y? Nat Med 13: 781-783.
  16. Dallman MF (2010) Stress-induced obesity and the emotional nervous system. Trends Endocrinol Metab 21: 159-165.
  17. Tomiyama AJ, Dallman MF, Epel ES (2011) Comfort food is comforting to those most stressed: evidence of the chronic stress response network in high stress women. Psychoneuroendocrinology 36: 1513-1519.
  18. Macedo IC, Medeiros LF, Oliveira C, Oliveira CM, Rozisky JR, et al. (2012) Cafeteria diet-induced obesity plus chronic stress alter serum leptin levels. Peptides 38: 189-196.
  19. de Oliveira C, Scarabelot VL, de Souza A, de Oliveira CM, Medeiros LF, et al. (2014) Obesity and chronic stress are able to desynchronize the temporal pattern of serum levels of leptin and triglycerides. Peptides 51: 46-53.
  20. Macedo IC, Rozisky JR, Battastini AMO, Ribeiro MFM, Torres ILS (2014). Obesity and Chronic Stress Modulate Adenine Nucleotide Hydrolysis in Rat Blood Serum. International Journal of Pharmaceutics Research Scholars 3: 28-40.
  21. Macedo IC, Rozisky JR, Oliveira C, Oliveira CM, Laste G, et al. (2015) Chronic stress associated with hypercaloric diet changes the hippocampal BDNF levels in male Wistar rats. Neuropeptides 51: 75-81.
  22. da Costa Estrela D, da Silva WA, Guimarães AT, de Oliveira Mendes B, da Silva Castro AL, et al. (2015) Predictive behaviors for anxiety and depression in female Wistar rats subjected to cafeteria diet and stress. Physiol Behav 151: 252-263.
  23. Asarian L, Geary N (2013) Sex differences in the physiology of eating. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 305: R1215-1267.
  24. Franceschelli A, Herchick S, Thelen C, Papadopoulou-Daifoti Z, Pitychoutis PM (2014) Sex differences in the chronic mild stress model of depression. Behav Pharmacol 25: 372-383.
  25. Balog M, Miljanović M, Blažetić S, Labak I, Ivić V, et al. (2015). Sex-specific chronic stress response at the level of adrenal gland modified sexual hormone and leptin receptors. Croat Med J 56: 104-112.
  26. Lu J, Wu XY, Zhu QB, Li J, Shi LG, et al. (2015) Sex differences in the stress response in SD rats. Behav Brain Res 284: 231-237.
  27. Keller SM, Schreiber WB, Staib JM, Knox D (2015) Sex differences in the single prolonged stress model. Behav Brain Res 286: 29-32.
  28. Pratchayasakul W, Sa-Nguanmoo P, Sivasinprasasn S, Pintana H, Tawinvisan R, et al. (2015) Obesity accelerates cognitive decline by aggravating mitochondrial dysfunction, insulin resistance and synaptic dysfunction under estrogen-deprived conditions. Horm Behav 72: 68-77.
  29. Gurecká R, Koborová I, Janšáková K, Tábi T, Szökő É, et al. (2015). Prenatal dietary load of Maillard reaction products combined with postnatal Coca-Cola drinking affects metabolic status of female Wistar rats. Croat Med J 56: 94-103.
  30. Sivasinprasasn S, Sa-Nguanmoo P, Pratchayasakul W, Kumfu S, Chattipakorn SC, et al. (2015) Obese-insulin resistance accelerates and aggravates cardiometabolic disorders and cardiac mitochondrial dysfunction in estrogen-deprived female rats. Age (Dordr) 37: 28.
  31. Sivanathan S, Thavartnam K, Arif S, Elegino T, McGowan PO (2015) Chronic high fat feeding increases anxiety-like behaviour and reduces transcript abundance of glucocorticoid signalling genes in the hippocampus of female rats. Behav Brain Res 286: 267-270.
  32. Colman JB, Laureano DP, Reis TM, Krolow R, Dalmaz C, et al. (2015) Variations in the neonatal environment modulate adult behavioral and brain responses to palatable food withdrawal in adult female rats. Int J Dev Neurosci 40: 70-75.
  33. Andrade A, Pinto SC, Oliveira RS (2002) Animais de laboratório-criação e experimentação. FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  34. Malafaia AB, Nassif PA, Ribas CA, Ariede BL, Sue KN, et al. (2013) Obesity induction with high fat sucrose in rats. Arq Bras Cir Dig 26: 17-21.
