Objective: Assuming that obesity and chronic stress are both physiological disturbances that alter the homeostasis in mammalian, the aim of this study is to analyze the effect of both conditions on biochemical and hematological parameters in female Wistar rats.
Methods: Animals were fed with rodent standard feed or cafeteria diet and, from the eighth week, grouped in (a) standard diet (Std); (b) Std + stress; (c) cafeteria diet (Cafe) and (d) Cafe + stress. The animals of groups non-stressed control and stressed control were fed with rodent standard feed and those of groups non-stressed obese and stressed obese, besides the standard feed, were offered a cafeteria diet (variety of processed food). The following parameters were evaluated: body mass (weekly), hematological parameters (erythrogram and leukogram), glycemia, lipidogram, relative mass of adrenal gland and visceral and retroperitoneal fat.
Results: The cafeteria diet was effective in inducing obesity, while stress induced by restriction caused an increase in the relative adrenal gland mass, a recognized stress parameter. There was no alteration in the biochemical or in the hematological parameters caused by the interaction of obesity and chronic stress. However, obesity was able to induce hyperglycemia and leukocytosis driven by neutrophilia and lymphocytosis.
Conclusion: We conclude that the cafeteria diet used in this study is effective in inducing obesity in female Wistar rats, but association with chronic stress did not alter hematological and biochemical parameters.
Cafeteria diet; Chronic stress; Experimental models; Glycemia; Hematology
Obesity is a condition in which the excess of body fat can negatively affect health and diminish the longevity of individuals and has been considered an important public health indicator worldwide [1-4]. Obesity is also a precondition to the development of the most prevalent and expensive medical illness, such as type-2 diabetes, coronary artery disease, gastrointestinal problems, respiratory complications, osteoarthritis, cancer, neurodegenerative and psychiatric diseases .
Side by side with the obesity, the chronic stress is another health problem that affects millions of people in the world due to the dynamics and every-day rush. As discussed by Taylor & Stanton , chronic stress can result from a certain condition and/or life style and cause an ample range of behavioral changes. Among them, changes in eating habits are reflected by an interaction between the organism’s physiological state and environmental conditions [7,8]. Chronic stress is associated with metabolic disorders and changes in energy homeostasis [9,10], which can induce pleasant and compulsive behaviors, such as the intake of sweet and fat-rich foods, and consequently leading to and reinforcing the condition of obesity [11,12].
Obesity is considered an “extreme” linked to nutrition, whose effects can be overestimated when in association with chronic stress. Although the importance of the analysis of the joint effects of obesity and chronic stress is recognized [13-22], studies evaluating the effects of this association in biochemical and hematological parameters are still lacking. In addition, some studies involving obesity and stress have pointed to different results when males and females are evaluated [23-27]. Especially for stress, various stressor agents and protocols have been used. According to Franceschelli et al., , the chronic mild stress model is one of the most extensively investigated animal models of chronic stress. However, only a limited number of studies have been conducted with female rodents. In relation to obesity, although some works have been conducted using female rats [28-32], the biochemical and hematological aspects have not been the focus of these studies.
Therefore, there is a gap in knowledge when it comes to factors that can possibly be altered in situations where there is an overlap of obesity and stress effects. Thus, the objective of our study is to analyze the effects of obesity in association with chronic stress on biochemical and hematological parameters in Wistar rats. Our hypothesis is that obesity associated with chronic stress by restraint induces biochemical and hematological changes in female Wistar rats.
Animals and experimental groups
Female Wistar rats from the Universidade Federal de Goiás (Goiás, Brazil) were kept in the Laboratory for Biological Research of the Instituto Federal Goiano, Urutaí, Goiás, Brazil, at a temperature range of 22-25ºC and humidity of 55%-60%. The animals were subjected to a natural photoperiod (approximately 12:12 hours) and offered food and water ad libitum. Moreover, the animals were placed in polyethylene cages (tree rats per cage) (45 × 24 × 21 cm). Forty-five days old animals were used, corresponding to the final stage of puberty and grouped (n=12) in: (a) Standard diet (Std); (b) Std + stress; (c) Cafeteria diet (Cafe) and (d) Cafe + stress .