  35. Nutrição Animal Em Barretos (2010) Nuvital: Segurança em Nutrição Animal. Animal Nutrition In Barretos, Brazil.
  36. Reeves PG, Nielsen FH, Fahey-Junior GC (1993) AIN-93 purified diets for laboratory rodents: final report of the American Institute of Nutrition ad hoc writing committee on the reformulation of the AIN-76A rodent diet. J Nutr 123: 1939-1951.
  37. Ely DR, Dapper V, Marasca J, Corrêa JB, Gamaro GD, et al. (1997) Effect of restraint stress on feeding behavior of rats. Physiol Behav 61: 395-398.
  38. Levin BE, Triscari J, Sullivan AC (1986) Metabolic features of diet-induced obesity without hyperphagia in young rats. Am J Physiol 251: 433-440.
  39. Dallman MF, la Fleur SE, Pecoraro NC, Gomez F, Houshyar H, et al. (2004) Minireview: glucocorticoids--food intake, abdominal obesity, and wealthy nations in 2004. Endocrinology 145: 2633-2638.
  40. Macedo IC (2010) Estresse crônico associado à dieta hipercalórica em ratos Wistar: parâmetros ponderais e bioquímicos. Dissertação (Mestrado em Fisiologia), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul,
  41. Wellman CL (2001) Dendritic reorganization in pyramidal neurons in medial prefrontal cortex after chronic corticosterone administration. J Neurobiol 49: 245-253.
  42. Magariños AM, McEwen BS (1995) Stress-induced atrophy of apical dendrites of hippocampal CA3c neurons: involvement of glucocorticoid secretion and excitatory amino acid receptors. Neuroscience 69: 89-98.
  43. Bloss EB, Janssen WG, McEwen BS, Morrison JH (2010) Interactive effects of stress and aging on structural plasticity in the prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci 30: 6726-6731.
  44. Lopes STA, Biondo AW, Santos AP (2007) Manual de Patologia Clínica Veterinária. (3rd edn), UFSM, Santa Maria, Brazil.
  45. Hoefel AL, Hansen F, Rosa PD, Assis AM, Silveira SL, et al. (2011) The effects of hypercaloric diets on glucose homeostasis in the rat: influence of saturated and monounsaturated dietary lipids. Cell Biochem Funct 29: 569-576.
  46. Fain JN, Madan AK, Hiler ML, Cheema P, Bahouth SW (2004) Comparison of the release of adipokines by adipose tissue, adipose tissue matrix, and adipocytes from visceral and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissues of obese humans. Endocrinology 145: 2273-2282.
  47. Wajchenberg BL (2000) Subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue: their relation to the metabolic syndrome. Endocr Rev 21: 697-738.
  48. Considine RV, Sinha MK, Heiman ML, Kriauciunas A, Stephens TW, et al. (1996) Serum immunoreactive-leptin concentrations in normal-weight and obese humans. N Engl J Med 334: 292-295.
  49. Hukshorn CJ, Lindeman JH, Toet KH, Saris WH, Eilers PH, et al. (2004) Leptin and the proinflammatory state associated with human obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89: 1773-1778.
  50. Ziccardi P, Nappo F, Giugliano G, Esposito K, Marfella R, et al. (2002) Reduction of inflammatory cytokine concentrations and improvement of endothelial functions in obese women after weight loss over one year. Circulation 105: 804-809.
  51. Mersmann HJ (1989) Acute changes in blood flow in pigs infused with beta-adrenergic agonists. J Anim Sci 67: 2913-2920.
  52. Thrall MA, Weiser G, Allisson RW, Campbell TW (2012) Veterinary hematology and clinical chemistry. (2nd edn), Wiley-Blackwell, New Jersey, USA.
  53. Rosmond R (2004) Aetiology of obesity: a striving after wind? Obes Rev 5: 177-181.
  54. Campos KE, Sinzato YK, Damasceno DC, Rudge MVC (2006). Obesity and insulin resistance. Femina 34:592-595.