We emphasize that the diet started at forty-five days old and then subsequent manipulations were performed when the animals were young adults. The animals were maintained individually in cages and all procedures were approved by the Institutional Committee for Animal Care and Use of the Instituto Federal Goiano, Goiás, Brazil (protocol n. 003/2014) in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, 8th edition (2011). Animal handling and all experiments were carried in accordance with the International Guidelines for Animal Welfare.
Standard diet groups (under stress or not) were fed with rodent standard feed (Nuvilab - CR1®) (Table 1). The other groups (under stress or not) were fed with cafeteria diet, which consisted of palatable foods with expressive calorie levels. This food composition is nowadays prevalent in urban societies and associated with the pandemic of obesity. Cafe and Cafe + stress groups (in separate feeders) were offered daily using three varieties of palatable foods ad libitum (randomly selected from the foods listed in Table 2). All values were expressed by the amount (in grams) informed on the food package, besides the rodent standard feed. Both groups received the same variety of palatable food, in addition to standard diet (Figure 1). In addition, the animals of the Cafe groups received natural water; water plus sucrose (300 g/L concentration adopted from , and cola-type soft drink ad libitum. Liquid intake was not measured. In parallel, Std and Std + stress groups received standard diet only.
After eight weeks, Std + stress and Cafe + stress groups were subjected to a protocol of chronic stress by restriction, as proposed by Ely et al., . In order to limit the animal’s movements, a plastic tube (25 cm × 7 cm) was used, with the frontal part open to allow breathing. The animals were subjected to the stressor agent for an hour in the afternoon (from 2 p.m. to 3 p.m.), for five days a week, during 50 days.
Body mass was the parameter taken as indicator of obesity and measured weekly. As proposed by Levin et al., , the animals considered obese were those that gained 15% or more weight than the animals that were not fed with the Cafe diet.
After the completion of the stress protocol, the animals were anaesthetized with pentobarbital 40 mg/kg via intraperitoneal for blood sampling from the brachial plexus. To assess the hematological parameters, a hemogram composed by erythrogram and leukogram was performed using an automatized ABX-Micros 60 hematology analyzer. For dosages of total proteins and fractions and lipid profile the automatized method A15 - Biosystems. Glycemia was determined using test strips (ACCU-CHECK Advantage II, Roche) coupled to a portable digital glucose meter.
For hematological and biochemical analyses, 5 mL of blood were collected from those animals fasted for at least 9 hours. The blood was separated in plastic tubes. After blood collecting, the animals were euthanized by exsanguination, and visceral and retroperitoneal fat were weighed. After the euthanasia, the relative mass of adrenal gland was weighed, as indicator of the stress parameter . The mass of the adrenal gland was normalized to body weight using the following ratio: mass of the organs (g) /body weight (g).
For treating the body mass data obtained during the experimental period, the analysis of variance for repeated measurements (ANOVA-RM) and Tukey’s post-hoc test at 5% probability were used. The data related to biochemical and hematological parameters were subjected to the analysis of variance according to the factorial model (two-way ANOVA), considering the factors “nutrition” (standard and cafeteria diet - Factor 1) and “condition” (no stress and stress - Factor 2). For significant F values, Tukey’s test was applied at 5% probability. The residual normality was checked using Shapiro-Wilk’s test. Bartlett’s test was used to check the residual homoscedasticity. ANOVA was performed using the software ASSISTAT, version 7.7 beta (freeware).
Results and Discussion
The physical evaluation of the animals revealed that, from the fifth experimental week on, the animals fed with cafeteria diet (Cafe group) presented a significant (p<0.05) increase in body mass when compared to the animals fed with the standard diet only (Std group) (Figure 2), and this difference remained until the end of the experiment. Along and at the end of the experiment, the chronic stress condition imposed to the animals had no effect on the body mass, since no differences (p>0.05) were observed between the body masses of stressed and non-stressed animals, both from the Std and Cafe groups.