Figure 1: Schedule prepared for the experiment carried out with Wistar rats subjected to standard and cafeteria diets, and subjected or not to chronic stress by restriction.

Figure 2: Weekly body mass of Wistar rats subjected to standard and cafeteria diets, exposed or not to chronic stress by restriction.

Figure 3: A) Retroperitoneal fat mass.B) Visceral fat mass of Wistar rats subjected to standard and cafeteria diets, exposed or not to chronic stress by restriction.C) Representative images of the visual aspect of visceral fat of animals at the end of the experiment-standard diet (with or without stress) and cafeteria diet (with or without stress).
Bars indicate means + standard deviation of the data from two experiments (n=12), carried out independently. Comparison between Std and Cafe groups by two-way ANOVA of the factor 1, at 5% probability. Distinct lowercase letters indicate statistically significant differences between the experimental groups, according to the Tukey’s test. Std: standard diet group; Cafe: cafeteria diet group.

Figure 4: Relative adrenal gland mass (g) of female Wistar rats of the non-stressed and stressed groups (n=24 per group). Different letters indicate statistical differences (p<0.05) between different groups.

Figure 5: Serum concentrations of total leukocytes, segmented neutrophils, total neutrophils and lymphocytes, performed in Wistar rats subjected to standard and cafeteria diets, exposed or not to chronic stress by restriction.
Data expressed as mean ± standard deviation concerning the two experiments (n = 12), carried out independently. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (p<0.05) between the groups and the standard diet and cafeteria. Legend of the groups: standard diet (St) and cafeteria diet (Cafe).

Ingredients of the standard feed(1)
Ground whole corn, Soybean bran, Wheat bran, Calcium carbonate, Dicalcium phosphate, Sodium chloride, Mixture of vitamins, Minerals and Amino acids.
Specifications(1) Warranty levels per kg of the product (g/kg)(1)
Moisture 125
Casein(2) 220
Ether extract 40
Mixture of salts 90
Fibrous matter 70
Calcium 10
Phosphorus 8
Kcal 2930
Enrichment per kg of the product(3)

Vitamins: Vitamin A 13.000 UI; Vitamin D3 2.000 UI; Vitamin E 34 UI; Vitamin K3 3 mg; Vitamin B1 5 mg; Vitamin B2 6 mg; Vitamin B6 7 mg; Vitamin B12 22 µg; Niacin 60 mg; Calcium pantothenate 20 mg; Folic acid 1 mg; Biotin 0.05 mg; Choline 1900 mg.

Minerals: Zinc 60 mg; Copper 10 mg; Iodine 2 mg; Selenium 0.05 mg; Cobalt 1.5 mg; Fluorine 80 mg. Amino acids: Lysine 12 g; Methionine 4,000 mg.

Additives: BHT 100 mg.

Table 1: Nutritional information from the rodent standard feed (Nuvilab - CR1).