At the end of the experiment, only the factor “nutrition” (Factor 1) presented effect on the relative retroperitoneal fat (F(1,40)=71.202; p<0.001) (Figure 3A) and visceral mass (F(1,40)=32.887; p<0.001) (Figure 3B). Figure 3C shows representative images of the visceral fat visual aspect observed in the animals of the Std and Cafe groups (with or without stress). Therefore, these data indicate that the cafeteria diet effectively induced obesity in the animals.
Cafeteria diet was able to induce obesity in rodents, an important predictor for metabolic diseases, according to other studies [21,22]. The gain in body mass in those animals that consumed the cafeteria diet is related to high calorie content of the cafeteria diet . However, the hypothesis that chronic stress could lead to obesity was not confirmed in our study. Bartolomucci et al.,  have also shown that chronic stress can raise glucocorticoid levels, leading to pleasant and compulsive behaviors, as the intake of sweet and fat-rich food and to an increase in abdominal fat deposits and consequently obesity.
An attenuation of responses to stress has been observed in animals subjected to hypercaloric and high-carbohydrate diets. There are evidences that chronic stress can promote energy storage in the abdominal adipose tissue , but this was not observed in our study. Recently, in a similar study also performed in rats , we did not observe differences between the total daily food intakes (in grams) (up to eight experimental weeks), or effects of the factors obesity, stress or interaction after start of the stress protocol . Possibly, the stress condition did not influence the parameters related to consumption, in relation to the nutritional detailing of diets. These results are directly related to the nutritional composition of the food offered to the animals.
Macedo  analyzing weight and biochemical parameters in male wistar rats fed with cafeteria diet and subjected to chronic stress did not observe the interference of the stress in body mass gain, in delta weight, in Lee index and in the adipose tissue weight.
Regarding the adrenal glands, according to Macedo , under chronic stress conditions there is continuous stimulation of the adrenal by adrenocorticotropic hormone leading to hypertrophy of these glands. Here, we used the weight of adrenal as indirect stress parameter showing that the animals were stressed. The effect of factor 2 “condition” (stress exposure) was observed on relative adrenal gland mass (F(1,44) = 6.681, p = 0.032), with increased adrenal weights in stressed animals compared with non-stressed rats. (Figure 4). This result corroborates with previous studies, showing that exposure to daily restraint stress can cause adrenal gland hypertrophy [41-43].
In relation to the erythrogram, there was no interaction between the factors “nutrition” and “condition” independently of the parameters analyzed (Table 3). Besides, the animals did not present values indicative of an anemic condition, defined by hematocrits, hemoglobin concentration and globular volume. The mean corpuscular volume and the mean cell hemoglobin concentration are parameters used to morphologically assess anemia types . Since animals from this study did not present anemia, no significant changes were observed in these variables.
Regarding the lipidogram, no interactions between the factors “nutrition” (Factor 1) and “condition” (Factor 2) were observed for the analyzed parameters, or even individual effects of these factors (Table 3). These results were expected, once the diets offered to the animals were not hyperlipidemic. Hoefel et al., , studying Wistar rats, suggested a positive correlation between the consumption of hyperlipidemic diets with metabolic changes. These authors showed that the hyperlipidemic diet with saturated fat, when consumed ad libitum, causes negative effects on both the plasma and the hepatic lipid profiles.
Regarding the leukogram, no interactions (p>0.05) between the factors “nutrition” and “condition” were observed for the evaluated parameters. Only the effect of the factor “nutrition” (Factor 1) was observed (Table 4), once the obese animals (subjected or not to stress) presented higher concentrations of total leukocytes (Cafe: 20550.00/mm3; Std: 6675.00/mm3), segmented neutrophils (Cafe: 6507.58/mm3; Std: 615.75/mm3), total neutrophils (Cafe: 6538.16/mm3; Std: 631.50/mm3) and lymphocytes (Cafe: 11363.50/mm3; Std: 5447.41/mm3) (Figure 5).
Our data suggest to neutrophilia and lymphocytosis in the obese animals evidenced changes in the immunological processes. The increased lymphocyte and neutrophil concentrations are evidences of changes in the immunological system of the obese animals, which can be related to the molecule secretion by adipocytes. According to Fain et al.,  and Wajchenberg , adipocytes secrete leptin in concentrations directly proportional to the adipose tissue mass and to nutritional condition of the organism. Considine et al.,  point to the fact that the adipose mass is one of the factors strongly associated with Lp concentrations in blood. Thus, the high Lp production by adipocytes drives a higher pro-inflammatory cytokines secretion by monocytes and, consequently, an increase of T lymphocytes. Evidences in vitro and in animals suggest that leptin plays an important role in the regulation of the humoral inflammatory response by means of the direct effects in T lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils and endothelial cells . Thus, the increase in body mass might leads an increase of the soluble leptin and, consequently, to the increase in the plasmatic levels of inflammatory markers associated with obesity , which would characterize a pro-inflammatory state capable to induce leukocytosis, as observed in the animals fed with cafeteria diet.
Another hypothesis that could explain leukocytosis is related to the epinephrine secreted by the adrenal medulla in chronic stress situations, as demonstrated by Mersmann . According to Thrall et al., , the effect of epinephrine on the leukogram can be expressed as the increase in the total leukocyte count, particularly in neutrophils and/or lymphocytes, as observed in our study.
The statistical analysis also revealed the absence of interactions between the factors “nutrition” and “condition” occurred with total proteins, albumin and globulin (Table 5). Only the effect of the factor “nutrition” was observed in glucose levels, whereas the obese animals (subjected or not to chronic stress) presented a glucose concentration of 146.91 g/dL in comparison to 119.83 g/dL from standard diet animals fed.
Rosmond  states that obesity is commonly associated with a range of metabolic diseases, which can influence the secretion of different substances by the adipocytes. These substances act in complex ways that are still being studied. According to Campos et al., , these substances can cause morpho-functional changes in the adipocytes, which secrete higher TNF-α and interleukin 6 concentrations in obese organisms, which are antagonist to insulin. In this case, this antagonist action could explain the hyperglycemia observed in the obese animals of our study, although we did not investigate the parameters linked to insulin.
We conclude that the cafeteria diet used in this study is effective in inducing obesity in female Wistar rats, but association with chronic stress did not alter hematological and biochemical parameters. The type of chronic stress protocol used, the age and sex of the animals used in our study constitute important factors that could have contributed to the absence of the joint effects caused by the two diseases (obesity and stress). On the other hand, it is important to have in mind the possibility of development of an adaptive process resultant from the repeated exposition to stress, which would lead to a metabolic tolerance that would prevent or minimize the damaging effects to the organism.
Figure 1: Schedule prepared for the experiment carried out with Wistar rats subjected to standard and cafeteria diets, and subjected or not to chronic stress by restriction.
Figure 2: Weekly body mass of Wistar rats subjected to standard and cafeteria diets, exposed or not to chronic stress by restriction.
Figure 3: A) Retroperitoneal fat mass.B) Visceral fat mass of Wistar rats subjected to standard and cafeteria diets, exposed or not to chronic stress by restriction.C) Representative images of the visual aspect of visceral fat of animals at the end of the experiment-standard diet (with or without stress) and cafeteria diet (with or without stress).
Bars indicate means + standard deviation of the data from two experiments (n=12), carried out independently. Comparison between Std and Cafe groups by two-way ANOVA of the factor 1, at 5% probability. Distinct lowercase letters indicate statistically significant differences between the experimental groups, according to the Tukey’s test. Std: standard diet group; Cafe: cafeteria diet group.
Figure 4: Relative adrenal gland mass (g) of female Wistar rats of the non-stressed and stressed groups (n=24 per group). Different letters indicate statistical differences (p<0.05) between different groups.
Figure 5: Serum concentrations of total leukocytes, segmented neutrophils, total neutrophils and lymphocytes, performed in Wistar rats subjected to standard and cafeteria diets, exposed or not to chronic stress by restriction.