Processed foods and portion (in grams) as regards their nutritional composition Kcal per portion Carbohydrates (g) Protein (g) Total lipids (g)
1. Bacon Krik (São João Sabor e Nutrição®) (30 g portion) 120 19.8 1.8 3.6
2. White chocolate bonbon (Nestle® Brazil) (20g portion) 93 14 0.7 3.6
3. Honey bread (Quero Quero) (30 g portion) 123 28 1.6 0.4
4. Salame (Friato®) (50 g portion) 112 2.5 6 8
5. Lemon wafer cookies (Parmalat®) (30 g portion) 165 19 1.1 9.5
6. Corn flakes (Skiny®) (25 g portion) 127 20 1.8 4.2
7. Coated peanuts (Dori®) (25 g portion) 109 20.8 1.8 2.4
8. Vanilla mini-cake (Bauducco®) (40 g portion) 164 20 2.2 8.4
9. Homemade dulce de leche (Parati®) (30 g portion) 70 17 1 12
10. Mini bread rolls (Pullman®) ( 50 g portion) 154 28 3.9 2.8
11. Sandwich biscuits of sweet brigadier (Mabel®) (30 g portion) 147 21 1.7 6.9
12. Toasted popcorn (São João®) (40 g portion) 64.4 12.4 2.1 7.5
13. Cookies (Bauducco®) (30 g portion) 151 19 2.1 7.5
14. Maisena biscuit (Parmalat®) (30 g portion) 132 22 2.4 3.7
15. Tapioca flour biscuit (Peta Caseira) (25 g portion) 117 23.17 0.9 0.93
16. Pizza flavored biscuit (Miliopã®) (30 g portion) 128 22 2 3.5
17. Caramel-filled bonbon (Nestlé®) (20 g portion) 92 15 0.6 3.3
18. Strawberry sandwich biscuit (Amanda®) (30 g portion) 125 16 1 4
19. Cheese flavored chips (Miliopã®) (30 g portion) 130 22 2.2 3.8
20. Provolone cheese (Vale Orizona®) (30 g portion) 103 0 8.7 76
21. Hot dog sausage (Sadia®) (50 g portion) 121 33.7 6.8 9.5
22. Paio sausage (Sadia®) (50 g portion) 187 0 8.5 17
23. Bacon flavored chip (Miliopã®) (25 g portion) 105 18 1.8 2.5
24. Mini chocolate cake (Bauducco®) (40 g portion) 164 20 2.2 8.4
25. Prestígio bonbon (Nestlé®) (18.4 g portion) 85 11 0 3.8
26. Mortadella (Friato®) (50 g portion) 112 2.5 6 8
27. Smoked Calabrian sausage (Sadia®) (50 g portion) 182 0.8 8.7 16
28. Lemon wafer cookies (Amanda®) (30 g portion) 125 16 1 4
29. Sugar peanut (Dori®) (15 g portion) 73 8.9 1.8 3.4
30. Cream biscuits (Maranata®) (30 g portion) 190 20 2 5
31. Chocolate donut (Mabel®) (30 g portion) 125 22 1.8 3.5
32. Carrot cake (Ana Maria®) (40 g portion) 159 23 2 5.6
33. Ready crackling (Sabor D’Abadia®) (10 g portion) 68 0 2.6 6.2
34. Sweet brigadier (Bauducco®) (30 g portion) 133 18 1.7 6
35. Baconzitos-bacon chips (Elma Chips®) (25 g portion) 126 15 1.9 6.7
36. Cashew (Dunorte®) (15 g portion) 88 3.4 3 6.9
37. Chicken sausage (Perdigão®) (50 g portion) 106 2 6 8.2
38. Mortadella (Sadilar®) (40 g portion) 121 3.4 4 10
39. Gomets (Dori®) (20 g portion) 72 18 0 0
40. Mini strawberry cake (Bauducco®) (40 g portion) 146 20 2.2 6.4
41. Baked cheese chips (Cheetos®) (20 g portion) 100 11 0.9 4.4
42. Wavy potato chip (Crony®) (25 g portion) 153 1.4 1.7 10
43. Ham (Sadia®) (30 g portion) 36 0.8 3.9 1.9
44. Sweet corn flakes (Ki gostoso®) (25 g portion) 69 16 1.3 0
45. Peanuts (Paulista®) (15 g portion) 90 13.7 1.3 0
46. Bis-chocolate wafer (Lacta®) (30 g portion) 149 19 1.8 7.1
47. Passatempo-strawberry filled sandwich biscuit (Nestlé®) (30 g portion) 135 21 1.9 4.8
48. Fandangos (Elma Chips®) (22 g portion) 100 16 1.5 3.5
49. Teens Bauny-rolls (Marilam®) (30 g portion) 134 20 2.4 4.8
Table 2: Foods offered to the animals of the Cafe groups during the experimental period, with nutritional information.
  Factor 1 (“nutrition”) Factor 2 (“condition”) Interaction (F1 x F2)
E (tera/L) F(1,44) = 4.176, p = 0.054 F(1,44) = 0.264, p = 0.612 F(1,44) = 0.773, p = 0.389
Hem (%) F(1,44) = 2.951, p = 0.101 F(1,44) = 0.270, p = 0.608 F(1,44) = 0.258, p = 0.616
Hb (g/dL) F(1,44) = 1.192, p = 0.287 F(1,44) = 0.838, p = 0.370 F(1,44) = 0.358, p = 0.555
MCV (fL) F(1,44) = 0.721, p = 0.405 F(1,44) = 0.090, p = 0.767 F(1,44) = 1.701, p = 0.206
MCHC (g/dL) F(1,44) = 1.975, p = 0.175 F(1,44) = 0.160, p = 0.693 F(1,44) = 0.005, p = 0.943
Cholesterol (mg/dL) F(1,44) = 1.546, p = 0.227 F(1,44) = 0.608, p = 0.444 F(1,44) = 0.999, p = 0.329
Triglycerides (mg/dL) F(1,44) = 1.116, p = 0.303 F(1,44) = 0.701, p = 0.411 F(1,44) = 0.217, p = 0.645
HDL (mg/dL) F(1,44) = 0.019, p = 0.890 F(1,44) = 0.008, p = 0.977 F(1,44) = 2.034, p = 0.169
LDL (mg/dL) F(1,44) = 2.971, p = 0.100 F(1,44) = 1.516, p = 0.232 F(1,44) = 0.379, p = 0.544
VLDL (mg/dL) F(1,44) = 1.116, p = 0.303 F(1,44) = 0.701, p = 0.411 F(1,44) = 0.217, p = 0.645
Table 3: Summary of the ANOVA F test for parameters of the erythrogram and lipidogram in Wistar rats subjected to standard and cafeteria diets, exposed or not to chronic stress by restriction.
E: erythrocyte; Hem: hematocrit; Hb: hemoglobin; MCH: mean corpuscular volume; MCHC: mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; VLDL: very low-density lipoprotein.
  Factor 1 (“nutrition”) Factor 2 (“condition”) Interaction (F1 x F2)
Total leukocytes (/mm3) F(1,44) = 5.554, p = 0.028* F(1,44) = 1.191, p = 0.666 F(1,44) = 0.539, p = 0.470
Segmented neutrophils (/mm3) F(1,44) = 4.539, p = 0.045* F(1,44) = 0.181, p = 0.674 F(1,44) = 0.248, p = 0.623
Total neutrophils (/mm3) F(1,44) = 4.579, p = 0.049* F(1,44) = 0.172, p = 0.682 F(1,44) = 0.249, p = 0.622
Total lymphocytes (/mm3) F(1,44) = 6.652, p = 0.017* F(1,44) = 0.168, p = 0.685 F(1,44) = 1.052, p = 0.317
Table 4: Summary of the ANOVA F test for parameters of the leukogram in Wistar rats subjected to standard and cafeteria diets, exposed or not to chronic stress by restriction
Asterisk indicates the effect of the factor 1 on the parameters analyzed, at 5% probability by two-way ANOVA.

Factor 1(“nutrition”)

Factor 2 (“condition”) Interaction F1 x F2
Total proteins (g/dL) F(1,44) = 0.221, p = 0.642 F(1,44) = 0.252, p = 0,620 F(1,44) = 0.084, p = 0,740
Albumin (g/dL) F(1,44) = 1.650, p = 0.213 F(1,44) = 0.015, p = 0,901 F(1,44) = 0.184, p = 0,671
Globulin (g/dL) F(1,44) = 2.391, p = 0.137 F(1,44) = 0.248, p = 0,623 F(1,44) = 0.187, p = 0,669
Glycemia (g/dL) F(1,44) = 7.265, p = 0.013* F(1,44) = 0.327, p = 0,573 F(1,44) = 0.019, p = 0,883
Table 5: Summary of the ANOVA F test for biochemical parameters of Wistar rats subjected to standard and cafeteria diets, exposed or not to chronic stress by restriction.
Asterisk indicates the effect of the factor 1 on the parameters analyzed, at 5% probability by two-way ANOVA.

Citation: Guimarães ATB, Silva WAMD, Mendes BDO, Estrela DDC, Santos ADS, et al. (2016) Cafeteria Diet Associated with the Chronic Stress Does Not Alter Biochemical and Hematological Parameters in Wistar Rats. J Obes Weight Loss 2: 006.