Data expressed as mean ± standard deviation concerning the two experiments (n = 12), carried out independently. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (p<0.05) between the groups and the standard diet and cafeteria. Legend of the groups: standard diet (St) and cafeteria diet (Cafe).
|Ingredients of the standard feed(1) |
|Ground whole corn, Soybean bran, Wheat bran, Calcium carbonate, Dicalcium phosphate, Sodium chloride, Mixture of vitamins, Minerals and Amino acids. |
|Specifications(1) ||Warranty levels per kg of the product (g/kg)(1) |
|Moisture ||125 |
|Casein(2) ||220 |
|Ether extract ||40 |
|Mixture of salts ||90 |
|Fibrous matter ||70 |
|Calcium ||10 |
|Phosphorus ||8 |
|Kcal ||2930 |
|Enrichment per kg of the product(3) |
Vitamins: Vitamin A 13.000 UI; Vitamin D3 2.000 UI; Vitamin E 34 UI; Vitamin K3 3 mg; Vitamin B1 5 mg; Vitamin B2 6 mg; Vitamin B6 7 mg; Vitamin B12 22 µg; Niacin 60 mg; Calcium pantothenate 20 mg; Folic acid 1 mg; Biotin 0.05 mg; Choline 1900 mg.
Minerals: Zinc 60 mg; Copper 10 mg; Iodine 2 mg; Selenium 0.05 mg; Cobalt 1.5 mg; Fluorine 80 mg. Amino acids: Lysine 12 g; Methionine 4,000 mg.
Additives: BHT 100 mg.
Table 1: Nutritional information from the rodent standard feed (Nuvilab - CR1).
|Processed foods and portion (in grams) as regards their nutritional composition ||Kcal per portion ||Carbohydrates (g) ||Protein (g) ||Total lipids (g) |
|1. Bacon Krik (São João Sabor e Nutrição®) (30 g portion) ||120 ||19.8 ||1.8 ||3.6 |
|2. White chocolate bonbon (Nestle® Brazil) (20g portion) ||93 ||14 ||0.7 ||3.6 |
|3. Honey bread (Quero Quero) (30 g portion) ||123 ||28 ||1.6 ||0.4 |
|4. Salame (Friato®) (50 g portion) ||112 ||2.5 ||6 ||8 |
|5. Lemon wafer cookies (Parmalat®) (30 g portion) ||165 ||19 ||1.1 ||9.5 |
|6. Corn flakes (Skiny®) (25 g portion) ||127 ||20 ||1.8 ||4.2 |
|7. Coated peanuts (Dori®) (25 g portion) ||109 ||20.8 ||1.8 ||2.4 |
|8. Vanilla mini-cake (Bauducco®) (40 g portion) ||164 ||20 ||2.2 ||8.4 |
|9. Homemade dulce de leche (Parati®) (30 g portion) ||70 ||17 ||1 ||12 |
|10. Mini bread rolls (Pullman®) ( 50 g portion) ||154 ||28 ||3.9 ||2.8 |
|11. Sandwich biscuits of sweet brigadier (Mabel®) (30 g portion) ||147 ||21 ||1.7 ||6.9 |
|12. Toasted popcorn (São João®) (40 g portion) ||64.4 ||12.4 ||2.1 ||7.5 |
|13. Cookies (Bauducco®) (30 g portion) ||151 ||19 ||2.1 ||7.5 |
|14. Maisena biscuit (Parmalat®) (30 g portion) ||132 ||22 ||2.4 ||3.7 |
|15. Tapioca flour biscuit (Peta Caseira) (25 g portion) ||117 ||23.17 ||0.9 ||0.93 |
|16. Pizza flavored biscuit (Miliopã®) (30 g portion) ||128 ||22 ||2 ||3.5 |
|17. Caramel-filled bonbon (Nestlé®) (20 g portion) ||92 ||15 ||0.6 ||3.3 |
|18. Strawberry sandwich biscuit (Amanda®) (30 g portion) ||125 ||16 ||1 ||4 |
|19. Cheese flavored chips (Miliopã®) (30 g portion) ||130 ||22 ||2.2 ||3.8 |
|20. Provolone cheese (Vale Orizona®) (30 g portion) ||103 ||0 ||8.7 ||76 |
|21. Hot dog sausage (Sadia®) (50 g portion) ||121 ||33.7 ||6.8 ||9.5 |
|22. Paio sausage (Sadia®) (50 g portion) ||187 ||0 ||8.5 ||17 |
|23. Bacon flavored chip (Miliopã®) (25 g portion) ||105 ||18 ||1.8 ||2.5 |
|24. Mini chocolate cake (Bauducco®) (40 g portion) ||164 ||20 ||2.2 ||8.4 |
|25. Prestígio bonbon (Nestlé®) (18.4 g portion) ||85 ||11 ||0 ||3.8 |
|26. Mortadella (Friato®) (50 g portion) ||112 ||2.5 ||6 ||8 |
|27. Smoked Calabrian sausage (Sadia®) (50 g portion) ||182 ||0.8 ||8.7 ||16 |
|28. Lemon wafer cookies (Amanda®) (30 g portion) ||125 ||16 ||1 ||4 |
|29. Sugar peanut (Dori®) (15 g portion) ||73 ||8.9 ||1.8 ||3.4 |
|30. Cream biscuits (Maranata®) (30 g portion) ||190 ||20 ||2 ||5 |
|31. Chocolate donut (Mabel®) (30 g portion) ||125 ||22 ||1.8 ||3.5 |
|32. Carrot cake (Ana Maria®) (40 g portion) ||159 ||23 ||2 ||5.6 |
|33. Ready crackling (Sabor D’Abadia®) (10 g portion) ||68 ||0 ||2.6 ||6.2 |
|34. Sweet brigadier (Bauducco®) (30 g portion) ||133 ||18 ||1.7 ||6 |
|35. Baconzitos-bacon chips (Elma Chips®) (25 g portion) ||126 ||15 ||1.9 ||6.7 |
|36. Cashew (Dunorte®) (15 g portion) ||88 ||3.4 ||3 ||6.9 |
|37. Chicken sausage (Perdigão®) (50 g portion) ||106 ||2 ||6 ||8.2 |
|38. Mortadella (Sadilar®) (40 g portion) ||121 ||3.4 ||4 ||10 |
|39. Gomets (Dori®) (20 g portion) ||72 ||18 ||0 ||0 |
|40. Mini strawberry cake (Bauducco®) (40 g portion) ||146 ||20 ||2.2 ||6.4 |
|41. Baked cheese chips (Cheetos®) (20 g portion) ||100 ||11 ||0.9 ||4.4 |
|42. Wavy potato chip (Crony®) (25 g portion) ||153 ||1.4 ||1.7 ||10 |
|43. Ham (Sadia®) (30 g portion) ||36 ||0.8 ||3.9 ||1.9 |
|44. Sweet corn flakes (Ki gostoso®) (25 g portion) ||69 ||16 ||1.3 ||0 |
|45. Peanuts (Paulista®) (15 g portion) ||90 ||13.7 ||1.3 ||0 |
|46. Bis-chocolate wafer (Lacta®) (30 g portion) ||149 ||19 ||1.8 ||7.1 |
|47. Passatempo-strawberry filled sandwich biscuit (Nestlé®) (30 g portion) ||135 ||21 ||1.9 ||4.8 |
|48. Fandangos (Elma Chips®) (22 g portion) ||100 ||16 ||1.5 ||3.5 |
|49. Teens Bauny-rolls (Marilam®) (30 g portion) ||134 ||20 ||2.4 ||4.8 |
Table 2: Foods offered to the animals of the Cafe groups during the experimental period, with nutritional information.
| ||Factor 1 (“nutrition”) ||Factor 2 (“condition”) ||Interaction (F1 x F2) |
| Erythrogram |
|E (tera/L) ||F(1,44) = 4.176, p = 0.054 ||F(1,44) = 0.264, p = 0.612 ||F(1,44) = 0.773, p = 0.389 |
|Hem (%) ||F(1,44) = 2.951, p = 0.101 ||F(1,44) = 0.270, p = 0.608 ||F(1,44) = 0.258, p = 0.616 |
|Hb (g/dL) ||F(1,44) = 1.192, p = 0.287 ||F(1,44) = 0.838, p = 0.370 ||F(1,44) = 0.358, p = 0.555 |
|MCV (fL) ||F(1,44) = 0.721, p = 0.405 ||F(1,44) = 0.090, p = 0.767 ||F(1,44) = 1.701, p = 0.206 |
|MCHC (g/dL) ||F(1,44) = 1.975, p = 0.175 ||F(1,44) = 0.160, p = 0.693 ||F(1,44) = 0.005, p = 0.943 |
| Lipidogram |
|Cholesterol (mg/dL) ||F(1,44) = 1.546, p = 0.227 ||F(1,44) = 0.608, p = 0.444 ||F(1,44) = 0.999, p = 0.329 |
|Triglycerides (mg/dL) ||F(1,44) = 1.116, p = 0.303 ||F(1,44) = 0.701, p = 0.411 ||F(1,44) = 0.217, p = 0.645 |
|HDL (mg/dL) ||F(1,44) = 0.019, p = 0.890 ||F(1,44) = 0.008, p = 0.977 ||F(1,44) = 2.034, p = 0.169 |
|LDL (mg/dL) ||F(1,44) = 2.971, p = 0.100 ||F(1,44) = 1.516, p = 0.232 ||F(1,44) = 0.379, p = 0.544 |
|VLDL (mg/dL) ||F(1,44) = 1.116, p = 0.303 ||F(1,44) = 0.701, p = 0.411 ||F(1,44) = 0.217, p = 0.645 |
Table 3: Summary of the ANOVA F test for parameters of the erythrogram and lipidogram in Wistar rats subjected to standard and cafeteria diets, exposed or not to chronic stress by restriction.
E: erythrocyte; Hem: hematocrit; Hb: hemoglobin; MCH: mean corpuscular volume; MCHC: mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; VLDL: very low-density lipoprotein.
| ||Factor 1 (“nutrition”) ||Factor 2 (“condition”) ||Interaction (F1 x F2) |
|Total leukocytes (/mm3) ||F(1,44) = 5.554, p = 0.028* ||F(1,44) = 1.191, p = 0.666 ||F(1,44) = 0.539, p = 0.470 |
|Segmented neutrophils (/mm3) ||F(1,44) = 4.539, p = 0.045* ||F(1,44) = 0.181, p = 0.674 ||F(1,44) = 0.248, p = 0.623 |
|Total neutrophils (/mm3) ||F(1,44) = 4.579, p = 0.049* ||F(1,44) = 0.172, p = 0.682 ||F(1,44) = 0.249, p = 0.622 |
|Total lymphocytes (/mm3) ||F(1,44) = 6.652, p = 0.017* ||F(1,44) = 0.168, p = 0.685 ||F(1,44) = 1.052, p = 0.317 |
Table 4: Summary of the ANOVA F test for parameters of the leukogram in Wistar rats subjected to standard and cafeteria diets, exposed or not to chronic stress by restriction
Asterisk indicates the effect of the factor 1 on the parameters analyzed, at 5% probability by two-way ANOVA.
| || |
|Factor 2 (“condition”) ||Interaction F1 x F2 |
|Total proteins (g/dL) ||F(1,44) = 0.221, p = 0.642 ||F(1,44) = 0.252, p = 0,620 ||F(1,44) = 0.084, p = 0,740 |
|Albumin (g/dL) ||F(1,44) = 1.650, p = 0.213 ||F(1,44) = 0.015, p = 0,901 ||F(1,44) = 0.184, p = 0,671 |
|Globulin (g/dL) ||F(1,44) = 2.391, p = 0.137 ||F(1,44) = 0.248, p = 0,623 ||F(1,44) = 0.187, p = 0,669 |
|Glycemia (g/dL) ||F(1,44) = 7.265, p = 0.013* ||F(1,44) = 0.327, p = 0,573 ||F(1,44) = 0.019, p = 0,883 |
Table 5: Summary of the ANOVA F test for biochemical parameters of Wistar rats subjected to standard and cafeteria diets, exposed or not to chronic stress by restriction.
Asterisk indicates the effect of the factor 1 on the parameters analyzed, at 5% probability by two-way ANOVA.